娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???7c3^u_@ vFX M
金錢可以買到公義3] |m]7R
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~
/Q*v+} ?"Lr KXU 打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過wGs*Xsp.P,Tr0SK
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,Sm~N7R1nm
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判Z MN!x"lEL#F u
that"s all9J%}T/q9\ }
Qz}9a/b9K
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~&pbu5Yw5gx"d

)x#n1tRo/H$M9s%l [url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]
5f'QzaTn1m`[
'B/Y&I&H[$n%M([ [[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:[clImuw Vea5Y
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]{W-Hx$C/K
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,E$D9P0^B6_ `gzU/{
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定JE9B f5J:E.p9O
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
'G5n F"jiFmD fPG\5M.HpJ
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:#g1XY{,N%jo9Gz
有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]8Zc/m YhIP4V
-|VsAg1B6{b
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.IT#l7o&i%|&r2R
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
o,b~Lw'[!vO C6} nE_]IZpP
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
pU~;g C#p
2i iw~3e[Y [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM: b Wku@0x1a

N7e7{!cYJcG4HDx8W 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
%l6e!_&f#l^#lM 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。){u!V-r,hk1G

} N _8\q;p Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:co c$o6t}.I
6Y|n1Qr
f _ |8~|
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
,W` r!f,w `6iN%? M*X~G2H
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
WXL5@d6k^$o|+P Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:"D6`(P"O{Q2X+C Hu c
k o+q3dHU+~}o
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]!p}4ZL xs(WiH$Ol
0D"Ci\8X%?
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)oZ p Xc@ZKY
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈4Qh Z1x6|!@
)q+{K&}I9HG3Y*X4O
我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~ b v0sJb

5A8N(K _j [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:
|-X;o1|.y hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]
M9`A8eY haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:
+m|fv"L3A{H4n,G+l*G 告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
jn$l oI&b;d$Y
s7R)j%aRpjJy5Y2L 民事訴訟:)xR*P^y2]Z.E0`c
告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:
,B,w,^t b8cq2s
t%?1}-p!k ,Hr HXeoN?3m{
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)D3ZA)ab.b6[#W^H
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]b4H rOdY
大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。
C1XZh4{~ ch,\` s#[
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:,s,[t"~-Qv4W
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]:J)t.S FvECo.~-hZ

pl$wCHxm|#n3} Not always... like this case.. B'ps Q9eoVO8d1Q1v
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點
)m)ss#^1rS,b+j 如果你喜歡i1i*N q#Ez-_T.X0Uk
您可以加入討論
:vr {"inzN0o@5Hbf 但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"]6DT:yO7~p
已經代表自己的觀點
j&iGJ2B*Yq1c7r1A]-s 您沒有需要繼續吠(WTS*J&K1bZf$G+M
THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.