娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???u&e6jL*Ur
金錢可以買到公義
q\S+L![8r2w 我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~
OnN5s ul;yZ)|6q.V 打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過
7}q'D K5ab 係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,
N|0lrc%PF 你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判
#p-mJ.r;[} that"s all.MxMJ:`

_G.I0J%|k7b [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~
@f'W F4wl![ @:q-Ef
KC Eu!m*zp [url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]{8bC F(p Y@&d | X
u:D;f3`+s.yMx,XJ#s2D
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:B{1F3}g L
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]
/OQ0f5bK/i~WJ| 尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,[&S q0Uk2\
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定&z%[p7h#o9j kEV
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁&wNSC/bk;{
)h*[+mtiA8JnH
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:
4h7u}lW J 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]
5HJ A;Q+q $jry vU.@q&xy|#HL6M
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.
h3w9p'pS,?? 用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
\ou6Uf+L2k
+A@W _yW(P 你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴Ko J-QP1@!rB
!} T8a;Xm }!R Q
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
uT s m3B)XX
Me(j:|*a 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]yI'Nq7~P*Hp
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。"}:G3UR$X,U:^
R:K9h+C5L3G`
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:/_/Jm\v-e8si

9\!t1J9_;C3I1U `~ UL7z:n+c
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
W`$U#@K9e7K
5L2P$o!q(UhRp-Lc This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.]#z#{*H*S c
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:1H2f!M\ \$@zG%mF,^Y

s ](u| Ah 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
-B M8U vKLP%\
4MJ.mEyy"xP 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)u+MiA W \~
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈a0eX:dB1?el$iF
6]c+Mmve.x&w
我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~ z"k&{x*[

uLA,Tv y3f|d9@my(t [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:
f2G:Y9af*G{ hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]D ~:G:SU-Wa5l:S
haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:$a8l O[0Z5XJ
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you);j/fB c ~

$|X-f8Y"a 民事訴訟:
X8g)B w}"\Y 告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM: Aw$t!o(`#t;]

a;H `){7GF8x Yu
Q(m:Ok[0a&W9Z 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
mX KK+PLHd 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote] h2\*}v;x0Az K
大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。
b.{{;v"Ren;|r R!z'ec7L9ew(` A
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:-AT!{8dc ]s7`_
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]D7iH ]bc
8@^.GX,K1Q
Not always... like this case..
\rFVT,Dh9cD:Du!w or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點 s7Y2r1]O$P
如果你喜歡T6D0NmzQ
您可以加入討論LS\H;wpJ
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
b;ip LV U!Cv d 已經代表自己的觀點
5c}ex2T]^$xi 您沒有需要繼續吠
rz*s r%]&m4?@ THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.