娛樂滿紛 26FUN » Sports討論版 » 世界最佳陣容討論

pc20001103b 發表於 2005-10-8 11:19 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-8 18:51:

兩個都咁勁,但係卡斯拿斯反應比較好 [/quote]
仲未有機會俾卡斯拿斯係一級後防度打,真係唔知邊個勁d,
有d波係後防差,個龍門勁,但去左d後防好既球隊後,注意力唔可以短時間內集中(同以前比)
所以卡斯拿斯究竟只係個"弱隊鋼門"(後防弱,唔係隊波弱)
定係真既鋼門就真係唔知

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-8 11:39 PM

之前皇馬條後防冇咁差果時佢都係咁勁~

kiki12345 發表於 2005-10-9 01:30 AM

如果舒米高仲係年輕既話~
你地又會唔會放佢係入面呢~

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-9 02:01 AM

一定會~

ciger 發表於 2005-10-9 02:10 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]pc20001103b[/i] at 2005-10-8 23:19:

仲未有機會俾卡斯拿斯係一級後防度... [/quote]
次級後防都打得好,真係搵唔到理由一級後防會打得唔好,一級後防同次級後防都係咁打,只不過一級後防撲救次數少d甚至唔駛撲救

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-9 02:18 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kiki12345[/i] at 2005-10-9 01:30:
如果舒米高仲係年輕既話~
你地又會唔會放佢係入面呢~ [/quote]
我一定會。

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-9 02:19 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-9 02:10:

次級後防都打得好,真係搵唔到理由一級後防會打得唔好,一級後防同次級後防都係咁打,只不過一級後防撲救次數少d甚至唔駛撲救 [/quote]
所以睇落去好似勁D咁。:P

pc20001103b 發表於 2005-10-9 10:20 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-9 02:10:

次級後防都打得好,真係搵唔到理由一級後防會打得唔好,一級後防同次級後防都係咁打,只不過一級後防撲救次數少d甚至唔駛撲救 [/quote]
大把龍門撲到識飛咁啦
都唔定係大球會(後防好)有好發展
就因為會唔慣成日唔駛撲,突然要你撲一球,注意力好易分散

kakeidevil 發表於 2005-10-9 10:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-9 02:10 AM:

次級後防都打得好,真係搵唔到理由一級後防會打得唔好,一級後防同次級後防都係咁打,只不過一級後防撲救次數少d甚至唔駛撲救 [/quote]


車仔既施治就係咁

kakeidevil 發表於 2005-10-9 10:22 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]pc20001103b[/i] at 2005-10-9 10:20 AM:

大把龍門撲到識飛咁啦
都唔定係大球會(後防好)有好發展
就因為會唔慣成日唔駛撲,突然要你撲一球,注意力好易分散 [/quote]



紫百合既費爾

ciger 發表於 2005-10-9 02:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]pc20001103b[/i] at 2005-10-9 10:20:

大把龍門撲到識飛咁啦
都唔定係大球會(後防好)有好發展
就因為會唔慣成日唔駛撲,突然要你撲一球,注意力好易分散 [/quote]
通常這種球員(會注意力好易分散)在細球會都唔係場場打得好,好似占士,有時撲到識飛咁,有時又發波瘟,如果場場都有好表現嘅就一定冇問題

pc20001103b 發表於 2005-10-9 04:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-10-9 10:21:



車仔既施治就係咁 [/quote]
施治好耐先撲一球,但水準仍然好高

查看完整版本: 世界最佳陣容討論