娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

goodgirl1 發表於 2005-6-16 07:36 AM

Mcdyess對活記重要or Horry對馬記重要?

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Gretzky 發表於 2005-6-16 07:42 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

F.king 發表於 2005-6-16 09:08 AM

Horry
Even though I am not spurs fans, I still think that Horry is one of the best players in NBA

if you see the statistics, he is not the toppest players.
However, if you watch his games, his importance is as same as the best players in every team.

he can do everything in defense and he is also a very good offensive player
In addition, he is not a self-fish player and he could choose the best decision in the important memont
therefore, when he is in the game, his teammates can be much easier to score because Horry knows how to run to a place to break the zone (run out to three points line, screen, run inside for waiting offensive rebound or score...)
because his FG% is really good, he can always break the zone for his teammates without his directly assist and his teammates can score much easier that not have to pass to him; therefore, his statistic is not as good as "superstar" (Of course, his pass assist is very good too; but usually he is not the one assist directly to the player who score)

he defense is really good and I don't know how to explain( I am not good in basketball)
but you can see he can assist teammates to double team in the right time but not miss the player who he has to follow (and his defense is not too violence)

therefore, I think Horry is more important
because I think even though Mcdyess is very good, but he is not as good as Horry in some jobs which is not in statistics

p.s. maybe I don't really understand Mcdyess, because I didn't watch his games a lot
I feel sorry if my points are not correct

goodgirl1 發表於 2005-6-16 09:16 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

秋葉林 發表於 2005-6-16 09:42 AM

雖然我個人鍾意 Horry 多啲,但係如果係問 Mcdyess 對活塞重要啲定係 Horry 對馬刺重要啲,咁就當然係 Mcdyess 對活塞重要啲啦。

主要係因為活塞隊除咗 Mcdyess 之外,根本無乜內線嘅替補球員,相反馬刺果邊 Horry 嘅角色有其他人可以替代﹙當然係除咗佢嘅經驗同救命三分波之外啦﹚,所以馬刺無咗 Horry 未必贏唔到總冠軍,但係活塞無咗 Mcdyess,兩個 Wallace 會辛苦好多,一個唔生性有犯規纏身,內線就會出現崩潰。

cho1989 發表於 2005-6-16 10:02 AM

兩個啲經驗都對球隊好重要

benben 發表於 2005-6-16 10:35 PM

我好同意 "秋葉林" ga 話法, Mcdyess比較重要d.

清揚 發表於 2005-6-16 10:43 PM

麥帶斯更堅,比佢打正選代拉舒特.華來士仲好la,大家點睇???

brightlee 發表於 2005-6-16 10:47 PM

no...... I am opposite than you....
R. Wallace needs to be in starting lineup..
cos he can play low posts, he can shoot in mid-range, he can block
but for McDyess, he's an interior scorer
that's why R. Wallace should be in the starting lineup,

清揚 發表於 2005-6-16 10:51 PM

拉舒特.華來士識守唔多識攻,射波又下下炒,點搞ar

brightlee 發表於 2005-6-16 10:59 PM

I got what you mean, I watched game 2 too...
but remember one thing, he could shift to play Center/SF.. that's why he could be starting no matter what's happened
I am not saying McDyess is bad..
but in this Pistons, they need R. Wallace to be starting.. cos Spurs needs to guy him tightly....
when he's on fire, then no one can stop him.. like Parker/Hamilton

benben 發表於 2005-6-16 11:20 PM

R.Wallace 唔係唔識攻, 只係 Detroit 有幾個進攻點, 好平均,
同MY, Final 對 San Antonio ga 內線唔係甘簡單 T. Duncan , Robert Horry ,
Nazr Mohammad , Radoslav Nesterovic 個個都好兇很:mad::mad::mad:

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-6-17 12:16 PM

好難作出比較喎

abcde1918 發表於 2005-6-17 02:38 PM

好難講呀

wer 發表於 2005-6-17 03:13 PM

差不多

頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.