就算真係俾碧咸打甩..
佢好似本身張黃牌都要令佢下場停賽=.=
[quote]Originally posted by [i]LMQ[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:40 AM:
就算真係俾碧咸打甩..
佢好似本身張黃牌都要令佢下場停賽=.= [/quote]
咁就大鑊!!!!:(
[quote]Originally posted by [i]LMQ[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:40 AM:
就算真係俾碧咸打甩..
佢好似本身張黃牌都要令佢下場停賽=.= [/quote]
唔係呀嘛
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nkt1000[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:41 AM:
咁就大鑊!!!!:( [/quote]
如果係即紅都仲有得講下...=.=
最衰佢之前投訴...兩黃一紅..死得..
大家佔下下場邊個做隊長
[quote]Originally posted by [i]LMQ[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:42 AM:
如果係即紅都仲有得講下...=.=
最衰佢之前投訴...兩黃一紅..死得.. [/quote]
好似啫,要check下先知
[quote]Originally posted by [i]underrock[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:44 AM:
大家佔下下場邊個做隊長 [/quote]
奧雲
[quote]Originally posted by [i]LMQ[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:42 AM:
如果係即紅都仲有得講下...=.=
最衰佢之前投訴...兩黃一紅..死得.. [/quote]
咁就死火!!!:(
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:44 AM:
奧雲 [/quote]
同意,之前都試過冇碧咸是奧雲做隊長
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:44 AM:
好似啫,要check下先知 [/quote]
不過講真..
第一張根本冇乜可能罰到比牌..
第二張掂都冇掂就比牌
上訴至少可以取消一張:mad:
佢咩事紅ar
林柏差d2-0!!!
完場1-0!!!一額汗
[quote]Originally posted by [i]LMQ[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:46 AM:
不過講真..
第一張根本冇乜可能罰到比牌..
第二張掂都冇掂就比牌
上訴至少可以取消一張:mad: [/quote]
第一張比都仲可以呀,因為投訴,但係第二張就一定唔得囉........一定要上訴:mad:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lookityourself[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:49 AM:
佢咩事紅ar [/quote]
之前投訴攞黃牌,一分鐘都冇之後就兩黃一紅,果條友明明插水但球証話碧咸踢跌佢
轉自abc123aa的!!!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lookityourself[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:49 AM:
佢咩事紅ar [/quote]
比球証話佢踢人兩黃一紅,但果條友明明係插水,碧咸一早收晒腳......:mad:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:53 AM:
比球証話佢踢人兩黃一紅,但果條友明明係插水,碧咸一早收晒腳......:mad: [/quote]
唔抵...
都唔知個球証用咩野黎睇野
呢場波,謝拉特同林柏特分工好左,謝拉特踢後d
[quote]Originally posted by [i]tkk2p[/i] at 2005-10-9 12:54 AM:
呢場波,謝拉特同林柏特分工好左,謝拉特踢後d [/quote]
4-4-2始終係好d~