[quote]Originally posted by [i]lookityourself[/i] at 2005-9-11 04:49 PM:
我做仲好....:D:D
你地想幾比幾就話我知 [/quote]
$1000一球~
入唔到都判12碼
[quote]Originally posted by [i]YUEN_LOUIS[/i] at 2005-9-11 04:58 PM:
$1000一球~
入唔到都判12碼 [/quote]
$2000一張黃牌
$3000一張紅牌
贏左就$8000
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lookityourself[/i] at 2005-9-11 05:03 PM:
$2000一張黃牌
$3000一張紅牌
贏左就$8000 [/quote]
比錢買黃牌:D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-11 16:47:
新例出左用乜鬼野舊例呀,個球証又係多餘既 [/quote]
果球問題係朗拿度真係太近個波,而且佢又積極去攞波,臨起腳先讓比羅賓奴,再加上佢絕對影響到對方後衛同賽事進行,所以球證都應該要吹,怪球證不如怪自己後防,第二球柏和完全係白痴嘅典範,第三球個後衛又判決錯誤頂空氣,反而卡斯拿斯我覺得ok,十二碼都救到,3球波都唔係好關佢事
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-11 05:35 PM:
果球問題係朗拿度真係太近個波,而且... [/quote]
對,你又講得岩,卡斯拿斯係打得ok既,只不過係冇平時咁勁啫,再加上班後防真係........= ="
睇完昨晚場波,又諗返烏滋別克對巴林,有一個問題諗到,如果紐尼斯佢係射十二碼起腳前已經走入禁區,跟住由佢執雞,咁球證應該當入定重射十二碼呢,但兩種情況都係犯規那對有着數,真係唔知點判
俾個罰球皇馬囉.........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kyleung[/i] at 2005-9-11 17:59:
俾個罰球皇馬囉......... [/quote]
咁咪重賽?
烏茲別克要重賽俾人老屈架ja....
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-11 05:54 PM:
睇完昨晚場波,又諗返烏滋別克對巴林,... [/quote]
個球証睇到先奇,我懷疑佢盲既,又冇主見啫= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-11 04:43 PM:
新例唔係話要掂到個波先判越位既咩:o [/quote]
新例只適用於國際足協
歐洲足協堅持唔跟國際足協用新例
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-11 04:40 PM:
的確係呀佢,皇馬果球12碼都係旁證話比球証聽既= =".....
仲有呀,羅賓奴有球波雖然大哨越左位,但係佢冇掂到個波既,羅賓奴射入左竟然話唔入:o [/quote]
呢個吹越位其實都正常
呢球波朗拿度好明顯係有意識去追波,甚至有d幫羅賓奴做阻檔
所以球證舉旗都冇乜問題呀
況且新例只識用於國際足協
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-11 08:04 PM:
個球証睇到先奇,我懷疑佢盲既,又冇主見啫= =" [/quote]
好似新黎報到搵個旁證照住
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-11 04:43 PM:
新例唔係話要掂到個波先判越位既咩:o [/quote]
因為朗拿度擋一擋個守衛, 羅賓奴先可以o係無人看管之下射入
so 皇馬有因為朗拿度而得益
[quote]Originally posted by [i]donald15[/i] at 2005-9-11 11:17 PM:
新例只適用於國際足協
歐洲足協堅... [/quote]
咁都要分歐洲同國際,真係膠膠地:o
你講果d我都知,可惜我太緊張= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lookityourself[/i] at 2005-9-11 11:20 PM:
好似新黎報到搵個旁證照住 [/quote]
似呀:lol:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]donald15[/i] at 2005-9-11 23:17:
新例只適用於國際足協
歐洲足協堅... [/quote]
我覺得新舊例都要吹
差唔多la,有前冇後系咁架la!