[quote]Originally posted by [i]Dicksonheng[/i] at 2005-7-13 09:25 PM:
巴西傳媒好耐之前有報導出去
在盧生去皇馬之前
話碧咸只係名過其實, 實唔會畀佢打正選 云云
但佢最終食言,
令到d巴西傳媒o哂嘴... [/quote]
哦~盧森保高果然唔係費sir果類既教練,係以球隊利益行先既教練。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-13 09:09 PM:
講真吖,碧咸係皇馬嘅問題係死症,冇得... [/quote]
其實唔好剩係講傳中...
碧咸既長傳都好arm一d快速既前鋒
至於施丹講真都老la~
以碧咸既踢法起碼多施丹2-3年
長遠黎講碧咸o係皇馬球場上都仲有價值
[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-7-14 13:54:
其實唔好剩係講傳中...
碧咸既長... [/quote]
以皇馬嘅實力,對方後防唔會企得太前,所以就算你長傳有幾準都冇用,因為過唔到頭,除非係施丹果種引球出擊,後衛焗住上前攔佢,就會走漏d前鋒
碧咸果種長傳要反擊時先最有用,圍攻時就好難發揮,但皇馬多數都係圍住人黎打,正因為打法問題,碧咸這兩年先好似沉左好多
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-14 05:24 PM:
以皇馬嘅實力,對方後防唔會企得太前... [/quote]
皇馬條後防通常比人攻得多,咁反擊既機會都會多左,再加埋奧雲呢d快馬真係好殺食,對巴塞就係咁入左粒,
所以如果盧森保高開放埋右邊真係益處多過壞處。
講真如果你話皇馬對住一般球隊係被動,以打反擊為主,咁我都冇野講喇,皇馬比人攻得多,係中場斷攬,被人打反擊,所以特別到肉,因為d球員上唒去,但你經常見到皇馬搓來搓去都搓唔入,係因為對手多數對住佢地都係打陣地戰,反擊機會唔係冇,不過少,以皇馬呢d要爭標球隊係唔可以靠打穩守突擊
唔係話用碧咸唔啱,但碧咸唔係果d可以憑一人之力扭轉局勢嘅球員,要隊友配合,你諗下皇馬條鋒線,連埋後備都冇個頂得,當對手打密集要靠高波時叫邊個去頂,希古拿?柏和定活基治,咁後防又點會冇漏洞,你買咁多人都唔爭在多個有頭搥嘅前鋒
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-14 06:54 PM:
唔係話用碧咸唔啱,但碧咸唔係果d可以... [/quote]
如果碧咸係右路出波未必一定要頂,上次英格蘭係美國踢友誼賽,碧咸傳比奧雲,奧雲都唔係頂入格~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-14 20:59:
如果碧咸係右路出波未必一定要頂,上次英格蘭係美國踢友誼賽,碧咸傳比奧雲,奧雲都唔係頂入格~ [/quote]
好像是門前射入
你睇咁多年波兩邊傳中用頭入波多定用腳多?就算可以用腳,但前鋒冇頭搥都威力大減
[[i] Last edited by ciger on 2005-7-14 at 09:11 PM [/i]]
同埋解決這問題其實唔難,唔放走摩連或補充一個有頭搥前鋒,係人地打密集或打小組發揮唔到時換入場,以施丹同碧咸左右兩邊拉散對手,但依家對方比你出波都唔驚,因為你根本冇人有頭搥
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-7-14 09:05 PM:
好像是門前射入 [/quote]
對~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-14 09:11 PM:
同埋解決這問題其實唔難,唔放走摩連或... [/quote]
冇頭咪用腳囉,皇馬就算買前鋒都唔會買高大型,就算買羅賓奴都係冇頭搥嫁啦= ="
當對方打密集時地波或中腰波往往過唔到後防,身為強隊應該有多元化進攻方法,而且頭搥攻門乃足球基本功,等於打籃球你都要有外圍同內線啦!皇馬頭搥入波,除左施丹外,其餘都係後防球員,咁樣另碧咸的作大大減低
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-15 12:12 AM:
當對方打密集時地波或中腰波往往過唔... [/quote]
咁唯有多試遠射或係禁區外搏下罰球囉~_~"
其實講到這裡,可以總結一句,若果皇馬冇合適球員同碧咸配合,碧咸永遠冇法打回在曼聯時我水準,其七旋斬冇退化,但當隊友把握唔到,你斬到天花龍鳳都冇用,因為勝負關鍵係要入波,而罰球皇馬本身有施丹,卡路士甚至之前嘅費高,有碧咸同冇碧咸只係多個選擇,冇你都唔洗死,所以係皇馬你見唔到碧咸嘅重要性
皇馬係要爭標嘅球隊,唔好話輸,和多幾場都唔掂,只靠球員個人質素而冇整體戰術好容易比人死守完場,甚至靠突擊贏埋添,正因為咁碧咸加盟兩年皇馬反而一個奬都冇
可能因為我係皇馬球迷,睇見都心翕,想佢買人實事求是,而唔係為開拓市場,唔同其他球迷見佢3大皆空反而掩住半邊嘴笑講風谅話
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-15 02:12 AM:
其實講到這裡,可以總結一句,若果皇馬... [/quote]
但係碧咸既罰球成功率比費高同卡路士高好多喎= ="
我都希望皇馬攞到冠軍....
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-15 02:48:
[color=Red]但係碧咸既罰球成功率比費高同卡路士高好多喎[/color]= ="
我都希望皇馬攞到冠軍.... [/quote]
睇唔出
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-15 02:50 AM:
睇唔出 [/quote]
你睇下卡路士係皇馬射入左幾多球罰球先(碧咸黎左之後),
而費高係碧咸黎到之後根本未射入過罰球~咁可以睇到邊個既罰球技術較高:o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-7-15 03:09:
你睇下卡路士係皇馬射入左幾多球罰球先(碧咸黎左之後),
而費高係碧咸黎到之後根本未射入過罰球~咁可以睇到邊個既罰球技術較高:o [/quote]
卡路士通常罰球路程較遠,所以入球率較低係理所當然,而費高係碧咸黎之後射罰球同出場次數都減少,就算3人入球率係碧咸最高亦唔見得高好多,而冇碧咸皇馬亦根本唔憂冇人射罰球
另外唔通你見到碧咸一季除左入幾個罰球就滿足,唔想有更多球員可同佢擦出火花?這就是因為碧咸而睇皇馬同鍾意皇馬而睇皇馬嘅分別
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-7-15 03:48 AM:
卡路士通常罰球路程較遠,所以入球率... [/quote]
就算你係鍾意一隊球隊都會因為某球員先會鍾意某球隊啦,除非果隊球隊既作風你非常鍾意啦~
我唔會因為碧咸入幾球罰球先滿足,因為佢做到既野的確唔多,唔係話唔想佢同其他球隊擦出火花,其實佢已經同球隊開始有火花~你一直都話前鋒冇頭搥就發揮唔到佢既傳送,但係事實係唔係咁???,就算皇馬既前鋒有頭搥都唔會開放右邊出波啦,再加上以前碧咸係曼聯出波都唔會全部係頭搥頂入啦~