娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

kakeidevil 發表於 2005-10-9 08:59 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-9 08:56 PM:

多數球員都會咁架啦。明知搏到碧咸就出得場。:o [/quote]



碧咸有冇話上訴?

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-9 09:00 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-10-9 20:59:




碧咸有冇話上訴? [/quote]
好似話會。

kakeidevil 發表於 2005-10-9 09:02 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-9 09:00 PM:

好似話會。 [/quote]



咁多好d,希望b23打得甩

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-9 09:03 PM

原來碧咸咁樣就創左個不光彩紀錄。就係首位世界盃被逐兩次球員=.="

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-9 09:04 PM

好似話唔會上訴

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-9 09:05 PM

FA will not make Beckham appeal

唔會上訴...=.="
[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/[/url] ... tionals/4324060.stm

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-9 09:06 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-9 21:03:
原來碧咸咁樣就創左個不光彩紀錄。就係首位世界盃被逐兩次球員=.=" [/quote]
更正。唔止世界盃。仲要係所有國際賽首位英球員。

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-9 09:07 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-9 21:05:
FA will not make Beckham appeal

唔會上訴...=.="
[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/[/url] ... tionals/4324060.stm [/quote]
哈。我都係有D記憶。不過原來記錯。

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-9 09:12 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-9 09:06 PM:

更正。唔止世界盃。仲要係所有國際賽首位英球員。 [/quote]
唔緊要,比球証咁樣判法,想光彩都唔得啦........最緊要打到好成績

kakeidevil 發表於 2005-10-9 09:14 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-9 09:05 PM:
FA will not make Beckham appeal

唔會上訴...=.="
[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/[/url] ... tionals/4324060.stm [/quote]



thx

金魚佬 發表於 2005-10-9 09:48 PM

版主條片,無正面由底線影出來既。第一腳左腳無野發生。第第二步碧咸右腳有無掂到人,要從其它角度先知。我指係第二下有無接觸!因為連碧咸自已都係吾自然改變方向跌落地。

不過如果換亞仙奴既雷耶斯。肯定佢會反過來,將自已隻腳伸向對方,故向做成接觸而跌低。

[[i] Last edited by 金魚佬 on 2005-10-9 at 09:49 PM [/i]]

nkt1000 發表於 2005-10-9 10:39 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]我‧愛‧你[/i] at 2005-10-9 02:50 PM:

無意中帶協你加分:D [/quote]
多謝我‧愛‧你兄!!!

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-9 10:43 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nkt1000[/i] at 2005-10-9 22:39:

多謝我‧愛‧你兄!!! [/quote]
哈哈。:D

srfqt1 發表於 2005-10-9 10:54 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2005-10-9 01:07 AM:
Well, next tame, don't let Rooney to play ...
Peter Counch should start..... [/quote]

啱既
Peter Counch啱晒艾歷臣用
因為英格蘭最近經常踢得唔好
艾歷臣又冇辦法改善
咁而家用佢亂放高波就ok
橫掂英格蘭玩組織都唔掂
咁就唔好浪費rooney呢d好球員
等佢多d休息,可以集中精神踢曼聯既比賽:lol:

金魚佬 發表於 2005-10-9 11:14 PM

以前英格蘭個家波係雙翼齊飛。落係線傳中,所以英國球員低線斬波,一向都好好基本功夫。
利記個時最威水個幾年,班尼斯都係正中左翼。魯殊做射手。

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-9 11:21 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]金魚佬[/i] at 2005-10-9 23:14:
以前英格蘭個家波係雙翼齊飛。落係線... [/quote]
yup~原本英格蘭都係咁樣打開。果時效果都唔錯。其實真係可以試下行返條舊路。不過最輸英格蘭前線依家少梗D大件頭既球員。得個單薄得緊要既高治!

金魚佬 發表於 2005-10-9 11:48 PM

以前魯殊都係5'8"。係底線傳中,做後衛又要望底線,又要轉頭睇前鋒走位?有混亂就有機會入波。魯殊,連尼加都係個一類。

abc123aa 發表於 2005-10-10 12:20 AM

可惜英格蘭冇左翼.......= ="

sonyguy 發表於 2005-10-10 09:32 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-10 12:20 AM:
可惜英格蘭冇左翼.......= =" [/quote]

我成日都諗...點解唔將艾殊利高爾打前一格做左翼...佢地左閘都仲有人...
但左翼真係無~

kakeidevil 發表於 2005-10-10 10:01 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2005-10-10 09:32 AM:


我成日都諗...點解唔將艾殊利高爾打前一格做左翼...佢地左閘都仲有人...
但左翼真係無~ [/quote]


布歷治,李察遜,唐寧

頁: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.