[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2005-8-24 03:25:
[color=Red]我話唔同意你個topic,no... [/quote]
一場誤會ja:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]雷公[/i] at 2005-8-24 03:43 AM:
一場誤會ja:) [/quote]
大家都係討論討論姐
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2005-8-24 03:46 AM:
大家都係討論討論姐 [/quote]
假波連足總都呃到
何況你地
好多波都是假................
他們都為了$
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kitkit12345[/i] at 2005-8-24 04:21 AM:
好多波都是假................
他們都為了$ [/quote]
所以意大利一d 無咩錢既球會會有
[quote]Originally posted by [i]雷公[/i] at 2005-8-24 03:21 AM:
你似乎? [/quote]
似乎咩???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2005-8-24 03:46 AM:
大家都係討論討論姐 [/quote]
喔,誤會左雷公你真係唔好意思:P
[quote]Originally posted by [i]mitsuilam[/i] at 2005-8-24 00:11:
2004年歐國杯分組賽
丹麥vs瑞典
2-2
令意大利出唔到線 [/quote]
it's impossible
if you watched what's happened in live.....
Or, if you are Italian fans...
then I should "shut up"
Cos I was watching both matches on live together......
If you are blaming that when Denmark draw with Sweden
Why Italy, they used all of their hearts and energy
couldn't score 2 goals until injury time?
What's the score about between Denmark vs Bulguria, and Sweden vs Bulguria before?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2005-8-24 06:17 AM:
it's impossible
if you watched w... [/quote]
同意...如果有睇丹麥對瑞典場波...
就會知究竟係唔係假..
首先...當丹麥贏2:1之後...
仍然有好多攻勢...
有兩三個致命射門...
但比瑞典龍門救到...
最重要係瑞典係在補時先射得入2:2...
如果佢地兩隊一早講定要2:2...
你係瑞典隊你肯唔肯丫...
到補時先追平呀??
果球射失點算??
所以証明話呢場波係假既人...
基本上係無睇呢場波...
如果睇左都話假...
我都唔知講乜好...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2005-8-24 06:17 AM:
it's impossible
if you watched w... [/quote]
條友無野講令野黎講
呢個世界除左假波之外仲有好彩既
[quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2005-8-24 08:11 AM:
同意...如果有睇丹麥對瑞典場波..... [/quote]
我有睇....意大利嗰場波我都有同時間睇....
我都唔覺丹麥嗰場係假波....雖然開咗個好似內定嘅賽果....
睇見卡斯辛奴個樣真係心都噏呀....
我同意係有假波存在....大家可以從報章上睇到有幾多個國家有黑哨嘅出現~
就連四大聯賽都有兩個國家涉嫌有黑哨~
有d重証實埋添....
我都好同意之前有位會員所講...
球員踢假波係有可能被迫嘅...
大家睇吓d巴西球員喺本土聯賽踢出名堂之後d屋企人週不時被人綁架就畧知一二~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-8-23 08:30 PM:
x2... [/quote]
X3
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
有個問題﹐如果有一支球隊參加左一項
正式賽事,事後卻後悔﹐但為左面子又
唔可以早早出局﹐所以留到決賽放軟手
腳故意輸波﹐算唔算假﹖
(講緊拉科及華倫西亞)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]gogo8281[/i] at 2005-8-24 18:34:
有個問題﹐如果有一支球隊參加左一項
... [/quote]
or you can talk about Parma in UEFA cup semi-final last year.......
[quote]Originally posted by [i]gogo8281[/i] at 2005-8-24 04:34 PM:
有個問題﹐如果有一支球隊參加左一項
... [/quote]
又唔係假波甘嚴重lo..可以話係冇盡力
但都唔o岩la...球迷梗係想睇好波ga la...
冇盡力咪唔好睇lo...
好似帕爾馬上季甘....出d青年軍打協,
聯賽又爭d降班
帕爾馬d Fans咪唔happy lo...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-8-24 18:57:
又唔係假波甘嚴重lo..可以話係冇盡... [/quote]
Well, I would say they may not put 100% effort on some matches ....
I give you 2 more examples:
in 2002-03 season
Arsenal 6-1 Southampton
both of them were in FA Cup final
Arsenal lost the champion to Man Utd. Southampton can be playing in UEFA next season...
They were more relaxing to play that game... so the score was that high
in 2004-2005 season
Arsenal 7-0 Everton
Well, Arsenal was 2nd and Everton could be 3rd or 4th
it won't effect they can play in European Championship this season.....
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2005-8-24 05:04 PM:
Well, I would say they may not ... [/quote]
當然一定有例外啦
不過兩面都冇野爭而唔盡力玩玩下先有呢種例外,場波有機會好多入波,更加有d悅目技術睇tim...:)
但有種情况一定冇例外,就係一面唔盡力,一面博命,場波會一面倒兼且好悶(因寫佔上風o個隊入完兩球等收工開始差波,唔盡力o個隊又唔迫),
上面parma就係甘....
見住自己愛隊比人噤住來打,
唔好受...
[[i] Last edited by adamjacky123 on 2005-8-24 at 05:27 PM [/i]]
踢爆拉脫維亞收俄軍錢打假波
「清高」隊長壞兩國好事
24/08/2005
拉脫維亞國家隊隊長艾斯達捷夫斯尋日爆大鑊，話月中對俄羅斯世界杯外圍賽，賽前俄羅斯有代表向拉脫維亞足總及各拉脫維亞球員派錢，要求佢輸波，艾斯達捷夫斯仲話賄款數目好吸引添，不過呢位老牌隊長就「唔生性」，替球隊先開紀錄，最後雙方一比一言和，唔通佢冇份收錢？至於雙方足總當然例牌否認，件事肯定有排查，不過俄羅斯球隊艾斯達捷夫斯得罪晒兩邊足總，睇來都要搵定會轉啦！
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2005-8-24 01:13 AM:
咁以後3:3,4:4,4:3依d比數
唔洗睇lu............
一定係假波 [/quote]
你有無睇過利物浦對阿拉維斯果場波先？？
果場我睇住阿拉維斯個摩蘭奴射罰球（軟弱無力既地波）呀，利物浦擺４個人場全部跳起晒，４條友望住個波ｏ係腳底碌過，最抵死係杜迪克連波皮都揩唔到呀，咁就４比４，跟住利物浦加時先ｋｏ對手咋！！！