Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~
Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???7c3^u_@ vFX M金錢可以買到公義3]|m]7R
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad: 疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。 人地講左啦~
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過wGs*Xsp.P,Tr0SK
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,Sm~N7R1nm
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判ZMN!x"lEL#F u
that"s all9J%}T/q9\}
Qz}9a/b9K
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]] 寧縱勿枉 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~&pbu5Yw5gx"d
[url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:[clImuw Vea5Y
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]{ W-Hx$C/K
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。 我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,E$D9P0^B6_ `gzU/{
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定JE9B f5J:E.p9O
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
fPG\5M.HpJ
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。” [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:#g1XY{,N%jo9Gz
有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]8Zc/mYhIP4V
-|VsAg1B6{b
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.IT#l7o&i%|&r2R
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
n E_] IZp P
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM: b Wku@0x1a
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。){u!V-r,hk1G
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:co c$o6t}.I
6Y|n1Qr