娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

gogo8281 發表於 2005-9-6 04:41 PM

可唔可以講係習慣﹐英格蘭足總好似
中意搵較為溫和既領隊。
試下回憶一下﹐可曾出現過對球員強
硬既領隊﹖艾歷臣﹑GELAHAM TAYLOR﹑
奇雲基緊甚至BOBBY ROBSON﹐都係惡
唔出樣。
如果搵一個能夠力排眾議既領隊﹐會否有
幫助﹖

brightlee 發表於 2005-9-6 04:50 PM

The major problem is: in England, Media could effect a lot ..... England International team.

That's why Brain Clough had 2 chances in 80s to take over England International.
Finally he didn't get this job due to the pressure from media....

That's only ONE England coach who has a bad relationship with media,
and he got a good result:

SIR Jack Ramsey

Jeans 發表於 2005-9-6 05:18 PM

艾歷臣指三名星級中場分工混亂

6, September, 2005
事緣英格蘭領隊艾歷臣指國家隊三名星級中場碧咸、謝拉特及林柏特在場上分工混亂,負責的工作全部一樣,碧咸經常移入中路,而謝拉特及林柏特又無法堵塞中場漏洞,艾歷臣希望三人盡快解決分工問題。

Sven-Goran Eriksson has revealed how he told David Beckham, Steven Gerrard and Frank Lampard their midfield confusion must end once and for all.

Rather than having his hand forced by player power, the reality is that Eriksson's meeting with his senior midfield trio last Tuesday saw him express his frustration at their displays against Denmark.

With Beckham drifting inside from his right wing role too often in Copenhagen, while Lampard and Gerrard were unable to plug the defensive gaps, the England coach made the decision to switch formations for Saturday's World Cup qualifier against Wales.

The trio's midfield partnership seemed to work much better in the 1-0 victory in Cardiff, with Beckham resolutely sticking to his holding role.

However, while Eriksson may still revert to 4-4-2 in the future, the England coach revealed the truth behind last Tuesday's meeting at the team's St Albans hotel.

"Before the Denmark game we'd played 4-4-2 and they did it extremely well. But as soon as we got into trouble against Denmark, there were three of them doing the same kind of job," he said.

"Because of that, I took them in on Tuesday and said we had to sort it forever, that they couldn't all do the same job.

"We had filter-004ions about it and what solution we could find. After listening to them, I decided to play like we did against Wales."

No wonder Beckham was so disciplined, the England captain previously prone to moving in from his right flank in search of the ball rather than staying out wide.

"He did it rather well in the first half against Denmark but not when we got into trouble. But against Wales, the team were more balanced, at least for more than one hour," said Eriksson.

He admitted it is tempting to retain that formation against Northern Ireland on Wednesday, although Michael Owen's return after suspension makes a 4-4-2 formation more likely, with Shaun Wright-Phillips dropped unless Joe Cole fails to recover from a slight calf strain.

"If you talk about Gerrard, Lampard, Beckham and Cole, they've played many games together in a 4-4-2 formation very well," added Eriksson.

"But against Wales, all the team defended very well. Wales had only one chance to score and the team was very balanced. There was no confusion at all about what to do.

"When David Beckham gets the ball [in a central role], he has more time and he has all the pitch. Offensively, he's one of the best.

"Frank Lampard and Steven Gerrard also did well. That was Steven's first game in two weeks while Frank is always good. He's not in top form yet for us or Chelsea but once he gets there, he'll stay there for the rest of the season."

scorerhk 發表於 2005-9-6 05:19 PM

版主無需動氣,
問題不在於球員能力,而是名氣,
我想大家都有聽過一d言論話,有d領隊在傳媒壓力下同為保自己飯碗的心態上.會作出自保的不理智決定,就係用名牌球員輸波好過用新仔輪波,責任上無咁大

艾生依然係在意奧雲先有咁既決定,在對丹麥佢唔係無用新人嘗試代替奧雲,而係佢對新人表現不滿意,
但佢在對威爾斯變陣,係想試SWP定求其取勝就唔知啦

skjeiw 發表於 2005-9-6 05:22 PM

慘呀...以為呢三個中場可以屈晒機...點知...

清揚 發表於 2005-9-6 05:29 PM

用謝拉特專注防務,林伯特打番自己,條右路比番件7号斬波咪ok low,艾力臣先生,你系教頭黎架,膠少陣當幫忙la.....

chungngo 發表於 2005-9-6 05:48 PM

I think he  manage England very bad

skjeiw 發表於 2005-9-6 05:52 PM

越教越差...佢成日為一兩個人呢變陣..完全唔理人地慣唔慣..呢點係不能容忍

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-6 11:19 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-6 03:30 PM:

艾歷臣明知奧雲停賽,對威爾斯唔出得... [/quote]
我都話佢可能係慘敗丹麥先至諗埋呢d咁既野出黎........:o

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-6 11:21 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]scorerhk[/i] at 2005-9-6 05:19 PM:
版主無需動氣,
問題不在於球員能力,... [/quote]
事實上英格蘭d球員,名氣大既踢得比較好,唔係話名氣細既踢得唔好,但係仲未係時候做正選,我諗佢用SWP未必全部係因為想試佢~

