討論一下捷克隊ge施治好ma??
係車仔佢8場失2球..係捷克佢一場失2球,
睇黎車仔條防線真係幫佢好多~
我唔係話佢唔好,
但係並未可以同保方同卡c拿c比~
唔知大家有咩意見呢~~^^:D ..佢好勁-__-" 如果冇車仔條防線,我諗d數據冇咁勁 一場失2球唔代表佢屎波。不過8場失2球一定係車仔成隊波幫左佢。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-10 08:46 PM:
一場失2球唔代表佢屎波。不過8場失2球一定係車仔成隊波幫左佢。 [/quote]
冇錯 [quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-10 20:46:
一場失2球唔代表佢屎波。不過8場失2球一定係車仔成隊波幫左佢。 [/quote]
同意 [quote]Originally posted by [i]wer[/i] at 2005-10-10 09:00 PM:
同意 [/quote]
同意,c 治係有實力,不過唔係頂級! [quote]Originally posted by [i]cwc_tkd[/i] at 2005-10-10 20:39:
係車仔佢8場失2球..
係捷克佢一場失2球,
睇黎車仔條防線真係幫佢好多~
我唔係話佢唔好,
但係並未可以同保方同卡c拿c比~
唔知大家有咩意見呢~~^^:D [/quote]
一隊波失波多少唔可以直接反影到龍門嘅實力,我覺得施治絕對可以同保方卡斯拿斯比,因為佢冇乜失一D唔應該失嘅波,而且遠射要入施治真係唔容易,卡斯拿斯迎接高波唔及施治同保方,至於反應方面其實三位都不相伯仲 I think cech is not a worldclass,
Van der sar is better than him...
but cech is more young. [quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-10-10 21:16:
一隊波失波多少唔可以直接反影到龍... [/quote]
始終卡斯拿斯高度唔太夠啦。:D [quote]Originally posted by [i]adamjacky123[/i] at 2005-10-10 09:19 PM:
I think cech is not a worldclass,
Van der sar is better than him...
but cech is more young. [/quote]
兩個都唔差..
要比vds咪贏經驗law 係好..不過唔係最好,最top. [quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-10-10 09:28 PM:
始終卡斯拿斯高度唔太夠啦。:D [/quote]
龍門黎講高度算ok啦,184cm~:) [quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-10 21:49:
龍門黎講高度算ok啦,184cm~:) [/quote]
比起其他大球會龍門黎講真係差d啦。 好彩反應夠勁,又夠敏捷 [quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-10-10 23:21:
好彩反應夠勁,又夠敏捷 [/quote]
係呀。可以彌補返身型上既劣勢。 係呀 [quote]Originally posted by [i]cwc_tkd[/i] at 2005-10-10 08:39 PM:
係車仔佢8場失2球..
係捷克佢一場失2球,
睇黎車仔條防線真係幫佢好多~
我唔係話佢唔好,
但係並未可以同保方同卡c拿c比~
唔知大家有咩意見呢~~^^:D [/quote]
唔認同, 施治接波好穩陣, 好多波都可以接實, 好少甩手, 接唔到都可以推出底線, 不過佢同保方就比就差少少
至於卡斯拿斯, 好明顯低過佢地成班波, 你將佢同上述兩位比未免太抬舉佢 la 吓....現時世界級門將呢三位都有份喎,你竟然話太抬舉卡斯拿斯.........:o 大佬ar
點可以令捷克既防線同車路士既防線比ga