娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

wai0818 發表於 2005-10-6 03:42 PM

J.cole 入 3:1 果球 , 好明顯係越位

當隊友傳球離腳一刻,接應的隊員前面少於2名對手(防守兩名球員不一定其中一名是守門員)
即offside...
好明顯 J.cole 執雞果陣前面得一個希比亞 .....
都唔明 d 評述重大大聲聲講希比亞包左越位 ....:(

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-6 03:49 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]wai0818[/i] at 2005-10-6 15:42:
當隊友傳球離腳一刻,接應的隊員前面少... [/quote]
咁龍門呢?

SPACE2007 發表於 2005-10-6 03:58 PM

你講的球例絕對正確, 而那時龍門的位置又真係後過J.Cole, 但我仲未有機會再睇場波, 到底仲有冇球員係J.Cole前面, 而且大家即時真係想唔起條球例, 只係見到希比亞係前面就當冇越位, 踢波就係有咁多人為因素, 冇辦法, 但咁樣先有趣

super168 發表於 2005-10-6 04:01 PM

球証擺明幫車仔
係咪有線d評述呀,佢地正一廢柴,同Peter Wong 一樣
好懷念何輝 同 江忠德

wai0818 發表於 2005-10-6 04:10 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]super168[/i] at 2005-10-6 16:01:
球証擺明幫車仔
係咪有線d評述呀,佢地正一廢柴,同Peter Wong 一樣
好懷念何輝 同 江忠德 [/quote]

我鐘意馬啟仁同丁偉杰 ... 唔知馬啟仁去左邊呢 ??

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-6 04:25 PM

呢條例有幾多人知都成問題啦.......
基本上係球場係唔會將呢球當成越位,雖然係有呢條例係度

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-6 04:26 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-6 03:49 PM:

咁龍門呢? [/quote]
龍門走左出去樸波,基本上好多球員都未必知呢條例,就算連球証都係

lolohang1171 發表於 2005-10-6 04:35 PM

不過紅軍今年既入球率都真係麻麻...

ahho319 發表於 2005-10-6 04:48 PM

keeper 係出左黎
但佢後面仲有兩個人...一個係希比亞
另一個係鏡頭下面(唔記得邊個囉 )....

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-6 04:53 PM

點都係要睇返段片先至知。有無人有?

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-6 05:18 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ahho319[/i] at 2005-10-6 04:48 PM:
keeper 係出左黎
但佢後面仲有兩個人...一個係希比亞
另一個係鏡頭下面(唔記得邊個囉 ).... [/quote]
我記得好似得一個希比亞= ="

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-6 05:22 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-6 17:18:

我記得好似得一個希比亞= =" [/quote]
咁者係真係越位啦喎:o

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-6 05:26 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-6 05:22 PM:

咁者係真係越位啦喎:o [/quote]
照返呢條例黎睇就係,但球証知唔知有呢條例先,利物浦教練同球員都冇投訴,可能真係人為因素影響啦,始終現場咁激好難即時記得

wai0818 發表於 2005-10-6 06:25 PM

評述錯都無咁大問題 , 問題係球証都出錯先係一個大問題 , 身為國際球証 , 果晚聽評述講 , 話佢重係代表英格蘭出任 06世界杯既其中一個球証添 =.="

咁死得啦 .......

bigfish 發表於 2005-10-6 06:56 PM

除左前面有希比亞, 鏡頭下方仲有另一位球員包左越位, 請細心睇下啦

bigfish 發表於 2005-10-6 06:58 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-6 04:26 PM:

龍門走左出去樸波,基本上好多球員都未必知呢條例,就算連球証都係 [/quote]
呢條例唔係咩特別球例, 你唔好當d 球證同球員廢先得架...
我小學o個陣都知呢條例啦, 老豆同我講o既

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-6 07:08 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]wai0818[/i] at 2005-10-6 06:25 PM:
評述錯都無咁大問題 , 問題係球証都出... [/quote]
呢d情況好多時都有嫁啦= ="
家下問題係究竟有冇第二位球員而佢係冇入到鏡呢= ="

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-6 07:08 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2005-10-6 06:58 PM:

呢條例唔係咩特別球例, 你唔好當d 球證同球員廢先得架...
我小學o個陣都知呢條例啦, 老豆同我講o既 [/quote]
咁如果真係冇第二位球員既話點解唔吹越位同唔投訴呢???
既然你老豆咁醒目知道既,點解d講波佬唔知既;)
睇黎d講波佬要讀下d球例

brightlee 發表於 2005-10-6 07:30 PM

I remember when I was watching this match in Sydney, they show THIS OFFISDE situation in replay, and some of the Liverpool players were complaining.. but not much.....
Well, that's why I like to watch English version in soccer (not Australian commentators, they were from BBC)
The commentators clearly said that's Offside........


but for referee point of view, it's normal he couldn't see that incident... remmeber he's running at the back of the players.. not on the same line as the players.....

[[i] Last edited by brightlee on 2005-10-6 at 09:33 PM [/i]]

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-6 07:31 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-6 19:08:

咁如果真係冇第二位球員既話點解唔吹越位同唔投訴呢???
既然你老豆咁醒目知道既,點解d講波佬唔知既;)
睇黎d講波佬要讀下d球例 [/quote]
可能講波佬呃飯食吧。:lol:

頁: [1] 2 3 4

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.