娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-2 10:42 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-2 04:54 PM:

唔選碧咸會暴動架,太多FANS喇,如果個選舉有贊助商仲敝,驚比人抵制 [/quote]
費sir賣走碧咸,又唔見曼聯入面果d碧咸fans鬧費sir???

CHECSS 發表於 2005-10-2 10:51 PM

有 ar
e.g. me and my brother

bigfish 發表於 2005-10-2 10:54 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-2 10:40 PM:

夠啦你,唔該講碧咸既事實講返d係事實既野啦,費事又比人插 [/quote]
可能我未 explain 大賽球員呢個 term
碧咸, 施丹同奧雲呢d 逢大賽都表現出色o既就係大賽球員
迪比亞路, 蘇拿同亨利呢d 少有表現o既就唔係, 佢地只會o係聯賽有表現

bigfish 發表於 2005-10-2 10:56 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-2 10:42 PM:

費sir賣走碧咸,又唔見曼聯入面果d碧咸fans鬧費sir??? [/quote]
因為佢地已經過檔去皇馬
你睇曼聯賣走佢之後一隻杯都冇就知啦, 碧咸離開曼聯絕對係曼聯o既損失

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-2 11:09 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2005-10-2 10:56 PM:

因為佢地已經過檔去皇馬
你睇曼聯賣走佢之後一隻杯都冇就知啦, 碧咸離開曼聯絕對係曼聯o既損失 [/quote]
同埋,碧咸去到皇馬都係一隻盃都冇,但曼聯都叫做攞過下足總盃..........

ciger 發表於 2005-10-2 11:27 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2005-10-2 22:54:

可能我未 explain 大賽球員呢個 ter... [/quote]
算吧啦,稱得上大賽球員就只有朗拿度,佢兩年唔出得一出就入8球兼攞世界杯,但返去打聯賽又唔見影,奧雲,碧咸果d世界杯,歐洲國家杯都未入過決賽嘅又點可以叫大賽球員,不如話李健和啦,佢對親外隊都有表現

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-2 11:49 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-2 11:27 PM:

算吧啦,稱得上大賽球員就只有朗拿度... [/quote]
同意~

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-3 12:22 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]CHECSS[/i] at 2005-10-2 22:51:
有 ar
e.g. me and my brother [/quote]
哈哈。:lol:乜咁激

ciger 發表於 2005-10-3 12:26 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-3 00:22:

哈哈。:lol:乜咁激 [/quote]
我都鬧費SIR啦,你要賣都唔好賣比皇馬吖,搞到皇馬咁

pkdonald 發表於 2005-10-3 12:29 AM

RE

布魯士呢?

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-3 12:29 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-3 00:26:

我都鬧費SIR啦,你要賣都唔好賣比皇馬吖,搞到皇馬咁 [/quote]
皇馬打得差,關碧咸咩事丫。要怪都怪皇馬班話事人。

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-3 12:55 AM

咪係,有時都要靠碧咸d罰球贏1-0,碧咸去皇馬之前,皇馬都係攞唔到冠軍.........

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-3 12:56 AM

開左考眼光(意甲)--- 國際米蘭@ 祖雲達斯
得個半鐘。大家要玩就快手啦。

ciger 發表於 2005-10-3 01:31 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-3 00:55:
咪係,有時都要靠碧咸d罰球贏1-0,碧咸去皇馬之前,皇馬都係攞唔到冠軍......... [/quote]
碧咸去皇馬之前皇馬正是應屆西甲冠軍

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-3 01:52 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:31 AM:

碧咸去皇馬之前皇馬正是應屆西甲冠軍 [/quote]
咁唔通又關碧咸事???

ciger 發表於 2005-10-3 02:04 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-3 01:52:

咁唔通又關碧咸事??? [/quote]
唔係關碧咸這個'人'事,但係關碧咸轉會這件事,碧咸轉會之前,皇馬有成績但蝕錢,但碧咸轉會後皇馬由於贊助同廣告收入多左,又開拓到亞洲市場,轉虧為盈,但亦因此改變買人方針,唔理啱唔啱用,總之有市場價值就買左先算,出現之後果D攻守唔平衡嘅怪陣,球員出席商業活動亦都多左,結果皇馬成為曼聯之後第二賺錢嘅球會,但就再冇羸得任何錦標
所以話碧咸轉會完全改變左皇馬嘅政策,就算將來碧咸退休,皇馬都可能繼續搵其他有商業價值嘅球員代替佢

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-3 03:32 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-3 02:04 AM:

唔係關碧咸這個'人'事,但係關碧咸轉... [/quote]
adidas都比多左錢皇馬啦應該......= ="

事但 發表於 2005-10-3 11:10 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-3 11:42 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]事但[/i] at 2005-10-3 11:10 AM:

皇馬"一年一球星""... [/quote]
係叫佩雷斯.....

ciger 發表於 2005-10-3 02:32 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]事但[/i] at 2005-10-3 11:10:

皇馬"一年一球星""... [/quote]
'一年一球星'並無不當,但'一年一不適用球星'就唔同,之前費高,施丹,朗拿度全部在球隊起到作用,但由碧咸開始,已經係可有可無,唔係話佢唔好波,但買左佢地之後對球隊冇好處(除左多了商業贊助同廣告),仲因此而放棄左一d有用但星味唔夠嘅球員,所以話'一年一球星'由碧咸開始已經變質

頁: 1 [2] 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.