娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

sonyguy 發表於 2005-9-19 02:58 AM

愛斯賓奴對皇馬

我睇左下半場...
果個球証真係好攪笑..
咁都得!!佢知唔知自己做緊乜架!!

另外..
覺得羅賓奴...古迪佢地上腳太多...
唔明點解全部罰球角球都係碧咸開晒..
雖然佢開既死球係有一定水準...
但左邊右邊都係...覺得太過倚賴...
另外...佢地前面太個細膩...
成日後抽呀...專登甩呀咁...交到射到就係靚波...
但大部份都係唔掂...
最後後面同中間都有人拎左個紅牌...
睇黎仲有排輸~~!!

ciger 發表於 2005-9-19 03:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2005-9-19 02:58:
我睇左下半場...
果個球証真係好攪笑... [/quote]
佢地同曼城有d似,都係攻勢較多,而且又中楣中柱之下輸波,不過曼城就有人可憐,皇馬就比人話抵死,後防問題仍然存在,但前面其實冇得講喇,朗拿度多次射門都中龍門,羅賓奴又中楣,組織唔到射門就話有野改善啫,但射極都唔入而又中龍都真係唔知可以點改善,唯有望腳風順d啦
ps.講講下人地巴塞都入波喇

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-19 03:11 AM

罰球遠既唔比碧咸開唔通比卡路士射咩= ="

bigfish 發表於 2005-9-19 03:23 AM

冇計, 皇馬俾球證針對, 上場又係咁
碧咸有時o係三十碼附近跌低又唔吹罰球, 否則佢有機會憑罰球開齋

sonyguy 發表於 2005-9-19 03:27 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-19 03:11 AM:
罰球遠既唔比碧咸開唔通比卡路士射咩= =" [/quote]

邊個開唔係問題...
我覺得多少少變化好d...
佢地咁既人腳...
搵人射又好...
乜都好啦...
遠既...開個短組織下都得架姐...
唔駛下下斬...
人地全村人都返晒禁區...
...
另外...其實覺得巴迪斯逹踼得好好...
但last 一腳攪到又要停賽...
慘~

sonyguy 發表於 2005-9-19 03:31 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-19 03:07 AM:

佢地同曼城有d似,都係攻勢較多,而且... [/quote]

我覺得羅賓奴上腳太耐...
佢又唔係向前推...剩係企左係到...
唔夠爽...

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-19 03:39 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2005-9-19 03:27 AM:


邊個開唔係問題...
我覺得多少少... [/quote]
皇馬已經係中間進攻,攻極都攻唔到入去,仲短傳= ="?應該斬埋去啦,魯爾,朗拿度,巴迪斯達都頂得既~

kewell2r 發表於 2005-9-19 03:39 AM

球證白痴, 無話可說
吹左雞都可以返轉頭得益計入波

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-19 03:39 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2005-9-19 03:31 AM:


我覺得羅賓奴上腳太耐...
佢又唔係向前推...剩係企左係到...
唔夠爽... [/quote]
有時有d空位佢又係度死扭= ="

ciger 發表於 2005-9-19 03:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-19 03:39:

皇馬已經係中間進攻,攻極都攻唔到入去,仲短傳= ="?應該斬埋去啦,魯爾,朗拿度,巴迪斯達都頂得既~ [/quote]
今場進攻原本ok,朗拿度都好多射門,不過腳風唔係咁順,羅賓奴一腳中楣組織靚但差d運,失波後就實搓唔入喇,人地都901咯,仲想小組

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-19 03:59 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-19 03:46 AM:

今場進攻原本ok,朗拿度都好多射門,不過腳風唔係咁順,羅賓奴一腳中楣組織靚但差d運,失波後就實搓唔入喇,人地都901咯,仲想小組 [/quote]
上半場大哨d射門入唔到真係唔抵,卡文尼果然勁,
講返正題,皇馬都唔識改變下打法,打死一種,咪好似當年羅馬咁囉,中間攻唔入仲唔轉打法,咪衛冕唔到囉,依家皇馬個陣又怪,又將各球員d好處收埋晒,又只係係中間進攻,又唔會利用下卡路士同碧咸d側擊,再係咁皇馬下年連歐聯都未必有得打,都係換教練算啦,後備又冇人用.......:mad:

ciger 發表於 2005-9-19 04:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-19 03:59:

上半場大哨d射門入唔到真係唔抵,卡... [/quote]
呢個問題其實都講過好多次,你睇下下半場朗拿度個頭搥你就知點解皇馬少用側擊,比佢頂都頂唔應個波,要側擊就要巴迪斯達打最前,但得一個有頭搥其實都冇乜優勢

abc123aa 發表於 2005-9-19 06:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-19 04:06 AM:

呢個問題其實都講過好多次,你睇下下... [/quote]
咁咪要多d練囉,皇馬唯一一個可以改變既打法只有兩翼側擊,既然中路突破唔得唯有咁樣做,如果練都唔練就想有成效既話真係冇話可說,再加上兩翼側擊雖然以頭鎚攻擊為主,但有時都會落到隻腳到,到時頭唔得咪腳囉,如果皇馬連呢樣都唔試下就放棄既話真係等降班啦:o

sonyguy 發表於 2005-9-19 09:24 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kewell2r[/i] at 2005-9-19 03:39 AM:
球證白痴, 無話可說
吹左雞都可以返轉頭得益計入波 [/quote]

比我係皇馬...一定上訴...
如果上訴唔得...以後...
所有球員就算聽到雞聲都唔會停...
例如果d越左位...球証吹左雞...
我係前鋒都係繼續射......

sonyguy 發表於 2005-9-19 09:29 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-19 03:39 AM:

皇馬已經係中間進攻,攻極都攻唔到入去,仲短傳= ="?應該斬埋去啦,魯爾,朗拿度,巴迪斯達都頂得既~ [/quote]

佢地d 頭上功夫...
巴迪斯逹我唔肯定...
魯爾同朗拿度...要走位攝位果d 頂就ok...
罰球幾十人係禁區企定定鬥頂就真係差d 啦...

wer 發表於 2005-9-19 10:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2005-9-19 09:24:


比我係皇馬...一定上訴...
如果上訴唔得...以後...
所有球員就算聽到雞聲都唔會停...
例如果d越左位...球証吹左雞...
我係前鋒都係繼續射...... [/quote]
上訴....浪費時間

abcde1918 發表於 2005-9-19 10:37 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2005-9-19 09:24 AM:


比我係皇馬...一定上訴...
如果上訴唔得...以後...
所有球員就算聽到雞聲都唔會停...
例如果d越左位...球証吹左雞...
我係前鋒都係繼續射...... [/quote]
上訴有鬼用

sonyguy 發表於 2005-9-19 10:48 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-9-19 10:11 AM:

上訴....浪費時間 [/quote]

我諗上訴...唔駛朗拿度呀..施丹果d排隊既...
就算係浪費..
都係皇馬d 職員或其他員工...
浪費佢地d時間...無乜所謂...

另外...好明顯係吹左雞...
就算對賽果無影響...
罰下個球証都好丫...

abcde1918 發表於 2005-9-19 12:09 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2005-9-19 10:48 AM:


我諗上訴...唔駛朗拿度呀..施丹果... [/quote]
你中意

sonyguy 發表於 2005-9-19 12:24 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abcde1918[/i] at 2005-9-19 12:09 PM:

你中意 [/quote]

哈..咁又唔關我事既~~!!

頁: [1] 2 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.