娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-12 03:38 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-12 03:13 AM:
佢罰球入球率都相當高,但生波遠射真係唔多,你射得出靚罰球就梗有一定射術,但點解生波遠射唔係咁多,仲少過林柏特,C朗拿度同卡卡等 [/quote]
係曼聯因為佢好似比較少返中間,就算有佢都唔會射,
去到皇馬更加冇得射,我諗係佢新黎驚比教練話,又可能係教練冇叫佢咁做,佢去到皇馬之後係射入過一球遠射,鵝眉月頂射入,仲有一次皇馬輸緊波佢先怒笠龍門,但岩岩高出@@"

ciger 發表於 2005-7-12 03:42 AM

照道理射術好嘅球員教練冇理由唔叫佢起腳,我就覺得係佢擺脫後衛能力唔高,製造唔到空位起腳

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-12 03:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-12 03:42 AM:
照道理射術好嘅球員教練冇理由唔叫佢起腳,我就覺得係佢擺脫後衛能力唔高,製造唔到空位起腳 [/quote]
係囉~我都唔明= ="
唔關事,有時佢有位都唔會射嫁,寧願比返施丹或其他隊友都唔會射,我都唔知點解~~"

ciger 發表於 2005-7-12 03:53 AM

你係電視覺得佢有位(因為平面關係),但佢係場中可能見到後衛只要一申腳,就攔到個波,如果有腳法嘅球員通常會用假動作令對方失位,碧咸就係差這一點

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-12 03:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-12 03:53 AM:
你係電視覺得佢有位(因為平面關係),但佢係場中可能見到後衛只要一申腳,就攔到個波,如果有腳法嘅球員通常會用假動作令對方失位,碧咸就係差這一點 [/quote]
講真,就算真係好空佢都好少會攻,或許真係好似你咁講,其實佢後面有人上緊去攔佢
最難忘果次就係對維拉利爾,全場打得非常生,有得攻就攻,要守就守~完全發揮到身價:lol:

ciger 發表於 2005-7-12 04:02 AM

一場半場就梗有,不過有射術但擺脫唔到後衛就好難幫球隊絕處逢生,人地唔會咁輕易係禁區外犯規比你擺定黎射

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-12 04:19 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-12 04:02 AM:
一場半場就梗有,不過有射術但擺脫唔到後衛就好難幫球隊絕處逢生,人地唔會咁輕易係禁區外犯規比你擺定黎射 [/quote]
冇計,鬼叫唔比佢係右路出波咩~加上有時d人真係鍾意係禁區外犯你喎@@"

step025 發表於 2005-7-12 04:50 AM

佢係好球員
簡單d黎講, d人唔掋得佢唔係最好波但係最出名啫
佢絕對有地位立足,樣討好(特別對女仔),美妙嘅罰球同傳中
但係佢嘅實力大概值10m-12m, 但係成交嗰陣係20+m, 個堆錢就証明咗依家嘅佢一本係實力一半係個名

當時咸嫂係非常出名,世界性嗰隻...佢地兩個稱得上世紀中最識互相利用嘅夫妻

wer 發表於 2005-7-12 07:27 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]pc20001103b[/i] at 2005-7-11 22:32:

你咁講不如話碧咸有施丹既腳法,
咁... [/quote]
我最想聽到你說
[quote]
的確靚仔幫佢唔少
[/quote]
[size=6][color=Green]碧咸唔係廢[/color][/size],但不靠樣可唔可以賺咁多錢

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-12 07:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-7-12 07:27 PM:

我最想聽到你說

[size=6][color=Green]碧咸唔係廢[/color][/size],但不靠樣可唔可以賺咁多錢 [/quote]
賺錢果方面樣當然幫到好多,但如果話佢廢係冇可能的~

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-7-13 02:43 PM

ab仔!我仲以為有人搞事。哈哈~:P

raymond302 發表於 2005-7-13 05:10 PM

I dun think he is a trash. Although he doesn't have fast running and great crossing skill, he has a good passing skill and free kick skill. But now i think his level go downwards. Maybe because he is getting old. Anyway he is not a trash

一樓一 發表於 2005-7-13 05:40 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Dicksonheng 發表於 2005-7-13 05:44 PM

起碼在閱讀球賽方面
好過費高幾千倍
否則佢個仇人 盧森保高 竟然都會重用佢
而棄費高

因為碧咸的傳送,企位及體能真的相當出色

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-13 06:02 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-7-13 02:43 PM:
ab仔!我仲以為有人搞事。哈哈~:P [/quote]
哈哈,如果有人搞事一早鎖左文啦:D

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-13 06:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Dicksonheng[/i] at 2005-7-13 05:44 PM:
起碼在閱讀球賽方面
好過費高幾千倍
否則佢個仇人 盧森保高 竟然都會重用佢
而棄費高

因為碧咸的傳送,企位及體能真的相當出色 [/quote]
乜有仇既咩= ="

一樓一 發表於 2005-7-13 06:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

abc123aa 發表於 2005-7-13 06:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]一樓一[/i] at 2005-7-13 06:22 PM:


記憶中,  big 咸係曼魚時代, 係好... [/quote]
我都想盧森保高比返碧咸打右邊可以進攻><"

ciger 發表於 2005-7-13 09:09 PM

講真吖,碧咸係皇馬嘅問題係死症,冇得搞,之前係其他標題中都講過,碧咸善長傳中,但朗拿度頭搥唔掂,就算比佢打右邊出到波但前鋒入唔到又有咩用,換前鋒就碧咸打法,人地施丹同朗拿度善於打小組,冇理由換兩個球皇級球員去就一個球星,根本唔係誰人唔掂嘅問題,係打法唔夾嘅問題,正如華朗踢曼聯一樣,但碧咸商業價值實在太高,賣走佢又唔願意

Dicksonheng 發表於 2005-7-13 09:25 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-13 06:03 PM:

乜有仇既咩= =" [/quote]

巴西傳媒好耐之前有報導出去
在盧生去皇馬之前
話碧咸只係名過其實, 實唔會畀佢打正選 云云
但佢最終食言,
令到d巴西傳媒o哂嘴...

頁: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.