娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???
h5R8?+d:GZ aC%\ 金錢可以買到公義?(zp Tu"kY[
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~d5@%`w&A
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過
#D`2G1A%~ 係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,
]w8Gy T$H 你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判
ES] B"w*C.Y that"s allXbuM3or

$a JDK5p [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~
Hv M%[L_
D!d m9~m~ o [url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]6z8V5j/_Z$d,~,I NPM
bWXx$pB+o
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:
2?:@R8x/b q.p 有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]
:e c T ?Wz C ^(J 尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,%n Y+{t7Ab\n[
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定#_,w/MBI(o H
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁i.J k gV`.Lw%Wkp.^ ~
-GK$e~u#m8A!D
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:
z-`R5h&qX 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]
g.DT.}6vf]lH
${Hv| v8m3dDx#E 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.
!c+AM;u+mE \ 用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
F/IXA2Ni&ZDEc4K
hCD.x)| 你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
#vV0KC,R^lD+P1J
3C2h&WS,D H)Y [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
o*v#J,k.\|%cee
TOZq/\ ax 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
%[&D#["y9Cd$qG y 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。
&Q$_'a)z#X%kC ZP|L0Z Fij
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
&u g(B)c&l.R?u S
b7c$v b,a.M
:K+H5n_)KPZ 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
3W&RO"_m$X"l
#k8q$YNyA This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.J/{ CFIj
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:
U C'j|-VQ R 7O3s.I5V7lF&xo
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
(bkc%n%M&jt? .MNI.B&ib$zBr m
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)4k;A(f0n5k f
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈:Be)C-C`L

'?,Bc}A*ST*A 我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~
uHP3NbDBN Q#F3_
-Y"u0]%\!wT'G?_(D)L%{ [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:
O9HB A!i'e&`-R hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]
-g$Cervg5Y haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:
9S;V+{-E;M,@0sXP:P 告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
u w N XuD
;R~ _dS-f 民事訴訟:%d5[*_ UJ1j
告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM: Q i%f a.J7Xd
GhV7o3Vm(nm

T7@,cvEa5Q s 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
1j$t/Q!J+L7XV 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]
}*\q RE p] 大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。r&l2]q1P"Q1SrV
\+~#d CDzsb7e/uUC"H
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:qw6t;Hld(i4bJ
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]7z t ^/|N ^g9N:{X:?v
L`;{2jH;ly~H
Not always... like this case.. 2Na&D'p9~d#y
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點 wo;}8X1jjc@
如果你喜歡1HO"VU9s z kH e%M
您可以加入討論
7he&ck~ 但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
-Q!P'x-wBZ5PLH 已經代表自己的觀點(|uat(S? }c
您沒有需要繼續吠
3U8L u[A B THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.