[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-4-24 14:21:
防守力比原本右後既人還要高幾皮,原... [/quote]
I know what you are talking about...
Your points, I think a lot and I think that's 50% right
it's similar situation when Gary Neville and David Beckham were playing right side together in Man Utd...
but please look clearly
If Beckham is slow..... and his tackling is REALLY bad (no doubt about it)
there could be one problem.....
Other team players can be the offside track really easily........
If I were manager, I would keep him as right midfield, as a right Wing back/right back to help him together...
Do you think I get some points in here?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:24 PM:
佢講左D乜ar???:mad:
唔好幫到咁出面喎:angry: [/quote]
請問呢篇野比起「[size=4]膠[/size]」呢個字同你[size=4]果堆以為好文言既粗口[/size],邊篇既程度嚴重d呢?
我之前同你嘈既時候我幾時用過「[size=4]膠[/size]」呢個字又或者其他[size=4]自以為好文言既粗口[/size]黎鬧過你?
[size=5]將心比己[/size]啦
[quote][quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-4-21 11:28 PM:
佢點打wing,你話得我相信佢本人都冇... [/quote]
你條友仔又係咁~得罪你咩碧咸??我都講過嫁啦~你肯定係唔抵得人地靚仔個你~同有錢過你~你成日都針對佢??你係咪傻嫁??我唔覺一個翼鋒一定要有速度同腳法囉~碧咸先叫團隊合作~係而家呢個年代~佢仲可以用長傳同罰球黎助攻~唔同人地身體接觸~就巳經可以用長傳做到攻勢~我真係唔覺佢有咩問題囉~仲有~冇腳法冇速度都可以係西甲助攻榜到排第二~掉番黎講~你講果d有speed同腳法既翼有冇咁多次助攻先??~我真係唔覺有咩問題囉~[/quote]
Remember why David Beckham was sent off when England vs Poland in Old Trafford
He made 2 stupid tackles...... within 1 min
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:26 PM:
I know what you are talking about... [/quote]
以事論事,如果碧咸走去打閘既話你認為有幾多人會認同呢?你講既說話係幾好聽幾有point既,不過要將佢變成事實的話可以話係冇可能囉
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:17:
咪一樣~點樣就係講呢個呢...就算係... [/quote]
我有講錯ar???碧咸好好腳法???(小小la,但一定唔好),碧咸好快???(快個好多人,但系頂級聯賽唔算快)碧咸好頂得???(一來小用,二來真系差)
又唔系踩佢,事實來的(某人口中既"瓣瓣掂"起碼三樣唔ok la),掂咪得視野,長傳,死球,落力4樣野~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:28 PM:
Remember why David Beckham was sent off when England vs Poland in Old Trafford
He made 2 stupid tackles...... within 1 min [/quote]
淨係講佢d攔截能力已經唔可以打閘,勁狼,打閘既話佢基本上每分每秒都要攔截咁滯,一定攞紅牌當食生菜咁
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:26 PM:
I know what you are talking about... [/quote]
佢根本就擺黎講嫁啦~因為佢只係針對碧咸~我都知佢想講咩~但係真係笑大左我個口~同埋我好明顯知道佢係冇咩睇皇馬踢波~掉轉黎打??唔好玩啦~
Once again, we're not talking about Market Value, Ching Yeung, please understand it....
(i.e. Midfielder is more market value than Defender)
Ok?!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-4-24 14:33:
佢根本就擺黎講嫁啦~因為佢只係針對碧咸~我都知佢想講咩~但係真係笑大左我個口~同埋我好明顯知道佢係冇咩睇皇馬踢波~掉轉黎打??唔好玩啦~ [/quote]
AGAIN,
PLEASE KEEP SILENT!!!!
I don't want anything come to worst
Please co-operate with us!!!!
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
:angry::angry::angry::angry::angry:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:32 PM:
我有講錯ar???碧咸好好腳法???(小小... [/quote]
速度一定唔快,呢度好多人都知
頭鎚基本上好少用,不過應該唔會好得去邊,因為少用
腳法,何謂腳法先,[size=5]定義係邊?[/size]定義係細哨咁既級數定係香港球員既級數?佢係球場上根本唔需要用到腳法呢樣野,呢點我已經講過[size=5]N[/size]次,而皇馬同曼聯球迷亦都非常清楚
但係據我所知你除左話佢呢三樣野之外,你仲講過廢人乜乜廢人物物....等等既說話,咁唔通呢d就係事實?
