[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-14 07:24 PM:
昨晚場波皇馬中間兩個中場加維臣同... [/quote]
同意,加維臣依家進攻少左,好似改左打法咁,琴晚第一個罰球把握唔到真係唔抵,可能真係有d傷,再加上近期碧咸數場賽事都贏唔到,狀態難免比較差,同埋中場冇左施丹少左人控住個波黎做攻勢,前面又冇一個正中鋒去射門.......:(
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-14 19:27:
同意,加維臣依家進攻少左,好似改左... [/quote]
歐聯西甲同英超唔同,加維臣之前踢愛華頓,依d球隊防中截到個波跟住大腳斬向前或兩邊已經叫做助攻,間唔中有死球斬入去佢上去湧又算參與進攻,但係歐聯西甲依d打組織嘅聯賽,佢仲要踢皇馬唔通又可以靠大腳斬入禁區,死衝難衝咩,所以佢咪少左進攻囉
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-14 07:35 PM:
歐聯西甲同英超唔同,加維臣之前踢愛... [/quote]
梗係唔係啦,佢上年都係控球上去進攻嫁,今年真係未見過佢上前場進攻,我都係覺得佢上年既打法好d= ="
[[i] Last edited by abc123aa on 2005-9-14 at 07:42 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-14 19:40:
梗係唔係啦,佢上年都係控球上去進攻... [/quote]
但係作用唔大呢,如果做左都冇乜用不如專心防守
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-14 07:44 PM:
但係作用唔大呢,如果做左都冇乜用不如專心防守 [/quote]
專心防守當然好啦,但係我覺得佢得閒上前場幫下手都ok既~
我真係覺得皇馬抵死
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2005-9-14 07:46 PM:
我真係覺得皇馬抵死 [/quote]
原因何在???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-14 07:49 PM:
原因何在??? [/quote]
隊波太亂
有排執
領隊未解決到問題,繼續等死
[quote]Originally posted by [i]night[/i] at 2005-9-14 07:52 PM:
隊波太亂
有排執
領隊未解決到問題,繼續等死 [/quote]
仲有4-5個位既人要換= ="要全部換晒d後生既球員先得.......= ="
我覺得可以巴迪斯達同加維臣打雙防中,施丹打左,碧咸打右,巴迪斯達可攻可守,最緊要仲係體力夠,防中必要條件,而且施丹過往打左都唔錯,因為佢必要時懂得殺入中間,又可平衡到左右兩邊,卡路士又唔洗上得太多,昨晚第三球就係輸左路
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-14 07:58 PM:
我覺得可以巴迪斯達同加維臣打雙防中,... [/quote]
非常同意你呢個陣既打法,但可惜盧森保高冇當過巴迪斯達係防守球員,一味叫佢攻,其實佢助攻助守都得嫁啦,唔明點解唔叫佢打埋防守果瓣= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-14 20:10:
非常同意你呢個陣既打法,但可惜盧森保高冇當過巴迪斯達係防守球員,一味叫佢攻,其實佢助攻助守都得嫁啦,唔明點解唔叫佢打埋防守果瓣= =" [/quote]
佢曉用人魯爾、加維臣、巴迪斯達就唔會咁la
根本上依家既情況下魯爾唔改打法好難有正選= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-14 19:52:
仲有4-5個位既人要換= ="要全部換晒d後生既球員先得.......= =" [/quote]
最慘後生果d又唔掂
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-9-14 09:05 PM:
最慘後生果d又唔掂 [/quote]
係囉= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-14 07:35 PM:
歐聯西甲同英超唔同,加維臣之前踢愛... [/quote]
我初初睇佢外形,都以為佢係粗之大葉既球員,但之後見佢比既直線質數唔比一般前腰差,
再之後....發覺佢控球能力和突破能力也不弱(之前黎亞洲,見佢右邊突破4名球員)
至於為何少了那麼多助攻,真係問佢先知:(
[[i] Last edited by 奇 on 2005-9-14 at 09:36 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]奇[/i] at 2005-9-14 21:34:
我初初睇佢外形,都以為佢係粗之大葉... [/quote]
皇馬有施丹費高果陣都搓唔入,何況加維臣,有人走靚位見到交入去唔難,能幫隊友製造空位再比靚波就好難,皇馬上腳時間太多,表面上就控制戰局,實際上就比時間對方回防堵塞空位,所以以加維臣嘅能力好難有靚助攻
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-14 21:29:
係囉= =" [/quote]
我覺得皇馬後備不夠
往往直路死火
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-9-14 09:53 PM:
我覺得皇馬後備不夠
往往直路死火 [/quote]
大哨施丹唔出得就冇得變= ="後備一d力量都冇= ="
講來講去，皇馬最弱就是後防中路，希古拿此終唔係中堅人才。