[quote]Originally posted by [i]singdotcom[/i] at 2005-6-28 04:42 PM:
死啦死啦, 教宗篇野又出現啦
[url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=59463&fpage=1[/url] #44 [/quote]
m Iu av&\d(e1qq
哦.... 有人扮原創
俾一日時間你解釋;)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]crap[/i] at 2005-6-28 06:56 PM:"k4mK,Cq"MN!\
"m(W,DQ+`Fn!c;V~
哦.... 有人扮原創
俾一日時間你解釋;) [/quote]
唉.....*]1gV2z"Fd"e
咁又何苦呢:(
今日睇完~
對於一個頭d迷黎講~
呢出電影可以講係影衰晒~!
睇到我火都黎埋~
講到文太成個醉酒佬同淫虫咁~-M(A)o6z ij0dC"s
而阿樹部85又變左86個樣~/T/QZBG%Md
京一ge無燃點火不在講~ S:i!NM-kR]F-Y
漫畫中里渣bnr32明明唔會飄移~(以前渣s13會)
好灰~
我就唔講太多喇!,?mc3`4z.h7@8y@;Q}
兩個字...."失望"
劉偉強啲戲一樓作風"散修修"唔多講喇....
飄移黎黎去去都係得三個彎左右...(我估仲係影一至兩次repeat嗰隻....其餘啲彎好似失晒踪甘)....連秋名最經典既五連彎居然冇詳細影出黎(最後一場算影得最多)......
根本就只係想睇飛車同飄移......佢就用剪接將啲過彎搞到一節節......睇到發火!! 根本都唔覺係砌緊車...(心目中係想佢由頭到尾影成條秋名山飛車過程.....佢就一味剪接草草了事!!)
成套戲冇砌直路甘...... 過彎就影部車啦....影影下剪接個人頭落去.....破壞晒場車....an1WX.pfN,]$d
結論係: 唔到喉更唔到肺.....想睇既嘢睇唔到! 仲有我死唔信佢冇用特技....根本好多鏡頭都好假! 生果日報居然俾四粒提子......以後都唔會信哩啲影批!!
你懂做motion graphic,animation的难处吗??
香港电影的buddget比荷里活来的少,但能做出如头文字d的电影已好无错啦
[color=Purple][b]有認真回答者+[/b][/color]
或許真係祈望過高......
但我相信入場既人都係大多想睇我講啲嘢........但睇唔睇到呢??
砌車唔係影砌車甘....大佬! 唔好剪到甘吖!
有一度仲谷鬼氣!黃秋生教佢個仔楂車嗰度, 佢老闆係甘影住啲樹...一味只係有聲......唔通要人入場想像一番?lvb0D#^9W|
我想講既係......浪費咗秋名山條路....哩套始終係戲...唔係漫畫.....睇戲係真係想睇到砌車,甩尾成個過程........剪到甘....睇返漫畫啦不如!
故事己經係薄....仲好多劉生既作風----->交代得草草了事!(如86套'計'燒咗嗰幕!).......一味淨係靠黃秋生啲戲答救, 同傻強啲冇里頭......如果甘就叫好睇既話....就唔係睇緊砌車囉!
我覺得套戲ok law,最衰系條感情線law
[quote]Originally posted by [i]crap[/i] at 2005-6-28 08:56 PM: