[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:01 AM:
如果計埋D已經退出國家隊但仲打緊聯... [/quote]
= =
不如數埋d退左休架啦...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:03:
唔係講我地呢一刻既球員能力咩？？我以為係tim:P [/quote]
咁馬甸尼修夫基算唔算一刻既球員吖?如果講歷史,李奧100名都不入啦
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:06:
= =
不如數埋d退左休架啦... [/quote]
哈哈~可能廿個已經計埋架啦。:D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:06:
= =
不如數埋d退左休架啦... [/quote]
但係馬甸尼,杜林嘅表現真係好過李奧喎,點解唔可以計
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:07:
咁馬甸尼修夫基算唔算一刻既球員吖?如果講歷史,李奧100名都不入啦 [/quote]
我果呢一刻既意思，係佢呢一刻既能力喎。。。。。。唔係仲打緊就係。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:07 AM:
咁馬甸尼修夫基算唔算一刻既球員吖?如果講歷史,李奧100名都不入啦 [/quote]
但呢一刻李奧比修夫基勁吧...
馬甸尼就好唔同類型啫
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:09:
但呢一刻李奧比修夫基勁吧...
馬甸尼就好唔同類型啫 [/quote]
馬甸尼都走晒下坡啦。。。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:08:
我果呢一刻既意思，係佢呢一刻既能力喎。。。。。。唔係仲打緊就係。 [/quote]
我覺得杜林,馬甸尼,修夫基這些老將呢一刻既表現好過李奧
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:10 AM:
我覺得杜林,馬甸尼,修夫基這些老將呢一刻既表現好過李奧 [/quote]
.......馬甸尼都ok,但修夫基汶水d掛....
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:09:
但呢一刻李奧比修夫基勁吧...
馬甸尼就好唔同類型啫 [/quote]
如果講穩陣,修夫基一定好過今季嘅李奧,上季佢都仲OK,但今季真係差左(講緊李奧)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:12 AM:
如果講穩陣,修夫基一定好過今季嘅李奧,上季佢都仲OK,但今季真係差左(講緊李奧) [/quote]
各人有各人觀點掛...:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:14:
各人有各人觀點掛...:) [/quote]
我都覺得係。每個人心目卜中都有定位，無得好爻。:D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:14:
各人有各人觀點掛...:) [/quote]
今季奧沙都好過李奧呀,人工高左連D波都高章埋,一個打高章波嘅後衛冇咁3成功力
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:15 AM:
我都覺得係。每個人心目卜中都有定位，無得好爻。:D [/quote]
同意
大佬 人黎架冇可能唔錯.....
我睇咁耐 我第一定見佢咁
勁果時都唔見讚...
十足民主黨
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Beckham4072[/i] at 2005-10-3 04:38 PM:
大佬 人黎架冇可能唔錯.....
我睇咁耐 我第一定見佢咁
勁果時都唔見讚...
十足民主黨 [/quote]
= ="
因為佢既十二萬鎊,
勁係應該的,
錯一次ok,
一場波錯兩次就.....
民主黨= =?????去錯板
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-10-3 04:52 PM:
= ="
因為佢既十二萬鎊,
勁係應該的,
錯一次ok,
一場波錯兩次就.....
民主黨= =?????去錯板 [/quote]
十二萬只係一個標籤姐
人就係人 人就會錯 錯唔會有數次限住架
唔通勁就要無限勁咩
你有睇場波 雲達沙倒戈後場比人勁開汽水
如果係布朗 3 4球都有得輸
[quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-10-3 04:52 PM:
= ="
因為佢既十二萬鎊,
勁係應該的,
錯一次ok,
一場波錯兩次就.....
民主黨= =?????去錯板 [/quote]
我覺得一次半次錯唔係問題,但係如果長期都唔小心,大意的話,就真係好唔掂lor
不過里奧我越黎越覺得只係得個名...當年3000萬鎊真係唔值,佢都仲未到頂級,唔夠穩陣
打後衛就好似打龍門咁
救到就英雄救唔到就罪人
邊個唔想守住唔失
當年杜滴黑 哦 旦 變罪人
囉歐冠做英雄.....
[quote]Originally posted by [i]skjeiw[/i] at 2005-10-3 05:02 PM:
我覺得一次半次錯唔係問題,但係如... [/quote]
有佢同冇佢係3回事
佢停賽冇左佢..mu好似有波必應咁