娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

SEEK 發表於 2005-10-14 01:16 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

herothree 發表於 2005-10-14 01:55 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-10-13 12:16 PM:bi!@ MQm9c9D
[b][size=5][color=Blue]Sports討論版算唔算係最旺?[/color][/size][/b] [/quote]
YoY-Sv*d 2CZ3EDR.{
hahaSw}e9Fx#|
i guess so, sport is pretty active
'{6D a0pA:B*m lV iu+pUV)^3IT9n
i remember when bright and i first join sportco)a;ph8cR/N(xY
no one speaks at sports as wellohD.M c5N#CS
then later we got honoured into 名人堂 (later, bro bright became 版主)
8\^1q8q5m#f&R!r all the sudden everyone's in for sports
*VM/GM3\ \TRD "_ } lB X$i4f
but later on those pts betting game and my injury drove mei away from EF
@w }K;y7t6l /}q[)O^f0{.d
now we're back tho
*r+s;eo W it is pretty bored sometimes
Fq*`0A y'o@ i can only speak for sports, coz that's where i mainly spend time at
k3q$c@'_#C+} E{3|8F sport is mainly soccer
2g:h iY(s| there's no room for other sports
kI'{6L_,_~)`Q;XH i post sth...but b4 anyone could see it...it's pushed down all the way to the 2nd page
1I'_H!fVN it's tough
L;MSy2o#K~m5Yo but i'll still try to bring more than just basketball and soccer here

jublio 發表於 2005-10-14 02:12 AM

05 年前注冊你就知 e 度以前好輪多野睇
%UCy sW0dp:H3uE /X0n"T+pK uV

HoRwb5LKs5| 而家言論受打壓, 又要分,真係幾 sh it

jameshohk 發表於 2005-10-14 03:02 AM

咁應該點改革?

ALWIN_WONG 發表於 2005-10-14 06:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]gundamman678[/i] at 2005-10-14 12:33 AM: WkM HY I4X!|4j
原來都有人有同感覺......'\6Fg^DV
我都少參與左啦......
#h^_]#HT 一來很忙,二來上來頗悶.......5z[aHnf
我最鍾意留連既"戀愛區",版主都放手由得它荒廢啦~~ [/quote]0B|2gj/aVJc

:\+bhT&@cS:H T E5B }2W H)b|
好 似 不 止 單 單 "戀愛區" 以 經 荒 廢, Ryy(Vg)C
如 果 你 地 有 留 意 既 話 會 發 現 好 多 區
-N2O.ir-K { 既 版 主 都 開 始 進 入 “ 冬 眠 ” 既 狀 態 ...

甘國武 發表於 2005-10-14 06:27 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

kakeidevil 發表於 2005-10-14 08:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]甘國武[/i] at 2005-10-14 06:27 AM:
d!RB Am }J S5pi
睇我由極度敢言,變成e+成隻狗咁,就知啦! [/quote]
'pyF(}ZBYb o E"vn[OF9j0T
:DX0mmg.y%GsX:H9Z
:D:D

亨九利 發表於 2005-10-14 10:56 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:01 PM

點解冇版主入黎回應吓!!

d228216 發表於 2005-10-14 01:06 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]garycheung[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:01 PM:Q|;[WfZ;m{
點解冇版主入黎回應吓!! [/quote]6y#hu3C0}z
有邊段有需要回應呢?

garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:14 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]d228216[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:06 PM:o/Z;S5qvC&te;f0VFY l
:TcEC;|O
有邊段有需要回應呢? [/quote]Vv S2k/HI
對現時EF的睇法.

d228216 發表於 2005-10-14 01:21 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]garycheung[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:14 PM:
#oR!?~/md 6kyM,g1h
對現時EF的睇法. [/quote]xfFxiABZ.S,O6d
版主想知會員有咩睇法.

garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:57 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]d228216[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:21 PM:
(xCqEa `:Lf8Y8Y
H3P"xi`5@7Xk)V,Zu 版主想知會員有咩睇法. [/quote]
Xt3ym3^ b:?pif 我覺得EF而家好商業化,搞個《頻寬-用者自付計劃》但都知綱主經營ga難處...
S*Z%q#Ga b 可能係咁ga原因,有d會員不停出post為左攞分睇相,但忽略左post的質量.:o:o

lettwan 發表於 2005-10-14 02:26 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-10-13 09:48 PM:
_ofmlgKN [b][size=5][color=Blue]板規太多![/color][/size][/b] [/quote]
g v)RB!s#f%Y? 唔準打粗口係死因之一:mad:

austin666 發表於 2005-10-14 03:14 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-14 03:17 PM

其實我覺得有關方面真係要林林計解決問題。的確26FUN人流少左,分享又少左。

austin666 發表於 2005-10-14 03:30 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jublio 發表於 2005-10-14 04:32 PM

以前26fun 根本就係一個好麻甩既咸網,
)qI c#?6d:Ks(E^ 現在要轉型,
2X8b\'^Ds0\:PB;kB
)|(s2{!HH+hu@U 所以就係要強制一班麻甩佬著西裝,唔去雞竇去大會堂,咁你話悶唔悶

甘國武 發表於 2005-10-14 06:15 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

nkt1000 發表於 2005-10-14 06:51 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]austin666[/i] at 2005-10-14 03:30 PM:}~#\d+lO5b`.O F
X!x_Z}&X G

WW~aR
B do"QMLu 我都同意 b%D|4yB)Ccj
衣家俾人的感覺係貼... [/quote]
jn%ee,kN;l 同意!!!

頁: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.