唔好意思,我永遠都唔能夠同意碧咸會係廢人呢個[size=6]事實[/size]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:32 PM:
我有講錯ar???碧咸好好腳法???(小小... [/quote]
你條友仔又係咁~得罪你咩碧咸??我都講過嫁啦~你肯定係唔抵得人地靚仔個你~同有錢過你~你成日都針對佢??你係咪傻嫁??我唔覺一個翼鋒一定要有速度同腳法囉~碧咸先叫團隊合作~係而家呢個年代~佢仲可以用長傳同罰球黎助攻~唔同人地身體接觸~就巳經可以用長傳做到攻勢~我真係唔覺佢有咩問題囉~仲有~冇腳法冇速度都可以係西甲助攻榜到排第二~掉番黎講~你講果d有speed同腳法既翼有冇咁多次助攻先??~我真係唔覺有咩問題囉~
我想用番我之前講果d黎答你~解答到你嫁啦呢d
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-4-24 14:32:
我有講錯ar???碧咸好好腳法???(小小... [/quote]
I agree what you are talking about that ~~!!!!
Your points are right!!
:clap::clap::clap::clap:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:30:
以事論事,如果碧咸走去打閘既話你認為有幾多人會認同呢?你講既說話係幾好聽幾有point既,不過要將佢變成事實的話可以話係冇可能囉 [/quote]
未試過叉知ar:mad:
點解艾斯同夏迪都可以做到曾令世人認同既閘,而招式及技巧更多的碧咸不能打,看來是他右中的位置太深入你心中~!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:33 PM:
佢根本就擺黎講嫁啦~因為佢只係針對碧咸~我都知佢想講咩~但係真係笑大左我個口~同埋我好明顯知道佢係冇咩睇皇馬踢波~掉轉黎打??唔好玩啦~ [/quote]
打法如何大家都知~
你唔好出聲住,費住佢又嘈:Pthx:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:37:
你條友仔又係咁~得罪你咩碧咸??我都... [/quote]
[size=6]第4次[/size]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]andy020290[/i] at 2006-4-24 14:37:
你條友仔又係咁~得罪你咩碧咸??我都... [/quote]
LAST WARNING!!!!!
PLEASE LET ABC AND ME TO TALK TO CHING YEUNG!!
SHUT UP!
THANKS!
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:37 PM:
未試過叉知ar:mad:
點解艾斯同夏迪都可以做到曾令世人認同既閘,而招式及技巧更多的碧咸不能打,看來是他右中的位置太深入你心中~! [/quote]
如果佢係得既話,點解冇人提出?你講果兩個球員佢地都係有人叫佢轉型佢先轉型(講明先,我唔識佢地兩個),如果碧咸係適合打閘既話佢一早已經有呢個能力,唔需要打右中場打咁耐,亦都唔需要就費高去打防中,打右閘都得啦,橫掂沙加度都唔係星~
[size=5]一件事還一件事,一兩個球員既case唔可以用返其他球員身上[/size]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-4-24 14:37:
未試過叉知ar:mad:
點解艾斯同夏迪都可以做到曾令世人認同既閘,而招式及技巧更多的碧咸不能打,看來是他右中的位置太深入你心中~! [/quote]
em.... but Ian Harte got a better defensive minded and his tackle is much better than David Beckham
Do you agree with me?
夏迪同艾斯依家發展都唔好，碧咸就仲生存係球壇上～
列斯降班搞到夏迪冇前途？ｎｏ，佢勁就有人要，好似史密夫咁～
哈～仲記得果陣夏迪比碧咸右路放甩～
[quote]Originally posted by [i]tkk2p[/i] at 2006-4-24 12:43 PM:
夏迪同艾斯依家發展都唔好，碧咸就仲... [/quote]
哈哈,球星同球員既分別就係球星總會有一兩處特點令到佢發光發亮.......如果果位球員真係掂的話一早返左生啦
同樣,史密夫打防中係得,但係打得好嗎?當時好多人都話佢可以後上射波,後上助攻,但結果呢???大家都有眼睇:)