[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:52 AM:
e個唔記得lu ^^"
不過對方球員就應該唔計 [/quote]
龍門拍出就一定計,射中對方球員就應該唔會當越位,但係依家如果a球員斬波斬比b球員,但係經過對方既c球員頂到個波先比到b球員射入左,其實咁樣應該唔越位,但係d球証照吹><"
射波時冇offside,到對方掂波時先offside就梗係冇啦,但射波時冇,離腳後先offside就唔理對方掂唔掂到都冇offside
因為球證係吹翻第一腳,即係a斬那一腳,國際足協新例正是針對e樣,舊例a比c,一offside就吹,新例就掂波先吹,但後衛唔知球證吹唔吹,實盡量攔截,一掂波就變冇offside,實在唔公平,舉例朗尼比尹佬,尹佬offside2個身位,未掂波球證唔吹,A高爾聽唔到鷄聲出腳攔截,但掂到波皮漏比尹佬,就變冇offside,咁以後d防守球員到唔到之間對方又好似offside出唔出腳好??
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-1 01:27 AM:
因為球證係吹翻第一腳,即係a斬那一腳,... [/quote]
對,咁樣好似有d唔公平,不過奇就奇在有d球証吹....有d唔吹= ="
我覺得新例係好o既 但如果要配合 就要旁証睇準d同留意多左
以前一見到有人越位 舉棋就得
依家就要留意埋越位果個有冇參與攻勢
好似以上個例子咁 如果史高斯長傳果陣 朗尼有跑到但冇參與進攻而雲佬入左 就應該越位
雖然佢冇份進攻 但係佢一跑就會令防守球員分心 旁證又冇吹 唔知睇實雲佬定朗尼
咁樣防守球員在不知所措下 對方好易造成入球 應該吹越位
相反當史高斯長傳果陣 朗尼明知自己越位 唔追波向後走 咁就唔應該吹越位
佢冇心追波 旁證又冇吹 d防守球員就可以專心睇實雲佬 賽事都可以流暢d
投訴都投訴唔到啦 朗尼連追波都冇 何來參與進攻何來越位?
所以依種情況下o既越位 就要睇身處越位果位球員有冇追個波
旁証o係依種情況下 見到4-5個球員一出一入 一定覺得好混亂
依家o既旁証真係需要打醒十二分精神先得
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-1 01:27 AM:
因為球證係吹翻第一腳,即係a斬那一腳,... [/quote]
但係依家既球證,有d 就係個球員跑緊就舉旗,一d 就等佢掂左波先舉,造成若果後衛快一步攔截,去番進攻球員腳下,就變冇offside....咁樣is not fair
good topic!!!
I am the referee/linesman in church competition.. I will talk about my feeling later on....
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-1 01:27 AM:
因為球證係吹翻第一腳,即係a斬那一腳,... [/quote]
其實你講果問題呢，依家d後衛係兩樣野之間，佢地都會搶左先既，但係如果佢知自己掂左個波包左個越位，佢地d後衛自己知衰左，去追嫁啦。加上依家新例，一日唔掂到唔算越位，所以重要睇埋有冇人後上，有既都包越位都要追啦，因為佢追唔算越位...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wanmankit[/i] at 2005-7-1 07:41 AM:
其實你講果問題呢，依家d後衛係兩樣... [/quote]
咩唔係話影響進攻都算咩??都冇埋la?????
好似冇理...可能我才疏學淺，都唔知有呢條-.-
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wanmankit[/i] at 2005-7-1 08:25 AM:
好似冇理...可能我才疏學淺，都唔知有呢條-.- [/quote]
如果一個球員接應既位置係越位,佢企係度或是向後走,佢就唔算越位,比第二個隊友上黎接應就ok,但係佢一標個波就越位la,.....我睇波係咁
我覺得應該修例,始終由球證自己的判決唔多公平,會猶疑吹定唔吹,如果有例的話球證會更果斷去判決,球員亦無得講,而且會令進攻流暢d,同埋體力化d,對方裝越位會更難...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]skjeiw[/i] at 2005-7-1 08:35 AM:
我覺得應該修例,始終由球證自己的判決... [/quote]
但若果修例定立得太過細微,就會令球賽失去靈活性同樂趣,而且唔只令球賽唔能夠流暢,仲可能搞到d 球證係又吹唔係又吹,始終足球係人既比賽,應由人去決定對或不對
修例一係就\修d大圍d 既野,好似球證舉旗既時間等等
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lookityourself[/i] at 2005-7-1 08:30 AM:
如果一個球員接應既位置係越位,佢企係度或是向後走,佢就唔算越位,比第二個隊友上黎接應就ok,但係佢一標個波就越位la,.....我睇波係咁 [/quote]
總之就係係越位位果條友唔郁或者向後行，咁就唔算越位~後上追波冇事~係越位位果條友去追波又掂到個波就出事，係唔係咁?
球證都係人，難免會有判錯，不如整部電子球證，以精密計算黎計越位啦-.-
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wanmankit[/i] at 2005-7-1 09:00 AM:
總之就係係越位位果條友唔郁或者向... [/quote]
整個球證出黎都唔係淨係計越位ga la,一定計埋犯規
到時我驚成半隊波紅牌,唔洗踢
依家超賤,
你唔拎波佢唔吹,你拎波佢先吹,即係史高斯長傳,雲佬越位但見旁證冇扯旗,由中圈跑到禁區拎波,一掂到波就吹......浪費球員體力,搞到我地冇好波睇.
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-7-1 11:03 AM:
依家超賤,
你唔拎波佢唔吹,你拎波佢... [/quote]
個球證見佢追緊都會舉ga la
in truth, I am the referee..
The linesman gets all the power...
As I am the referee running on the floor, I couldn't see anything that if the player is onside or offside.
So, when the linesman flag up, I will blow the whistle and say that's offside.....
my conclusion is: linesman should be getting the most power in this situation.......
Referee can read the signal and do their part of the job
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2005-7-1 11:08 AM:
in truth, I am the referee..
The l... [/quote]
一路以黎都係旁證舉,球證先可以吹,球證一定唔會比旁證個位好！！！
但今代既旁證好主觀
yes, that's why linesmen are the most important roles nowadays
rather referee.. (oh yeah, except cards .... and goals allow.,...)