娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

michael86 發表於 2005-7-9 01:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-8 01:34 AM:

真的嗎??? [/quote]

我估係卦...因為當年佢都係學徒出身...同碧咸佢地同期..初出道o個陣好有天份
不過後尾俾曼聯變左用黎買高爾既籌碼....

michael86 發表於 2005-7-9 01:50 AM

其實如果呢條中場線有冇發展既可能性呢?


朴智星-費查-奧沙-c朗拿度

ciger 發表於 2005-7-9 01:54 AM

基利士比被賣走的主因係佢係愛爾蘭人,當年因為未發生波士文事件,所有非英倫三島球員要當外援,費SIR唔願意為左一個新人而浪費一個外援名額

michael86 發表於 2005-7-9 01:55 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-9 01:54 AM:
基利士比被賣走的主因係佢係愛爾蘭人,當年因為未發生波士文事件,所有非英倫三島球員要當外援,費SIR唔願意為左一個新人而浪費一個外援名額 [/quote]

基利士比唔係北愛爾蘭人咩........:o

ciger 發表於 2005-7-9 01:56 AM

冇記錯應該係愛爾蘭

michael86 發表於 2005-7-9 01:57 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-9 01:56 AM:
冇記錯應該係愛爾蘭 [/quote]

肯定係北愛呀......:o

ciger 發表於 2005-7-9 02:00 AM

剛查到有網頁話佢係(北愛爾蘭),但我記得佢被賣走的主因係佢要計入外援名額

michael86 發表於 2005-7-9 02:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-9 02:00 AM:
剛查到有網頁話佢係(北愛爾蘭),但我記得佢被賣走的主因係佢要計入外援名額 [/quote]

sure係北愛..至於當年賣走既原因就真係唔知la...

ciger 發表於 2005-7-9 02:21 AM

好似係歐洲賽要計入外援名額,聯賽唔洗

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-9 04:01 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-7-9 01:50 AM:
其實如果呢條中場線有冇發展既可能性呢?


朴智星-費查-奧沙-c朗拿度 [/quote]
奧沙唔清楚,放奧沙不如放阿倫史密夫= ="

kakeidevil 發表於 2005-7-9 09:20 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-9 04:01 AM:

奧沙唔清楚,放奧沙不如放阿倫史密夫= =" [/quote]


放阿倫史密夫...點解唔放菲臘尼維利...
佢可以打多個位置...防守中場更係長項...
雖然國家隊冇乜表現...但o係曼聯就唔同喇...
如果唔係曼聯都唔會同佢績約六年到30歲啦...

michael86 發表於 2005-7-9 11:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-7-9 09:20 AM:



放阿倫史密夫...點解唔放菲臘尼... [/quote]

菲臘仔一時時...
而且踢咁耐都冇大將之風...
相信佢o係曼聯既位置會漸漸淡出....:o

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-9 01:13 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-7-9 11:50 AM:


菲臘仔一時時...
而且踢咁耐都冇大將之風...
相信佢o係曼聯既位置會漸漸淡出....:o [/quote]
冇錯,菲臘仔唔係好掂,仲開始差過以前,英格蘭出親佢都幾乎輸波,雖然話佢踢左咁耐曼聯仲會有返兩度,但我覺得佢未夠班,佢同加利仔相差得太遠:o

清揚 發表於 2005-7-9 01:18 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-9 13:13:

冇錯,菲臘仔唔係好掂,仲開始差過以前,英格蘭出親佢都幾乎輸波,雖然話佢踢左咁耐曼聯仲會有返兩度,但我覺得佢未夠班,佢同加利仔相差得太遠:o [/quote]
加利仔有幾好啫???

kakeidevil 發表於 2005-7-9 02:20 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-9 01:13 PM:

冇錯,菲臘仔唔係好掂,仲開始差過以前,英格蘭出親佢都幾乎輸波,雖然話佢踢左咁耐曼聯仲會有返兩度,但我覺得佢未夠班,佢同加利仔相差得太遠:o [/quote]


你覺得菲臘仔打防守會弱過阿倫史密夫嗎???
我唔認同...

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-9 06:41 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-7-9 02:20 PM:



你覺得菲臘仔打防守會弱過阿倫史密夫嗎???
我唔認同... [/quote]
阿倫史密夫比佢後生,狼同有腳法,呢幾樣已經夠啦~如果菲臘仔係掂既費sir就唔洗買朴智星同軒斯返黎啦~

michael86 發表於 2005-7-9 08:13 PM

菲臘仔其實質素只一般...
而且越踢越沉..
佢只屬於偶有佳作o個一類既球員

瑞比 發表於 2005-7-9 08:20 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-7-9 01:18 PM:

加利仔有幾好啫??? [/quote]
-.-"無左b23之後,,除左c7,giggs好多出波都係由佢做,,d入波都係間接由佢而起

michael86 發表於 2005-7-9 08:30 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]瑞比[/i] at 2005-7-9 08:20 PM:

-.-"無左b23之後,,除左c7,giggs好多出波都係由佢做,,d入波都係間接由佢而起 [/quote]

佢既助攻其實幾好 :lol:

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-9 08:38 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-7-9 08:30 PM:


佢既助攻其實幾好 :lol: [/quote]
對,碧咸係度果時都有碧咸5成,依家都有7成幾既(我估)~

頁: 1 2 [3]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.