娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

lookityourself 發表於 2005-8-19 12:21 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-8-19 12:04 PM:

1.有帶球隊既能力,可以號召球員---... [/quote]
但多數老大哥都做到GALA

清揚 發表於 2005-8-19 12:24 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]lookityourself[/i] at 2005-8-19 12:21:

但多數老大哥都做到GALA [/quote]
Sol Cambell唔系老大哥咩???

lookityourself 發表於 2005-8-19 12:26 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-8-19 12:24 PM:

Sol Cambell唔系老大哥咩??? [/quote]
唔係咁講既........may be 當時既England 只有碧咸一人最internation
世足同歐足先生都令過,but 都係 亞軍

清揚 發表於 2005-8-19 12:33 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]lookityourself[/i] at 2005-8-19 12:26:

唔係咁講既........may be 當時既England 只有碧咸一人最internation
世足同歐足先生都令過,but 都係 亞軍 [/quote]
有幾可後防拎世足同歐足先生ar???

lookityourself 發表於 2005-8-19 12:42 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-8-19 12:33 PM:

有幾可後防拎世足同歐足先生ar??? [/quote]
佢無感染力

清揚 發表於 2005-8-19 12:46 PM

尼斯達,大簡,卡路士有感染力
喇掛,都冇拎世足同歐足先生la

lookityourself 發表於 2005-8-19 12:53 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-8-19 12:46 PM:
尼斯達,大簡,卡路士有感染力
喇掛,都冇拎世足同歐足先生la [/quote]
我唔係講呢樣ar

清揚 發表於 2005-8-19 12:57 PM

講乜???

michael86 發表於 2005-8-19 01:01 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-8-19 10:32 AM:
你地永遠停留在數年前(打入世杯個Free... [/quote]

我地點夠你叻:lol:
我地講野不嬲都冇point架la
你o個d就係道理
你講d野永遠都唔會錯
滿意未?:D

lookityourself 發表於 2005-8-19 01:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-8-19 12:57 PM:
講乜??? [/quote]
碧威起碼好過蘇甘保

michael86 發表於 2005-8-19 01:07 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-8-19 12:04 PM:

1.[color=Red]有帶球隊既能力,可以號召球員---謝拉特、泰利好過碧咸多多聲[/color][/quote]

唔講唔知以為你踢緊英格蘭國家隊tim:lol:
做咩呀?你o係訓練營入面見到阿碧咸哥冇號召力呀??:D

michael86 發表於 2005-8-19 01:09 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-8-19 01:07 PM:


唔講唔知以為你踢緊英格蘭國家隊tim:lol:
做咩呀?你o係訓練營入面見到阿碧咸哥冇號召力呀??:D [/quote]

定係謝拉特同泰利報料俾你聽話碧咸冇號召唔到佢地?:D:D
同埋如果咸哥真係o係佢班隊友面前冇感染力,其他隊友唔服佢既話
佢冇可能做到隊長
因為一隊波既隊長首要條件就係要隊中大部份球員都服佢
唔好以為領隊真係可以隻手遮天:lol:

lks 發表於 2005-8-19 01:10 PM

[quote]
做咩呀?你o係訓練營入面見到阿碧咸哥冇號召力呀??
[/quote]

Good point.

lks 發表於 2005-8-19 01:15 PM

[quote]
因為一隊波既隊長首要條件就係要隊中大部份球員都服
[/quote]

I agree with you because if not then no one listen to his command.Example like Keane,everyone respect and listen to his command even though Keane scold him.

清揚 發表於 2005-8-19 01:40 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-8-19 13:09:


定係謝拉特同泰利報料俾你聽話碧... [/quote]
頂你ar,我識你架,咁火爆既,我仲以為Alan Smith同我Talking添,收斂下la,你嫌我哥偏激我哥又嫌你同人針對佢,呢度傾下計表達下意見架咋,無必要搞到你一拳我又一腳咁ㄚ,好多野兩睇既,我兩兄弟唔like碧咸冇人要你地附和,我地都唔想有人侵佔我地既思考領域......

WARNING
BE CAREFUL FOR YOUR WORDS!!!

BRIGHT
:mad::mad::mad::mad:

[[i] Last edited by brightlee on 2005-8-19 at 04:32 PM [/i]]

清揚 發表於 2005-8-19 01:41 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]lookityourself[/i] at 2005-8-19 13:03:

碧威起碼好過蘇甘保 [/quote]
我覺得謝拉特好過碧咸low

清揚 發表於 2005-8-19 01:49 PM

ar 86兄,你真系要檢討下,系咪一有人批評碧咸就起晒掙咁呢,你覺得碧咸好似你既事ㄚ,我覺得碧咸唔好好似又唔關你事架可???

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-8-19 02:07 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-8-19 13:40:

頂你ar,我識你架,咁火爆既,我仲以為... [/quote]
你從何見到佢有火爆之處?佢自不過係講笑形式話緊你睇野片面。俾起火爆,遠不及你吧!

清揚 發表於 2005-8-19 02:26 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-8-19 14:07:

你從何見到佢有火爆之處?佢自不過係講笑形式話緊你睇野片面。俾起火爆,遠不及你吧! [/quote]
冇野la,一見就比人插,實有少少火既,我唔覺我片面low

清揚 發表於 2005-8-19 02:31 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-8-19 14:07:

你從何見到佢有火爆之處?佢自不過係講笑形式話緊你睇野片面。俾起火爆,遠不及你吧! [/quote]
講笑???有好多是非就系由講笑而起.

頁: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.