wer 發表於 2005-8-29 08:35 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]雷公[/i] at 2005-8-29 20:32:
算吧啦,講番張紅牌算啦 [/quote]
希望有人可以
blu_ray 發表於 2005-8-29 08:36 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]雷公[/i] at 2005-8-29 08:32 PM:
算吧啦,講番張紅牌算啦 [/quote]
好
一人讓一步
見你打左咁多字, 我都唔想搞亂你呢個post
不過我回埋無point人一個回覆先
abwong886 發表於 2005-8-29 08:36 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-8-29 08:34 PM:
不合理的指控 [/quote]
好似係邊道睇過這句野
wer 發表於 2005-8-29 08:38 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]blu_ray[/i] at 2005-8-29 20:36:
好
一人讓一步
見你打左咁多字, 我都唔想搞亂你呢個post
不過我回埋無point人一個回覆先 [/quote]
係就快d
wer 發表於 2005-8-29 08:39 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]雷公[/i] at 2005-8-29 20:32:
算吧啦,講番張紅牌算啦 [/quote]
我非常生氣,原本可以守和車仔
blu_ray 發表於 2005-8-29 08:39 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-8-29 08:34 PM:
不合理的指控 [/quote]
你呃post 果d post唔洗我quote番曬出黎呀, 想做死我咩
成個sports版吹水版都係咁呃啦
唔係以為走得甩呀;)
wer 發表於 2005-8-29 08:41 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]blu_ray[/i] at 2005-8-29 20:39:
你呃post 果d post唔洗我quote番曬出黎呀, 想做死我咩
成個sports版吹水版都係咁呃啦
唔係以為走得甩呀;) [/quote]
有就post出黎,咪系度嘈
abwong886 發表於 2005-8-29 08:41 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]blu_ray[/i] at 2005-8-29 08:39 PM:
你呃post 果d post唔洗我quote番曬出黎呀, 想做死我咩
成個sports版吹水版都係咁呃啦
唔係以為走得甩呀;) [/quote]
乜你成日留意佢架:):cool:
wer 發表於 2005-8-29 08:45 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abwong886[/i] at 2005-8-29 20:41:
乜你成日留意佢架:):cool: [/quote]
錯LA強兄,他根本就沒證據,他吹水
abwong886 發表於 2005-8-29 08:46 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-8-29 08:45 PM:
錯LA強兄,他根本就沒證據,他吹水 [/quote]
真係,如果佢有,你會點?
wer 發表於 2005-8-29 08:47 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abwong886[/i] at 2005-8-29 20:46:
真係,如果佢有,你會點? [/quote]
有先算
blu_ray 發表於 2005-8-29 08:49 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]雷公[/i] at 2005-8-29 07:21 PM:
[color=Blue]米度[/color]絕對唔值得... [/quote]
呢單野相信球會可以上訴得藉
不過要罰個球證就無乜可能
球證錯誤一向係足球既一部份
之前都好多人講過
有時踢少個反而好d, 打反擊或者死守守和
有時會輸到貼地
一場波會發生咩事無人估到
所以無咩話邊隊抵唔抵
作為車仔迷我都唔想咁樣贏
不過足球就係咁
天時地利人和睇你有幾多
abwong886 發表於 2005-8-29 08:56 PM
我都係車仔球迷,
只有車仔贏到就得,唔洗理佢點贏
加上車仔質素又好,
要扲三冠王,冇問題
leeyanta 發表於 2005-8-29 08:57 PM
我係車迷都唔幫你.. blu_ray你的確係offtopic..
講番張牌.. 我都覺唔應該紅.. 而家搞到個個都認為係車仔收買左個裁判
我都覺車仔未有番上年既水準.. 呢幾場波都打得唔好..
熱刺如果唔係打少個我相信會難打好多.. 所以車仔要快d打番起ar
brianchy 發表於 2005-8-29 08:58 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]blu_ray[/i] at 2005-8-29 08:49 PM:
呢單野相信球會可以上訴得藉
不... [/quote]
話分兩頭...[color=Red]關鍵在於10人應戰嗰隊係主場定係作客,呢個係好大因素[/color]..
如果10人應戰嗰隊係主場,多數都唔會同你死守,點都想贏
所以唔會打死守龜縮架戰術,點都會攻,後防一定有空位,
11人嗰隊就有好明顯著數左好多
如果10人應戰嗰隊係作客,多數會同你死守,因為佢地會覺得10人應戰兼作客
攞1分都有交代,所以會打死守龜縮,敢主場打多個架返而唔著數,
人地打10-0-0戰術,係難入波d
leeyanta 發表於 2005-8-29 08:59 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abwong886[/i] at 2005-8-29 08:56 PM:
我都係車仔球迷,
只有車仔贏到就得,唔洗理佢點贏
加上車仔質素又好,
要扲三冠王,冇問題 [/quote]
你咁講就唔好.. 車仔本身質素高咁又點.. 只要無態就保持唔到王者既風範
大家鐘意車仔都係因為車仔既漂亮組織.. 今年就小左好多.. 希望黎緊車仔會打好d..
打番多d靚組織
wer 發表於 2005-8-29 09:00 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abwong886[/i] at 2005-8-29 20:56:
我都係車仔球迷,
只有車仔贏到就得,唔洗理佢點贏
加上車仔質素又好,
要扲三冠王,冇問題 [/quote]
收買都得?:o
blu_ray 發表於 2005-8-29 09:00 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-8-29 08:47 PM:
有先算 [/quote]
[url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=34495&fpage=1&highlight=&page=84[/url] #4197
[url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=76212&fpage=1[/url] #6
[url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=76798&fpage=1&highlight=&page=2[/url] #89
[url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=74628&fpage=1&highlight=&page=106[/url] 呢版無限咁多
仲要唔要?
abwong886 發表於 2005-8-29 09:00 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-8-29 09:00 PM:
收買都得?:o [/quote]
唔得
wer 發表於 2005-8-29 09:04 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]blu_ray[/i] at 2005-8-29 21:00:
[url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/... [/quote]
[size=5][color=Blue]無理的指控[/color][/size]