[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2005-11-8 11:00 PM:
Ai EXGo
q0JjH&g[Q2a`6x
高達兄,呀CHECSS玩得太過份喇..........13歲小朋友不知天高地厚,清揚兄鬧都有道理~ [/quote]
想向惡人開戰,自己就不能其身不正,同佢一樣咁惡。
W.?)S@3m4N#\'Rw-N
另外CHECSS,我地花咁多口水真係為你好。見你d回應又真係幾失控亂來,大家勸你只係想你繼續係度玩得開心。我地唔想睇住你俾人串俾人圍攻到唔開心。你都話你想繼續係度玩,咁就聽下我地講,佢地開乜戰都唔好加把嘴啦,好唔好? :)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]gundamman678[/i] at 2005-11-8 23:09:
&YHW nZXJI
i*T{JWG-M5K4d2n
想向惡人開戰,自己就不能其身不... [/quote]
SL.|&Au nr B
2UP+E!V}g4G'EE
完全同高達兄想法一致~:D!\&nUIq-`M
^
lT9bKB.?L#L2k
清揚兄,且先冷靜~u1F2R'|-S
CHECSS,stop your childhood playing~
BOYDWAN兄,其實呢度有冇詳盡明確既壇規架?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2005-11-8 23:13:
ihU(?5y3_.v]
iJg)ElG*`xan
完全同高達兄想法一致~:D
清揚兄,且先冷靜~
CHECSS,stop your childhood playing~ [/quote]0K7Dkla:d
唔理ㄚ,條"揸lift"既我忍左好耐,last night仲挑我開"拖",我last night心情靚就可以算,但今晚.........haha~有人照唔忍lu~:lol:(我今晚嗜殺如魔):lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]gundamman678[/i] at 2005-11-8 23:16:
BOYDWAN兄,其實呢度有冇詳盡明確既壇規架? [/quote]a4sd"F }"rN7^r
*{uT:EN
(}([I#O~n1^*M3L
坦白講,世上無一處地方可以有詳盡明確規條,總有漏洞;但所謂"入屋叫人、入廟拜神",你入一個地方玩,都應該遷就該處地方嘅manager,因為人哋真係無義務serve你,你又無pay for 任何嘢,"request" 同 "order" 都係叫"要求",不過分別好大咯~:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-11-8 23:20:Hs!X-Y
gfH2Q:pb
KR:wDB
唔理ㄚ,條"揸lift"既我忍... [/quote];S IJ5}9{myZ
[Fcs(hyYv
哎..........都知你係咁,儘量少句啦~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2005-11-8 23:31:
K!Jne/V@Q
哎..........都知你係咁,儘量少句啦~ [/quote]
車~last night佢挑我先既,我心情靚就扮儍仔堵,今晚,sorry ~NOWAY~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2005-11-8 11:29 PM:
Un}D1u4Wi
坦白講,世上無一處地方可以... [/quote]9h,d%{-DT
p%e\|Z9SpL
我既諗法,其實同機密兄係版務區剛出既post一樣......+{8C7ID].|l
係呢度出現既紛爭,並唔獨獨源於樂生既態度。有一個關鍵點,就係執法是否明確清晰,有法可依? 呢度既問題就係大家都唔太清楚版主執法條尺係點,再加上樂生既態度,就更加令大家質疑佢係咪靠惡治版......
[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2005-11-8 23:29:
nn-Fx\;uu
[color=Red]其實唔好以為讀法律後將法律上的哲學用在日常生活如管理大大小小的事務上會俾人覺得好小題大造好誇張。 其實這是很好很容易被大部份人接受的方法。Sb+X Cy;p
法律上有個標準叫做『reasonableman test』,即是如果要決定者要決定一樣事是否合理的話,例如何謂肥。 那麼人人都會認為那人是肥的話,法律上就會承認那是一般人都認為是肥。[/color]
再講就是用下些政治學上的技倆。
9EG9Z4e tyx
若對一些可能會有爭議的事要作決定時,就要先懂得『搵支持』,例如:先警告,還要『懶客氣』。 接著就是看對方是否懂得收斂,若不就等對方自己再踩深些,然後就一下就ban,之後再公告原因(不是向被ban人解釋)。 這樣做就沒有人再『瓜瓜嘈』點解咁點解咁。 仲會好支持。
)ql/u'r^&zq
z?5W1_
希望版主們會看到並自省下是否適用啦! 以上都是小弟學得並在日常生活實行過的,非常實際的。M5O(l+JBL$?
[/quote]
O"[-q [1B
以上的是小弟的見解,唔知閣下同意與否?:)
大鑊!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]d228216[/i] at 2005-11-8 11:40 PM:9LFSTF.tM!Zz
大鑊! [/quote]
點解咁講?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]gundamman678[/i] at 2005-11-8 11:41 PM:;M,PB6j
j-@"c
-d#I7ZAo:\
a;sEu'E ^w$O
點解咁講? [/quote]7Z$Wu@6Ym*B;}
最唔想見既事, 可能會發生
你話.....樂生劈炮?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]gundamman678[/i] at 2005-11-8 11:43 PM:
你話.....樂生劈炮? [/quote]'}]lp-~
| HR
有可能......如果係....我可能都唔做了...
紛爭既結果係咪一定要咁樣先? 大家都唔玩是唯一出路嗎? 無協商改進既空間咩?
唉~~我就係知會咁先叫你哋停手!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]gundamman678[/i] at 2005-11-8 11:47 PM:
紛爭既結果係咪一定要咁樣先? 大家都唔玩是唯一出路嗎? 無協商改進既空間咩? [/quote]
唔係講笑....我詁最小四個版主集體閃人.....可能就係九台既目的-----------悲
[quote]Originally posted by [i]d228216[/i] at 2005-11-8 23:45::tfL ]Pc
有可能......如果係....我可能都唔做了... [/quote]
"揸lift"既早知今日何必當初呢~mJ*G'@K7?&P
216兄也無需為呢D人唔做~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]d228216[/i] at 2005-11-8 23:45:"S+M7V;x&G)XF p4Z(c
有可能......如果係....我可能都唔做了... [/quote]
咁嚴重,唔駛下嗎? 俾少少建議佢jar!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-11-8 11:54 PM:
"揸lift"既早知今日何必當初呢~+[UYd7U X;Ll:?
216兄也無需為呢D人唔做~ [/quote]$XN-f'j,y
Z
你唔明當日EF 發圍 果陣 上下一心果種壯志....我 upload 3G野上梨為乜??