娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???9{3j s(M6\3g$m j
金錢可以買到公義
xNf#||| f 我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~R4r)w j.gvSe
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過
ai9p*OOh~o 係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童, qeJW-o5@v$i$y7z
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判)uc$[y}*v
that"s all
?&zRQx3W`#d
H c` t,W h/U [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~
:z8N1s1a;P.dmN /rI9P m&E%a
[url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]
:ksL6f+v B
0\)msNA%{$P [[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:#B:xXWh.f
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]
K&o9p.|6k 尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,
C9??9KJ`H f:iF$~)RT 但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定
`U x!` a$@ 仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
.UL,D:I]]{BO L9Y4G u9L,s
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:
rT?+}]f 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]Kwb!wz1YO\

x&|+z|/W2f T3JS 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.I!I&in1t`P
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?v Pn'H,_'[My:Ah

Nb5Y+?n8x H2G/t 你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴6C9v$p)D`4DLG(HV

yUm rv3wHC'a W [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
$O CFG N
O2N$r-N p_5{:n8H 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
ib E#|K5If [ 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。.]"U6vgb{[\ Py E
b}e K$a(qm js(c
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
Y'O\/i5Vq:l3C/r'~
`2Lq/nJ@
a7k5xqn 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
3u(lAMD e\
A.Z|7F:p6f This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.-W4[`-dY5G h
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:+I*xu#SlK$K4^

%K}'@`?!U} 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]Zg!l0Q"I8i:H:t

8PojLZ 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
6r;j~0_5^3G&y:P+e 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈
`8Ce q t$r
0r4W3b(|;N%z%za 我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~
0wa;`{o y
"mp Qu v si9o:G)]"e [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:
5F"\ j0t,qX#S+s h&I hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]5M8^ a9O"{,RNW,\
haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:
K|r\RY 告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)tKb A7H

dj3XY1\+e;\ 民事訴訟:
}oCB mC S z 告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:3}9L0|3Pf;F;~MP

(v\8pR!Z^+i
1lY Ua*Bv 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
u NJ#N7RM 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]T? ?7z$\ f+Ig
大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。7@+rXo3t

:v6X6~8M DR@:D#l 答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:kd hpiO G
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
db^R5it%j%~
FO CIG Not always... like this case.. X:ID y2r(Q
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點aa8eR@7gHe
如果你喜歡)G#`HXoL.|p
您可以加入討論 U]@#?6j
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
+Q"}| W0b:r 已經代表自己的觀點
4VA{@%`ap@M#Y 您沒有需要繼續吠p^5k%O,V:j2T!c1r
THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.