其實一個前鋒企係前線
對方門將可能都會覺得有威脅
將注意力分左d過去
所以其實都好難話企越位位冇掂波就叫冇參與進攻
不過如果2個球員相差好遠咁又另計既
我覺得除非offside球員唔在禁區內,否則一定要吹.如果尹佬射波直接射入,朗尼offside但阻擋keeper視線,咁又點計,另外如果offside球員唔掂波,但佢走返出來時擋一擋防守球員回防,令冇offside隊友早一步攞波,又吹唔吹呢?我就覺得要吹
[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:29 AM:
如果射入就唔計...射唔入就計 [/quote]
咁當然啦
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:30 AM:
我覺得除非offside球員唔在禁區內,否... [/quote]
第一個情況應該唔會吹,第二個就要吹,因為阻住對方球員等於犯規.......唔吹唔得~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-6-30 11:59 PM:
其實吹又對攻方唔公平，唔吹又對守方唔公平
你知la,有d防守球員一見到有人越位就唔追剩係顧住舉手...:D [/quote]
侯夫.....^^"
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:38 AM:
侯夫.....^^" [/quote]
好多後防都會犯呢個錯
基本上我覺得一個一級後防係需要不顧一切咁追波:cool:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:27 AM:
要計越位呀應該,琴日羅賓奴射中眉,細哨想補射,但一攞波就吹左越位 [/quote]
咁係因為個波中途無掂到任何對方球員...
羅賓奴ge射門會當傳波咁睇
所以細哨咪offside lo @@
其實offside新例同得益規條好似
真係好睇球證點諗
有冇參與進攻好難定義
有d球員可以係未掂波ge情況下騷擾對方
好似遮下keeper視線...阻下後衛追波咁
e d旁證果個角度未必睇到 @@
[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:40 AM:
好多後防都會犯呢個錯
基本上我覺得一個一級後防係需要不顧一切咁追波:cool: [/quote]
有時係唔係都追好辛苦ge...
最緊要都係觀察...同埋熟d球例lo ^^
[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:42 AM:
咁係因為個波中途無掂到任何對... [/quote]
吓,掂到球員就唔越位啦,因為個波都未去到果度.......= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:40 AM:
好多後防都會犯呢個錯
基本上我覺得一個一級後防係需要不顧一切咁追波:cool: [/quote]
冇錯,如果侯夫果日唔係掛住舉手而遲左攔阿祖就唔洗輸啦德國~~"
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:44 AM:
吓,掂到球員就唔越位啦,因為個波都未去到果度.......= =" [/quote]
好似中完眉之後....keeper拍返個波出黎
去左細哨度...咁就無offside
因為等同係對方交波比自己....根本唔存在有冇offside ge問題 @@
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:45 AM:
冇錯,如果侯夫果日唔係掛住舉手而遲左攔阿祖就唔洗輸啦德國~~" [/quote]
e d咪叫無經驗lo = =""
[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:46 AM:
好似中完眉之後....keeper拍返個波出黎
去左細哨度...咁就無offside
因為等同係對方交波比自己....根本唔存在有冇offside ge問題 @@ [/quote]
龍門拍返出黎係照計越位的~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:47 AM:
e d咪叫無經驗lo = ="" [/quote]
haha~唔知摩佬會唔會用佢呢~
我就覺得兩者都要吹,如果斬個罰球入來你offside,你衝頂但漏入,keeper實比你影響到,而且防守球員冇責任判決攻擊球員有冇offside而做唔做防守動作,因為應該由球證負責,另外第二個例子佢走出來在你面前行過,冇任何動作,等於單擋一樣,只係令你窒一窒唔算犯規,但1秒已經夠隊友搶先一步,所以我覺得兩者都吹offside
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:47 AM:
龍門拍返出黎係照計越位的~ [/quote]
e個唔記得lu ^^"
不過對方球員就應該唔計
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:48 AM:
haha~唔知摩佬會唔會用佢呢~ [/quote]
應該會用ge ^^
如果你因為佢無經驗而唔用佢咁佢就永遠都唔會有經驗 @@
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:51 AM:
我就覺得兩者都要吹,如果斬個罰球入來... [/quote]
但係有時....d球員踎埋一邊綁鞋帶咁真係無符ga wo @@
或者傷左坐係度....咁都有可能會阻到對方球員回防....
所以最後都係要睇球證 = =
射波時你offside,射中後衛你執鷄都會吹
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:57 AM:
射波時你offside,射中後衛你執鷄都會吹 [/quote]
我意思係射完之後
你e個case...就肯定越la ^^