娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???
!qW$B.p4p&i)H | 金錢可以買到公義c-X(rg"PeN
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~ EX:L1zg*J,a W,L
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過
ySKhR5E 係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,)[cq#E-k#x7v(g M2xn
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判
mwE9@ f$I{I$d that"s all
{X1~)N ~6L
8g rK*{ f[3Kx#k [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~
e3O2ZR H
bR^.e$]~ [url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]aM0B&rl(go_(f
'afA"_.n2uU
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:4]7uW B+M/H
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]'k"Th:BD8[q
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,(UW1?;X5o-s!G.E
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定g|)U3WY~)t Ti
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
-w|5~ORy b c +gb%BoD7|.uI3}5op
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:RXU#s^ S#c/S5Q
有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]
#N(K.M:za"GTo _5Z}oFcx;g]K3Z
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.
7z w6F0r:Xh/yi/K;^ 用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
B6s5Ml?v
9wAK#a@;G 你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
1~$itk$y] Oi-w)?
~\{L T1`6f [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
/s/q%sGSIq
"l(VgDN 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]|$vp]S cg@
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。Dg3q:SY

D2G&[V[Tl6N Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
:K%vS,j Ko2]Nv
@g go5R0It*i| NOd7u`n3@/g
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
"g2D"|/M9d;C]}Z4G *Jr4C'IG(yrc`c
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.T+rJs mS&J
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:g]__H R
,S4k5iLKa`6c
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]'LKJ#?XM\
jkQ7m pZ~L
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
&}(b5Y}/f 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈
d/V [pR G !v)_W$xP
我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~ R"Z"q [/T:Y
&V)c:B)Kb }SY*n F
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:
? dV(aP6o hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]XI-v#hU6?u%Q9R
haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:Tgt$y&{;@8vQ,Z
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you) [p i.vv1Y
O"r5||3\)HN
民事訴訟:
IG6[$`Fvy6j8? 告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:}z ]LYw2]3K pF

5U+\.~E/K~ u {? p"E5^%V6ueu
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;) O2eH td$M$Y+u
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]
$b| qR v%bP6d1xEm2b 大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。3K1aw\ t)U1E
$FR&OT&H!i
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
lIe6j+vH!i'x+C&a,S 仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
j SZq,F5@
Y0baN{0LulA K%aO-U Not always... like this case.. ,a-x5X pJU,nF#SY
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點G Y,\:jw'O
如果你喜歡
0IE2zk)|pn 您可以加入討論b8f)\ k-l%}d `
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
lHR"|2]$[ 已經代表自己的觀點L[ciU-WL
您沒有需要繼續吠A m8Y-}r\o
THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.