清揚 發表於 2005-6-21 09:29 AM
我系識睇波、識踼波既人,識睇波既人從不會覺碧咸好波,識踼波既人更不會以碧咸為模仿對像
abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-21 09:29 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]279x[/i] at 2005-6-21 05:58 AM:
絕對同意。
清揚兄︰你成日話... [/quote]
這就是問題所在,清揚兄家下就係話佢冇技術冇呢樣冇果樣,但係碧咸唔係呢類球員嘛,如果佢真係非常唔掂既就唔會有人要佢同鍾意佢啦,就算佢幾咁出名都冇用,一樣冇人鍾意
清揚 發表於 2005-6-21 09:32 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]279x[/i] at 2005-6-21 06:22:
咁點解你又唔諗吓你咁唔鍾意佢,... [/quote]
不如我比埋$$$你去睇心理醫生丫,唔like碧咸就要睇心理醫生,[size=6]你冇野ar[/size]???
abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-21 09:33 AM
[quote]咁點解你又唔諗吓你咁唔鍾意佢,但係就有好多人鍾意佢,若然佢真係咁唔掂,點會仲有咁多人睇佢。其實球星咪好似影星一樣,鍾唔鍾意佢地係好主觀,[color=Red][size=6]有的人like有的人憎係好正常,如果人地一鍾意你唔like嗰個你就嬲,咁就真係要睇吓心理醫生[/size][/color](我唔係講笑),大家網友,我都唔想你有事。[/quote]
清揚 發表於 2005-6-21 09:35 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-6-21 09:29:
這就是問題所在,清揚兄家下就係話佢... [/quote]
我話比你知,碧咸有的只是斬波比人的技術,其如系冇既
清揚 發表於 2005-6-21 09:37 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-6-21 09:33:
[/quote]
我冇嬲過你地like碧咸,[color=Red][size=6]我嬲既系碧咸[/size][/color]
abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-21 09:41 AM
不知你技術的定義在那裡......[color=Red][size=5]係咁多,唔講喇,留返夜d比人講[/size][/color]
abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-21 09:41 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-21 09:37 AM:
我冇嬲過你地like碧咸,[color=Red][size=6]我嬲既系碧咸[/size][/color] [/quote]
好奇一問,佢得罪過你咩.......
清揚 發表於 2005-6-21 09:58 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-6-21 09:41:
好奇一問,佢得罪過你咩....... [/quote]
佢打得咁差都可以飛黃騰達就是錯.
abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-21 10:44 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-21 09:58 AM:
佢打得咁差都可以飛黃騰達就是錯. [/quote]
哦~原來係咁,真係打得差呀~~~
清揚 發表於 2005-6-21 10:55 AM
我其在睇唔過眼佢同迪比亞路一樣欺騙世人,呃球會人工,就因為呢D人令一D有真本事既人被遺忘,從而失望的結束球員生涯!!!!!當尼、米高利就正是被迪比亞路害的人板
abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-21 10:57 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-21 10:55 AM:
我其在睇唔過眼佢同迪比亞路一樣欺騙... [/quote]
做得球員就預左嫁啦,只怪自己比唔到表現人睇兼教練唔用你,
就算借出去有幾勁都係假,你係自己本身果隊球隊做唔到野人地唔會用你,就算你幾有商業價值同幾有天份都係假~~~仲有,迪比亞路同碧咸叫呃人工咩,唔覺喎,咁大把球員都係啦,
有正選,有練習,總之有為球隊付出就有資格攞份人工,人工高唔高係老細話事~加上呢個球壇唔係好似你諗到咁樣,好波就一定有正選打有得上位既,基本上入得球隊踢職業就一定有返咁上下,人地鍾唔鍾意某個球員係人地既事,你唔鍾意係你既事,再加上呢個球壇好似野唔係我地可以話事~~~
[[i] Last edited by abc123aa on 2005-6-21 at 11:01 AM [/i]]
清揚 發表於 2005-6-21 11:01 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-6-21 10:57:
做得球員就預左嫁啦,只怪自己比唔到... [/quote]
你有冇睇過當尼、米高利踼波架,佢地做唔到野,你傻架!!!!!
abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-21 11:04 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-21 11:01 AM:
你有冇睇過當尼、米高利踼波架,佢地做唔到野,你傻架!!!!! [/quote]
阿生,係教練眼中出一兩場做到野係應該嫁,教練唔會因為呢幾場賽事而對某個球員改觀,除非有極好既表現,正如你話迪比亞路同碧咸一樣,佢地做唔到野咩,祖記對a米果場意甲生死戰都係迪比亞路傳波比查斯古特先有波入嫁咋~
仲有呀,我睇過米高利踢波,的確係有料之人,但點解教練唔用佢呢,只有教練自己知,唔係你話佢好波就好波,屎波就屎波,應該用就應該用,你估打we咩,再加上係祖記咁多人選擇既情況下根本唔輪到米高利,有得比佢係費倫打仲想點呀,有d想做職業足球員都冇機會呀~~~
[[i] Last edited by abc123aa on 2005-6-21 at 11:07 AM [/i]]
清揚 發表於 2005-6-21 11:18 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-6-21 11:04:
阿生,係教練眼中出一兩場做到野係應... [/quote]
迪路同碧咸就一兩場做到野,米高利、兩年前既當尼就一兩場失靈,呢D系好多球迷、教練既感覺,米高利有技術有速度傳送更與迪路不相佰仲射門亦不比迪路差,曾多次後備入替迪路更入波,佢入左場成隊祖記生晒,當尼以長傳聞名,比碧咸更擅控制節奏,效率超高,助攻又助守,簡直系意大利既尼維特,迪路憑甚麼阻人發圍ar,全因為佢生得比較俊俏.
abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-21 11:20 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-21 11:18 AM:
迪路同碧咸就一兩場做到野,米高利、... [/quote]
算啦,都係果句啦,靚仔呀嘛~~~
清揚 發表於 2005-6-21 11:37 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-6-21 11:20:
算啦,都係果句啦,靚仔呀嘛~~~ [/quote]
你知就好la,雖則托迪都靚仔,托迪只系紀律差堵,但人地真系有料ㄚ麻,所以我冇話可說
[[i] Last edited by 清揚 on 2005-6-21 at 11:41 AM [/i]]
abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-21 11:38 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-21 11:37 AM:
你之就好la [/quote]
係囉~~~呵呵~:P
wer 發表於 2005-6-21 11:52 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-21 09:58:
佢打得咁差都可以飛黃騰達就是錯. [/quote]
我也知道碧咸多靠外貌,只有七旋斬值得學習
就算如此又如何,世上就有很多不公平的事
難道你每一件都搬出來說嗎
說多只有憤怒
abcde1918 發表於 2005-6-21 11:57 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-6-21 11:52 AM:
我也知道碧咸多靠外貌,只有七旋斬值得學習
就算如此又如何,世上就有很多不公平的事
難道你每一件都搬出來說嗎
說多只有憤怒 [/quote]
兄弟唔冇咁勞氣呀!!!
頁:
1
2
3
4
5
6
[7]
8
9
10