娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???
7td9HN R/l!MG8N6j 金錢可以買到公義.xC vUj ^dC
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~
xf `,X!`Z6c8dV 打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過ki4V o0R}m,O
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,
'pC Dv I|g5z 你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判 E%qkZ'deT
that"s all {#C)ut ScX

Sdc@%p| Wc [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~V @*@A _ e

_-u[Dr0`!tl [url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]xbo&t tnc S

u+H R&Z.N.c}(L [[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:
m;MNV8Z 有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]
#M O@ Vcz 尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,!{1L"`7Ols
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定
F'eu'LBl9uI 仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
$S:?8f[RU0G&?
1T/yh0a(M KTe 事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:
,Qy_T R 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]
? Ei2j%G~
GNm_~P/h 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.hHB ]c.t-uu1b P
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
3g_~I6\W"]^ c0~"]
AOA@*U#r;t4^ _ 你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
2cb.XmE"g r8d C(s'Nq7ai-q
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
Uv-bE2Y#i&u"l
+P"j D`*PtI,jz1F 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
_ v$[ B] J(B5oA 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。
.}Q\5QV/}
"H`(Z.{ ~ Z4x:M Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:Kgyu La:WK*`

/z&d u$PV"A
+y?W3GXSL)?w)G 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
CR5a/i;m0t"hq \*Y-Qg"e3q
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
W5^ |t`b Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:
\9S Cm2^/nq a JBMl wK.R
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
fs.tH|Yrs X *S9eT w l#c
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)gcQ}J;O9L EG
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈wI ^p'J%};Vn4a

&s0KuM4w,s#Q 我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~Hi%P`}F
*O&w`8vULwy
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:
X'jN#sc(|/S hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]
9E4gquanB haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:9Rt*W3N"E'b
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)7} vp'h;`W6b3kn

^ R~p8RB5`)Q 民事訴訟:
nP;I,f{FN 告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:
C`{B-@w 'iv1dR6d4hf'`
$vIE D }&r\@
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
t0[F$ho6]_ 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]
9j5f:eE9L 大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。IK+z r|o Z
Fhi!k#Zy7w j
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:6Mtg@&w5?I7l
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]Sm/F"@2e8Fx6? N \

Ku cw^L Not always... like this case..
RBJa+u or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點 g\ j0E}e-PJa
如果你喜歡
"|/a${nJR+J)b CC j/v 您可以加入討論c"E1F[,Q)X5L,Z
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~" l&b,_~ N3z%c&rZ
已經代表自己的觀點[v#r3?`z
您沒有需要繼續吠 }C3R7bE)n7b$l"e
THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.