娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-28 08:24 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bettman[/i] at 2005-6-28 03:40 PM:
lock topic啦
一日到黑講碧咸....睇嚟睇去都係嗰D論點....悶
雖然我唔多like沙基但係佢都係一個成功既教練...講嘢點都有說服力 [/quote]
我都好悶~

pkdonald 發表於 2005-6-28 09:06 PM

RE

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-6-27 10:31 PM:

對~如果用埋右邊一定重奪冠軍 [/quote]


[IMG]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b400/donaldpo23a/3357791-2035.jpg[/IMG]

abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-28 09:11 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]pkdonald[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:06 PM:



[IMG]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b400/donaldpo23a/3357791-2035.jpg[/IMG] [/quote]
依家好明顯睇皇馬只係用左邊攻擊力太細啦~巴塞點解可以咁勁就係因為兩邊都用晒,左邊有細哨,右邊有古利~~~

michael86 發表於 2005-6-28 09:18 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-6-28 08:20 PM:
I don't know why so many people dislike Backham..... [/quote]

關公都有對頭人!:P

最明顯既原因咪D人覺得佢似明星多過球員LAW:D

清揚 發表於 2005-6-28 09:25 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-6-28 21:18:


關公都有對頭人!:P

最明顯既原因咪D人覺得佢似明星多過球員LAW:D [/quote]
有球技又點會比人當明星ar,碧咸同托迪都有樣有名,又唔見托迪比人話系明星???因為托迪在場上充份表現了自己的球技(紀律另計)

abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-28 09:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:18 PM:


關公都有對頭人!:P

最明顯既原因咪D人覺得佢似明星多過球員LAW:D [/quote]
呵呵,係呀~:D,d人都唔知係唔係睇波既,係球場上踢緊波既明顯係球員啦,又會係明星既

abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-28 09:30 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:25 PM:

有球技又點會比人當明星ar,碧咸同托迪都有樣有名,又唔見托迪比人話系明星???因為托迪在場上充份表現了自己的球技(紀律另計) [/quote]
有冇球技見仁見智

清揚 發表於 2005-6-28 09:31 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-6-28 21:30:

有冇球技見仁見智 [/quote]
我的見解是碧咸冇球技.

michael86 發表於 2005-6-28 09:34 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:25 PM:

有球技又點會比人當明星ar,碧咸同托迪都有樣有名,又唔見托迪比人話系明星???因為托迪在場上充份表現了自己的球技(紀律另計) [/quote]

[size=6][color=Red]絕對[color=White]不[/color]認同清揚兄![/color][/size]:)

又我上了寶貴一課

[[i] Last edited by michael86 on 2005-6-28 at 09:38 PM [/i]]

abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-28 09:37 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:34 PM:

[size=6][color=Red]絕對[color=White]不[/color]認同清揚兄![/color][/size]:)

又我上了寶貴一課 [/quote]
我都係上左寶貴一課^^"

[[i] Last edited by abc123aa on 2005-6-28 at 09:43 PM [/i]]

michael86 發表於 2005-6-28 09:39 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:25 PM:

有球技又點會比人當明星ar,碧咸同托迪都有樣有名,又唔見托迪比人話系明星???因為托迪在場上[color=Red]充份表現了自己的球技[/color](紀律另計) [/quote]

碧咸世界足球先生拎亞軍真係屎!肯定係因為唔夠靚仔
湯告魯斯去踢波肯定拎冠軍!:)

michael86 發表於 2005-6-28 09:42 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:31 PM:

我的見解是碧咸冇球技. [/quote]

咁只要靚仔既話就算[size=6][color=Red]冇[/color][/size]球技也可踢波,也可當選世界足球先生亞軍吧!

abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-28 09:43 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:42 PM:


咁只要靚仔既話就算[size=6][color=Red]冇[/color][/size]球技也可踢波,也可當選世界足球先生亞軍吧! [/quote]
點解湯告魯斯唔去踢波呀,否則一定做球王

清揚 發表於 2005-6-28 09:43 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-6-28 21:39:


碧咸世界足球先生拎亞軍真係屎!肯定係因為唔夠靚仔
湯告魯斯去踢波肯定拎冠軍!:) [/quote]
做二奶都可以炫耀的話,冠軍果個咪系神???
(系咁勁就唔會做二奶)

abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-28 09:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:43 PM:

做二奶都可以炫耀的話,冠軍果個咪系神???
(系咁勁就唔會做二奶) [/quote]
大把人做二奶啦,巴迪高咪又係第三......咁又係廢人咯???

michael86 發表於 2005-6-28 09:50 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:43 PM:

做二奶都可以炫耀的話,冠軍果個咪系神???
(系咁勁就唔會做二奶) [/quote]

能夠係全世界咁多個球員拎到亞軍,唔通唔開心?:D
即是說如果會考我拎9A1B輸左俾個10A我都要自卑

haha!!你呢個言論又幾搞鬼架WOR!:lol::D:lol::D

清揚 發表於 2005-6-28 09:50 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-6-28 21:44:

大把人做二奶啦,巴迪高咪又係第三......咁又係廢人咯??? [/quote]
系技不如人

abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-28 09:52 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:50 PM:


能夠係全世界咁多個球員拎到亞軍,唔通唔開心?:D
即是說如果會考我拎9A1B輸左俾個10A我都要自卑

haha!!你呢個言論又幾搞鬼架WOR!:lol::D:lol::D [/quote]
係囉,如果我考第二,我都係一人之下萬人之上既皇者,咁都唔開心的話真係要求太大~:lol:

abc123aa 發表於 2005-6-28 09:53 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:50 PM:

系技不如人 [/quote]
原來巴迪高技不如人,唔怪得留係費倫咁多年:o

michael86 發表於 2005-6-28 09:53 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-6-28 09:50 PM:

系技不如人 [/quote]

都唔夠你呢句說話"(系咁勁就唔會做二奶)"咁技不如人!!!HAHAHAHAAHA!!:lol::D:lol::D
無得駁開始亂咁UP!!!!:D

頁: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.