[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-30 12:28 AM:
咁當然啦,但係皇馬一定唔會加到4萬比佢= =" [/quote]
當年皇馬都唔肯加到三萬俾馬基里尼啦, 轉個頭車仔就以雙倍人工簽左佢, 仲越踢越有, 帶起埋林柏特, o個陣時馬基里尼被認為係皇馬o既最有價值球員, 連施丹同費高都係咁講, 點知皇馬竟然用馬基里尼o既五倍人工簽下碧咸, 用佢黎做返馬基里尼o既野, 呢個時侯d 人先發覺碧咸攔截次數只及馬基里尼三分一...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2005-10-1 06:31 PM:
當年皇馬都唔肯加到三萬俾馬基里尼... [/quote]
皇馬不嬲唔會比高人工老臣子:mad:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2005-10-1 06:31 PM:
當年皇馬都唔肯加到三萬俾馬基里尼... [/quote]
碧咸跟本就唔係馬基里尼果種球員...皇馬買人不嬲冇腦可言...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2005-10-1 06:31 PM:
當年皇馬都唔肯加到三萬俾馬基里尼... [/quote]
碧咸都唔係打防中,攔截次數梗係唔夠馬基里尼,你不如話馬基里尼助攻次數不及碧咸= ="
馬基里尼唔同卡斯拿斯,冇左一個防中易搵過一個穩定既門將