娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

scorerhk 發表於 2005-9-8 03:22 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-8 03:09 PM:

但昨晚胡禮菲臘斯表現好過謝拉特同林柏特,對住北愛爾蘭,就算出二線球員但係fit嘅都ok啦,因為北愛d球員去到英超2線都冇,係得個基利士比好d [/quote]

唔好意思我無睇live,所以唔係好知佢地既表現同狀態......thx

wer 發表於 2005-9-8 03:30 PM

艾歷臣只顧大牌
抵輸

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-8 03:31 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]scorerhk[/i] at 2005-9-8 02:57 PM:


踢4-5-1,就出SWP,但是奧雲出翻黎... [/quote]
同意

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-8 03:32 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-8 03:05 PM:

對住巴西阿根廷就要出謝拉特同林柏... [/quote]
咪係,仲要換祖高爾出黎都係咁打先死= =".....

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-8 03:32 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]scorerhk[/i] at 2005-9-8 03:08 PM:


係亞板主,未就係靠碧生係補時個腳... [/quote]
哦,醒目呀,係咁搏罰球^^
我懷疑我失億= ="....02年d野忘記晒........叫我ab仔啦:P:D

au212001 發表於 2005-9-8 04:12 PM

其實而家最大的問題係搵吾到入波的辦法..冇頭冇尾...
如果打番442,希望可以打多d2隻翼..同埋可以俾次機會查爾頓前鋒""達倫賓特""..
因為佢的態應該係咁多個前鋒最好的一個...雖然冇經驗...但當年的owen都係咁打起嫁o者
而且前線死氣沉沉..俾機會佢等於俾機會英格蘭衝擊下前線上的生氣....
仲有最大的問題....次次落後的情況,艾歷臣都吾肯放多1至2個的正前鋒落場..
往往中場換中場,,前鋒換前鋒...在落後的情況下,打少個後衛都要嫁啦...
但係對巴西8強,葡萄牙4強..都沒有e個換人的方針....我對e點都幾失望.....

艾榮 發表於 2005-9-8 04:13 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]雷公[/i] at 2005-9-8 01:54 PM:
英格蘭個個都係世界頂級球員呢種想法... [/quote]

同意...睇下第二條trend, 投票邊對可以同巴西鍊過, 居然有10+人投英格蘭, 僅次於阿根廷同荷蘭. 無疑英格蘭係強隊之一, 球員質素會比捷克同葡萄牙好(始終覺得呢兩隊來來去去都係幾個高質素球員, 冇英格蘭咁個個位都有有質素ge球員踢, 更加不及荷蘭同意大利), 但係有質素 =/= 頂級

chicken 發表於 2005-9-8 07:37 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-8 03:05 PM:

對住巴西阿根廷就要出謝拉特同林柏... [/quote]

Etoo VS Owen, you say which is better in Headling, Ball Holding & Strength?
Barcelona and Chelsea use 451/433 because they have a power striker.

Owen is not power striker, he is a fast forward, best used for counter attack and
break offside trap.

But N.Ireland will not let Owen have any space to run. So I doubt Erikson knows what are the advantages and disadvantages of his players.

Charcoal_henry 發表於 2005-9-8 08:31 PM

其實我認為同世界頂級勁旅比..... eg. 巴西, 阿根廷, 意大利.....

英格蘭始終都係未到佢地既level, 頂多係歐洲一線尾既球隊.....

大家諗下 羅賓奴+阿祖安奴 vs 朗尼+迪科爾, 邊個combination勁d?
其實england 同 brazil 呢d 屈機球隊逐個秤都被比下去啦.....

所以有咁既result都係預左

ciger 發表於 2005-9-8 09:07 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]chicken[/i] at 2005-9-8 19:37:


Etoo VS Owen, you say which is ... [/quote]
其實係唔係power striker唔緊要,最緊要係中場有冇支援,北愛爾蘭唔會比空間奧雲,即係奧雲引到北愛防守球員mark佢,咁中場球員就實有空間入楔,但呢場波謝拉特同林柏特有幾多次後上埋門?中場防守由碧咸負責,佢地唔助攻做乜?如果佢地多d入楔英格蘭等於有3個前鋒,唔入楔英格蘭就只係單箭頭,你睇巴西名義上就雙箭頭,但肯起腳射門球員起碼6-7個,你係後衛點mark?英格蘭有能力射門球員有朗尼,奧雲,碧咸,謝拉特同林柏特,但佢地有幾多個有起腳?加歷查都有射門啦,謝拉特呢?唔射又點入波呢

skjeiw 發表於 2005-9-8 09:10 PM

呢家英格蘭對住d魚腩先贏到ga la...睇到都心傷

發表於 2005-9-8 10:49 PM

英格蘭d前鋒(奧雲,朗尼,廸科爾)個個身材矮小, 但打法好多時由右邊斬中, 似乎唔係好適合. 如果高治或希基斯可以出可能會好d.

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-8 11:39 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]au212001[/i] at 2005-9-8 04:12 PM:
其實而家最大的問題係搵吾到入波的辦... [/quote]
同意><"

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-8 11:39 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]誠[/i] at 2005-9-8 10:49 PM:
英格蘭d前鋒(奧雲,朗尼,廸科爾)個個身材矮小, 但打法好多時由右邊斬中, 似乎唔係好適合. 如果高治或希基斯可以出可能會好d. [/quote]
高治還可以,希斯基就.......:o

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-8 11:40 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-8 09:07 PM:

其實係唔係power striker唔緊要,最... [/quote]
咪係,林柏特都射過一腳啦,謝拉特就........好似驚入波咁= ="

chicken 發表於 2005-9-9 12:13 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-8 09:07 PM:

其實係唔係power striker唔緊要,最... [/quote]

No midfields support because owen cannot hold the ball well and waiting others to run. If you lose the ball fast, others have no enough time to support.

scorerhk 發表於 2005-9-9 12:27 AM

其實謝拉特傷瘉,狀態未足,加上與林柏特,碧咸分工不清,先令到中場咁亂

ciger 發表於 2005-9-9 12:28 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]chicken[/i] at 2005-9-9 00:13:


No midfields support because owen cannot hold the ball well and waiting others to run. If you lose the ball fast, others have no enough time to support. [/quote]
足球上有一樣野叫做走位,如果你有睇巴西對智利阿祖入第一球,朗拿度冇掂波但牽引住智利d後衛,比阿祖起腳,但你睇英格蘭,你有冇見過兩位'阿特'上前幫手?奧雲速度快,如果佢多走位,一定有空間製造出黎比佢地,而且進攻中場唔係只接應前鋒回傳,兩邊出波佢地都要入禁區幫手,你又有冇見佢地有吖?

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-9 12:35 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-9 12:28 AM:

足球上有一樣野叫做走位,如果你有睇... [/quote]
平時佢地兩個係球會都有做,但係係國家隊就.........:o

ciger 發表於 2005-9-9 12:44 AM

有人話英格蘭班球員狀態唔好,但我覺得佢地唔係生理上狀態唔好,係心理上狀態唔好,即係有氣有力但位置唔慣所以無所適從,所以胡禮菲臘斯,A高爾等冇問題,但林柏特謝拉特就位置重疊,唔知點算好,搞到行行企企,冇乜建樹

頁: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.