娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???
#]X8M.LOw6N5|"B 金錢可以買到公義
&d|#n![ig4Mb zt 我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~
8{)k ^[yCr%} 打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過Z:_#Fw| W e
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,LmPB%E]c Q
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判:w$S\$YU
that"s all%_rrk&`;UoG"G"o

SiSm!w [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~7[.@s7u.t C
wp0O-LA~V8HI
[url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]b B!J`S
/BL w^P6gg
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:6^R ~/}"Z_d3ae,X
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]1Kvi1nY/[\;x-Ou{4z
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,
+i[RV(BU1d 但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定~1\S,sjuD:IN
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁!i&GL;dm]+?@

,a|}~ O5a @2qz 事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:
&t;|$Se!s/x 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote] ^7v#T)bg"x f[
a V#?cI
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.m*ET~7CxU3Z$B
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?V;l Sm~/hM:C
Z#X _)m8cx1s#@
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
q{t(Ja3K6_ G Hq%j
._}!p.N$@U?x [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM: {,WiP1\@ER
!F5m j |r
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]R/Wa |8Z x k,S
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。[Vu8tW*I Ke
9?Q"PRsY,b5{F
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
Z0g\J0` N9[z]p ^*j

GMO.y[ 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
)v7s6]%~2|h
0u neU(^z!v9| This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.K~Q-mV2MOL,y
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:6eq9C Zc#e^n:o$b

Tp(AAw*RW ND 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
-REPE/m$P.v%YS
a2jr-uE,Z:X$S 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)2K+q$LHExah G
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈H3U \"q/{W7L/\`S
Y@.i(_5| g2y q
我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~q0BoI2d~4k
,E{O0Q ~ {
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:$l6WJ4Z{3z\
hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]
3E6a"w+L5H1o haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:
-m{wT;b"u 告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
0}g k Ktg z:U(p!V;t '?Rh`%kt
民事訴訟:
q'x Te3l;w 告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:2Tk*@#N6u v-k
R&e,d,M-[)w%^x

u;OfF@ u c 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
1nE x#w"QAqGe 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]!tpRh V }qOTSM
大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。(K"Um%{rl.X;M

8QYtXvJD 答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
E7U`{0X 仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
~kD?e2oO?y
l0q5c:C2g1f Not always... like this case.. `/`r2He
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點g Z-V gq1o5S
如果你喜歡*B*}s w/_
您可以加入討論
a/R|)V }+_$URd_ 但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
h~x$lt'K0Z6m l1M@ 已經代表自己的觀點
HyO*c OC 您沒有需要繼續吠dc L^"J;W X wh
THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.