[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-6 07:31 PM:
可能講波佬呃飯食吧。:lol: [/quote]
係呀:D:lol:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2005-10-6 07:30 PM:
I remember when I was watching this... [/quote]
你係唔係話果度既講波佬話明顯係越位???
咁球証同利物浦班職球員都幾好野下.....:o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-6 07:08 PM:
咁如果真係冇第二位球員既話點解唔吹越位同唔投訴呢???
既然你老豆咁醒目知道既,點解d講波佬唔知既;)
睇黎d講波佬要讀下d球例 [/quote]
先多謝你讚家嚴, 佢解釋呢條例俾我係因為當時正進行 90 世界盃, 有個類似咁o既情況, 我記得當時d 講波佬都有講過 (唔知係咪陳譚)
呢d 係普通球例, 我意思係話知道條例都冇咩大不了, 而且所有球證一定會知 (因為有會員話呢個情況 - 龍門前過兩個後衛 - 比較少見, 連球證都未必知)
反而講波佬我覺得未必會知, 因為佢地真係冇讀過d 球例, 而且出錯o既機會都幾多, 千祈唔好當佢地係權威就得 la
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-6 19:31:
可能講波佬呃飯食吧。:lol: [/quote]
帶到氣氛就得
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2005-10-6 07:59 PM:
先多謝你讚家嚴, 佢解釋呢條例俾我係因為當時正進行 90 世界盃, 有個類似咁o既情況, 我記得當時d 講波佬都有講過 (唔知係咪陳譚)
呢d 係普通球例, 我意思係話知道條例都冇咩大不了, 而且所有球證一定會知 (因為有會員話呢個情況 - 龍門前過兩個後衛 - 比較少見, 連球證都未必知)
反而講波佬我覺得未必會知, 因為佢地真係冇讀過d 球例, 而且出錯o既機會都幾多, 千祈唔好當佢地係權威就得 la
[/quote]
唔洗客氣:D
我同意你講唔好當d講波佬係權威呢個論點
依家既情況係如果真係冇第二個球員係前過祖高爾既話,啫係越位啦,
[color=Red]因為希比亞既角色變左係龍門,同普通單刀越位既道理一樣,[/color]
我見有時呢d通常球証都唔吹越位,所以我唔知球証知唔知呢條例,但應該會知囉
可能真係比較少見同埋可能冇咩案例參考,其實呢球同謝列美入果球一樣,只不過係謝列美後上咁解:)
唔知紅字果度講得啱唔啱呢,唔啱既話指教下:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-10-6 08:01 PM:
帶到氣氛就得 [/quote]
基本上講解到場波就ok
如果場波係馬啟仁講既話佢可能知,因為之前亨利快開罰球佢都講到出黎係咩事
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-6 08:03 PM:
唔洗客氣:D
我同意你講唔好當d講波... [/quote]
其實我覺得呢球波真係冇越到位, 因為真係有兩個球員 (希比亞加埋另一個後衛)o係祖高爾前面 when 杜奧巴射門一刻
我都好肯定球證係百分之一百清楚呢條例o既運作, 睇唔睇到就靠對眼, 同對球例認知無關
係咪即係攻方射門時,如果前過對方兩個守衛時,就等於offside呀?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-6 19:31:
可能講波佬呃飯食吧。:lol: [/quote]
我要為班講波佬申冤,當晚有一個講波佬係有講過這個問題,我親耳聽到,至於球證唔吹有可能係佢認為當時另一個防守球員(唔係希比亞)同祖高爾平排,事實上真係好近,我地都要慢鏡先睇到,球證可能睇錯
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-10-6 10:16 PM:
係咪即係攻方射門時,如果前過對方兩個守衛時,就等於offside呀? [/quote]
非也, 係某球員傳球時, 接應o既隊友前面 or 平排o既守方球員少於兩名就構成越位
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-6 20:03:
唔洗客氣:D
我同意你講唔好當d講波... [/quote]
希比亞既角色變左係龍門,咁佢咪可以用手?唔應該咁講
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2005-10-6 10:24 PM:
非也, 係某球員傳球時, 接應o既隊友前面 or 平排o既守方球員少於兩名就構成越位 [/quote]
基本上我明,只係覺得有d complicated
學abc話..
如果將hyppia當keeper,會易理解好多
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-10-6 10:29 PM:
基本上我明,只係覺得有d complicated
學abc話..
如果將hyppia當keeper,會易理解好多 [/quote]
理解得到就好 la:D
即係有d 人會將 keeper 當"其中一名守衛"咁去理解一樣
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-6 16:25:
呢條例有幾多人知都成問題啦.......
基本上係球場係唔會將呢球當成越位,雖然係有呢條例係度 [/quote]
我睇左廿年波,都係見過一次咁嘅情況,90年世界杯季軍戰意大利對英格蘭,巴治奧就有1球波係咁,我唔係好記得,不過應該係有吹越位,當年tvb搵陳譚新上黎講波,我都係果陣先知咁都係越位
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-10-6 22:29:
基本上我明,只係覺得有d complicated
學abc話..
如果將hyppia當keeper,會易理解好多 [/quote]
其實好簡單,唔好將龍門當係龍門,當係普通球員就得,咁前面有2個對方球員咪冇越位囉
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2005-10-6 10:09 PM:
其實我覺得呢球波真係冇越到位, 因... [/quote]
祖高爾前面好似得一個利物浦球員,其他位有冇就唔知= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-6 10:26 PM:
希比亞既角色變左係龍門,咁佢咪可以用手?唔應該咁講 [/quote]
冇話佢變左係龍門,呢個只係理解球例既一個比喻:o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2005-10-6 10:24 PM:
非也, 係某球員傳球時, 接應o既隊友前面 or 平排o既守方球員少於兩名就構成越位 [/quote]
平排都當???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-6 10:32 PM:
我睇左廿年波,都係見過一次咁嘅情況... [/quote]
我之前都睇過有關既文章,但係都唔明,到依家先明:o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-6 22:56:
平排都當??? [/quote]
平排一定當啦