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-6 11:21 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]skjeiw[/i] at 2005-9-6 05:52 PM:
越教越差...佢成日為一兩個人呢變陣..完全唔理人地慣唔慣..呢點係不能容忍 [/quote]
成日???n年冇變過陣wo= ="

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-6 11:22 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-9-6 05:29 PM:
用謝拉特專注防務,林伯特打番自己,條右路比番件7号斬波咪ok low,艾力臣先生,你系教頭黎架,膠少陣當幫忙la..... [/quote]
人地冇名你叫???
你掉轉左啦,應該係林柏特做防守,謝拉特專注進攻,碧咸斬返波,絕對比4-5-1好~

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-6 11:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Jeans[/i] at 2005-9-6 05:18 PM:
6, September, 2005
事緣英格蘭領隊... [/quote]
咁睇就知球員唔慣4-5-1啦,碧咸同謝仔都係打慣4-4-2既....一時之間叫佢地適應4-5-1係冇可能既事黎= ="

ciger 發表於 2005-9-6 11:43 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-6 23:19:

我都話佢可能係慘敗丹麥先至諗埋呢d咁既野出黎........:o [/quote]
英格蘭慘敗於丹麥腳下係個別球員問題,上半場4-4-2發揮絕對正常,下半場輸係占士,格連莊臣犯錯,根本唔關陣式事,作為一個專業領隊應該知道轉陣係於事無補,只要唔出占士,格連莊臣就冇問題

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-6 11:54 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-6 11:43 PM:

英格蘭慘敗於丹麥腳下係個別球員問... [/quote]
但佢唔係咁諗呢,佢可能以為連個陣都係有問題,但佢已經冇選占士.....哈哈,依家格連莊臣都比楊格取代左:)

ciger 發表於 2005-9-7 12:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-6 23:54:

但佢唔係咁諗呢,佢可能以為連個陣都係有問題,但佢已經冇選占士.....哈哈,依家格連莊臣都比楊格取代左:) [/quote]
唔通你都覺得對丹麥上半場個4-4-2陣同球員配搭唔掂,我諗艾歷臣都唔會,佢不過係唔敢出迪科爾打正選,而要夾梗轉陣騰出多個中場位比胡禮菲臘斯,因為佢唔敢唔出碧咸,若碧咸冇傷冇病唔退休胡禮菲臘斯有排都冇得出,佢先要轉陣就胡禮菲臘斯,但係排陣係因人而排,定先排陣後選人呢,如果你隊波有大哨,阿祖,舒夫真高同雲佬你又會唔會排4-2-4呢,又或因狀態而出2個前鋒呢

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-7 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-7 12:05 AM:

唔通你都覺得對丹麥上半場個4-4-2陣... [/quote]
4-4-2陣不嬲都冇問題,打左咁多年,依家先話有問題係唔係有d白痴呢???球員黎講都係格連莊臣有問題啫,下半場又冇啦啦換占士入黎,死得更加快,我諗佢唔會狂用4-5-1黎就SWP啩,係人都知佢係國家隊要正選要等碧咸退休嫁啦......雖然佢係勁,但唔應該用個陣去就一個球員,試一次已經夠啦,
如果我你講果d前鋒我都唔會出4-2-4啦下話,有腦既都知點擺啦~:o

ciger 發表於 2005-9-7 12:22 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-7 00:16:

4-4-2陣不嬲都冇問題,打左咁多年,依... [/quote]
問題就係4-4-2陣不嬲都冇問題,但佢走去轉陣??為乜?
試陣就對上一場試啦,依家同波蘭D分咬得咁緊,每一場波都應該審慎處理

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-7 12:32 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-7 12:22 AM:

問題就係4-4-2陣不嬲都冇問題,但佢走去轉陣??為乜?
試陣就對上一場試啦,依家同波蘭D分咬得咁緊,每一場波都應該審慎處理 [/quote]
為乜就佢自己先知~或許佢信心好大

gogo8281 發表於 2005-9-7 09:07 PM

林柏特﹑謝拉特@球會職責都係進攻為主
到左國家隊兩個人都係好攻輕守﹐不太願
意只係防守﹐導致中場失去屏障使後防壓
力增加。所以艾生先會嘗試4-5-1將碧咸擺
中路就係希望佢多多參與防守而佢亦交足
功課。但問題係防守始終唔係佢強項﹐對
威爾士都仲係冇問題﹐但當進入世界杯就
可能要面對阿根廷﹑墨西哥等世界一流強
隊就非常不足。
如果轉返4-4-2﹐林﹑謝兩人坐中﹐碧咸打
返右路﹐問題依然未解決﹐林﹑謝邊個守
邊個攻﹖就睇艾生魄力夠唔夠﹐兩人二選
其一﹐換一個防守力強既後腰﹐不過恐怕
壓力唔小﹐尤其係球迷及媒體。

頁: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.