[quote]Originally posted by [i]sagaman[/i] at 2005-9-14 10:29 PM:
講來講去，皇馬最弱就是後防中路，希古拿此終唔係中堅人才。 [/quote]
所以期待活基治真正復出,如果連佢都唔掂既話就........= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-14 23:18:
所以期待活基治真正復出,如果連佢都唔掂既話就........= =" [/quote]
活基治真係唔係咁勁,照抨佢未必好過森美爾,而且皇馬唔係一個後衛唔掂,係一對中堅都唔掂
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-14 11:45 PM:
活基治真係唔係咁勁,照抨佢未必好過森美爾,而且皇馬唔係一個後衛唔掂,係一對中堅都唔掂 [/quote]
我未睇過活基治,所以唔知佢打成點,佢當然冇森美爾咁好,不過有森美爾都冇用啦,歐盟位置滿晒,依家咁樣睇羅賓奴已經係必然正選,其實唔明點解拉莫斯都踢到咁差= ="
碧咸扮跌令對手領黃牌個球，佢先係中場隨便的碰撞，就扮野打再個觔斗，再即在場邊又打多兩個觔斗，哈！我還以為睇緊京劇。
另多d大牌球員，做人場就梗縮，仲變成遮埋守門員啦視線！
咁多大牌都吾係打波，隊波又點會吾輪！
[quote]Originally posted by [i]金魚佬[/i] at 2005-9-15 12:17 AM:
碧咸扮跌令對手領黃牌個球，佢先係中... [/quote]
不嬲碧咸都係咁嫁啦,唔避既話傷硬,再加上比牌係球証既問題啫,球証咁都睇唔到碧咸避既話真係傻傻地= ="
球員有樣野叫' 決心 '。
而且身為防守中場竟然怕被人踢？咁其他球員，尤其進攻球員，點解又吾見不停打觔斗。咁既球員就真係無野好講！
[[i] Last edited by 金魚佬 on 2005-9-15 at 12:56 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-15 00:15:
我未睇過活基治,所以唔知佢打成點,... [/quote]
首先拉莫斯唔係真係咁好,經驗所得好中堅年齡多數係廿七八歲,因為中堅除左要有技術體能之外,經驗其實比技術更重要,好似泰利咁係極之少有
而且皇馬一對閘經常助攻,當對手反擊過來往往唔夠人手,所以好多弱隊後衛打得好但一過強隊就失準,因為弱隊比人圍攻,多數打密集,每人防守範圍其實唔多,但強隊往往兩三個人要防守半場,跑慢d多包唔切
[quote]Originally posted by [i]金魚佬[/i] at 2005-9-15 00:53:
球員有樣野叫' 決心 '。
而且身為防守中場竟然怕被人踢？咁其球員，尤其進攻球員，點解又吾見不停打觔斗。咁既球員就真係無野好講！ [/quote]
係人都怕被人踢啦,會痛架,不過唔等於要'詐',而碧咸真係好誇張,成個飛起
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-15 12:59 AM:
係人都怕被人踢啦,會痛架,不過唔等於要'詐',而碧咸真係好誇張,成個飛起 [/quote]
講真,我就唔覺得碧咸有詐既成份,球証比牌剷人既球員都係球証自己本身既問題啫~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]金魚佬[/i] at 2005-9-15 12:53 AM:
球員有樣野叫' 決心 '。
而且身為防... [/quote]
同決心有咩關係???唔通人地剷埋黎自己唔避等中招重傷出場???似乎防中係踢人多過比人踢喎下話
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-15 01:44:
講真,我就唔覺得碧咸有詐既成份,球証比牌剷人既球員都係球証自己本身既問題啫~ [/quote]
見仁見智啦,肥肥都覺得欣宜靚女架
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-15 12:55 AM:
首先拉莫斯唔係真係咁好,經驗所得好... [/quote]
真係買又唔係,唔買又唔係= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-15 01:47:
真係買又唔係,唔買又唔係= =" [/quote]
另一方面係冇人係後防指揮,以前有希亞路,可以對隊友作出提場
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-15 01:50 AM:
另一方面係冇人係後防指揮,以前有希亞路,可以對隊友作出提場 [/quote]
咁啫係有排都搞唔掂個後防啦= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-15 01:51:
咁啫係有排都搞唔掂個後防啦= =" [/quote]
一般黎講後防連門將平均年齡會係球隊三線中最大嘅,但皇馬就相反,過往老人防線成功見唔少,現今AC同早年嘅阿仙奴,但年輕防線就好少見成功
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-15 01:56 AM:
一般黎講後防連門將平均年齡會係球隊三線中最大嘅,但皇馬就相反,過往老人防線成功見唔少,現今AC同早年嘅阿仙奴,但年輕防線就好少見成功 [/quote]
但係依家皇馬既防線都幾老下,卡路士,沙加度同希古拿都過30= ="係卡斯拿斯同拉莫斯係後生仔,咁你認為係咩問題呢,除左冇人指揮後防之外~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-15 01:58:
但係依家皇馬既防線都幾老下,卡路士,沙加度同希古拿都過30= ="係卡斯拿斯同拉莫斯係後生仔,咁你認為係咩問題呢,除左冇人指揮後防之外~ [/quote]
一般後防會有一個有經驗嘅球員指揮,而且多數係中堅或門將,因為佢地位置上睇得最清楚,例如佈越位等,就要有默契地散出,皇馬一對閘經常上前助攻,根本做唔到指揮工作,而且中路防守係最緊要,兩閘失位中堅可補救,但中堅失位對方就可以直接埋門,希古拿年紀大但實際經驗唔算老,佢只不過係皇馬現今比較好嘅一個中堅,而且一對閘經常上前助攻加大左中堅壓力,皇馬只差一個好似佩奧爾咁嘅中堅,適當時可控制隊友情緒,後衛唔冷靜已經輸左一半
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-15 02:11 AM:
一般後防會有一個有經驗嘅球員指揮,... [/quote]
係呀,皇馬兩閘進攻密度高過其他球隊好多= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-15 02:17:
係呀,皇馬兩閘進攻密度高過其他球隊好多= =" [/quote]
佢兩個差不多係翼衛,但打翼衛又唔打3-5-2就注定防守力不足,歸根究底又係前面太多星,夾梗要出