LMQ 發表於 2005-8-20 09:59 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]michael86[/i] at 2005-8-20 09:57 PM:
o個球頂得太正lu..
龍門arm armo係中間 [/quote]
sorensen今場都救左好多波...
如果唔係肯定唔止入一球
單字一個撚 發表於 2005-8-20 10:00 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-8-20 09:56 PM:
壞習慣不是一朝一夕可改的........... [/quote]
起碼肯改係一件好事呀:mad:
言下之意莫非你睇死佢改唔到?
michael86 發表於 2005-8-20 10:00 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]gigg11[/i] at 2005-8-20 09:59 PM:
曼聯呢場只係打出一般水準
都已經睇... [/quote]
對於我黎講
拎3分對於而家既曼聯黎講係最緊要
要拎返哂d信心返黎就只有贏波
打出好波而失分反而會令隊波士氣大挫
清揚 發表於 2005-8-20 10:00 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]LMQ[/i] at 2005-8-20 21:59:
sorensen今場都救左好多波...
如果唔係肯定唔止入一球 [/quote]
弱旅出門將~弱旅出門將~
michael86 發表於 2005-8-20 10:01 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]LMQ[/i] at 2005-8-20 09:59 PM:
sorensen今場都救左好多波...
如果唔係肯定唔止入一球 [/quote]
D反應好快:lol:
au212001 發表於 2005-8-20 10:01 PM
c維c達踢到一無是處,如果吾係里奧,輸波的可能係曼聯...所以里奧都仲係最強後衛之一
今日中前場猜得幾好,又有耐性,抵讚
LMQ 發表於 2005-8-20 10:02 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-8-20 10:00 PM:
弱旅出門將~弱旅出門將~ [/quote]
真係無野好講...:mad::mad::(:(
to michael86
搞到而家有d憎佢添~
gigg11 發表於 2005-8-20 10:02 PM
今場其實費sir真係算用兵如神既一次
反而上場對愛華....
係有小小運氣成份令對手 輸哂道氣
今場贏一球
但係都收貨~~~
另外值得一提係 連續3場冇失波
雲達沙定哂個後防個心係唔同d
希望keep住
如果入少d波,曼聯可以唔失
我寧願入少d波
tonykwl 發表於 2005-8-20 10:03 PM
我覺得費查始終都係唔多夠班.
LMQ 發表於 2005-8-20 10:06 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]tonykwl[/i] at 2005-8-20 10:03 PM:
我覺得費查始終都係唔多夠班. [/quote]
又唔係唔夠班既
只不過創造能力真係麻麻...
gigg11 發表於 2005-8-20 10:06 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]au212001[/i] at 2005-8-20 10:01 PM:
c維c達踢到一無是處,如果吾係里奧,輸波的可能係曼聯...所以里奧都仲係最強後衛之一
今日中前場猜得幾好,又有耐性,抵讚 [/quote]
其實今場打得最差果個 係施維斯達同 堅尼
其餘12個球員其實都打得好好,做足自己既水準,本份
當中朗尼,星仔,史高斯,費查,特別好
施維施達仲有d 走甩人
希望佢快d回番自己應有既狀態
至於堅尼明顯真係冇咩態
不過始終係隊長既領軍作用,咪到狀態唔好都唔會唔出佢~~~
反而費查有時太勤力搞到堅尼冇波踢咁
清揚 發表於 2005-8-20 10:08 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]LMQ[/i] at 2005-8-20 22:06:
又唔係唔夠班既
只不過創造能力真係麻麻... [/quote]
太苛刻喇,有創造能力的工兵不是工兵
michael86 發表於 2005-8-20 10:10 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]tonykwl[/i] at 2005-8-20 10:03 PM:
我覺得費查始終都係唔多夠班. [/quote]
冇咩大將之風law..
屬於做無名英雄o個隻..
唔會期待佢有咩驚人表現
安份守紀o個隻law:)
LMQ 發表於 2005-8-20 10:10 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-8-20 10:08 PM:
太苛刻喇,有創造能力的工兵不是工兵 [/quote]
以中場球員黎講
無創造力既真係好難打得出名堂
除非你攔截力好強果d就例外
stone86 發表於 2005-8-20 10:12 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]tonykwl[/i] at 2005-8-20 10:03 PM:
我覺得費查始終都係唔多夠班. [/quote]
係呀
佢只是一個好勤力,但不是一個好質素的球員呀
清揚 發表於 2005-8-20 10:14 PM
安份守紀夠la,巴夫斯就系唔明呢點所以成日闖禍
Irreversible 發表於 2005-8-20 10:19 PM
冷笑一下..廢sir真係老啦...
IT14 發表於 2005-8-20 10:21 PM
曼聯呢兩場打4–3–3,出朴智星同雲尼、朗尼打前線,係就係走動多,但係好少落底or成功落底,而朗尼一嬲比較少落底,攪到禁區勁密,無乜位拉開對手防線
所以應該出雲尼、朗尼同C郎打前線,朴智星打落d,頂費查個位,佢專心後上入禁區射波,史高斯專心組織仲好,分工會清楚d!
chicken 發表於 2005-8-20 10:29 PM
費查始終都係費柴, 人如其名
[[i] Last edited by chicken on 2005-8-20 at 10:30 PM [/i]]
lookityourself 發表於 2005-8-20 10:32 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]chicken[/i] at 2005-8-20 10:29 PM:
費查始終都係費柴, 人如其名
[[i] Last edited by chicken on 2005-8-20 at 10:30 PM [/i]] [/quote]
佢都好努力ga la.........
不過朗尼果球地波冷箭最具威脅