娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

ckyckk 發表於 2005-12-29 11:04 PM

本人已將所有意願暫交與清揚,他將代表本人發言:cool:
     [size=6]Godson字[/size]

fantesticming05 發表於 2005-12-29 11:05 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-12-29 11:04 PM:

支持埋2 bosh也不一定是你的,haha~
2是案玩家排名及球員排名來分排的,但呢兩個rank是week week不同的,換句話即是2仲難中過1~
即買波與買六合彩之別:cool: [/quote]

哈哈, 是但啦 ~
我覺得2點都唔會過到~

清揚 發表於 2005-12-29 11:06 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ckyckk[/i] at 2005-12-29 23:04:
本人已將所有意願暫交與清揚,他將代表本人發言:cool: [/quote]
我會依照你主意代你作決定的~放心~

清揚 發表於 2005-12-29 11:07 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-29 23:05:


哈哈, 是但啦 ~
[color=Red]我覺得2點都唔會過到[/color]~ [/quote]
why?

fantesticming05 發表於 2005-12-29 11:18 PM

點解 shup up 唔見左既 ??

清揚 發表於 2005-12-29 11:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-29 23:18:
點解 shup up 唔見左既 ?? [/quote]
唔知:o

Xtravagant 發表於 2005-12-30 12:54 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-12-29 08:26 PM:

方案 一=自己選擇(你排第一的,kg必是你)
[color=Red]方案二=由秋兄編排[/color]
請支持方案 一:) [/quote]


oh I mistakenly understood him... I would now change and choose : "方案 一=自己選擇"

I would like to choose the player myself ....

清揚 發表於 2005-12-30 10:34 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-12-30 00:54:



oh I mistakenly understood him... I would now change and choose : "方案 一=自己選擇"

I would like to choose the player myself .... [/quote]
現在只待秋兄表態~

秋葉林 發表於 2005-12-30 10:39 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-12-29 20:26:

方案 一=自己選擇
方案二=由秋兄編排
請支持方案 一:) [/quote]

方案一唔係話由我編排,而係按照球員表現嚟編排﹙即係由個天嚟決定﹚,亦係目前所見最客觀嘅方法,無話偏幫榜首定榜尾嘅球隊。

你哋可以各自陳述各個方案嘅好處同壞處,但係請唔好為求自己嘅方案獲得通過而曲解人哋嘅方案。

仲有就係,唔好淨係話自己選擇定係邊個選擇,整個方案要落實執行仲有好多其他嘢要考慮,如果最終無人提出建議,我會响 1 月 1 日個方案度自行補充

秋葉林 發表於 2005-12-30 10:46 AM

雖然同意方案嘅人背後會有唔同原因,但係身為 admin 嘅我之所以會提出取締 Z-ZONE,除咗係回應民意外,最重要係要清除 inactive player 令個 league 更加活躍,而唔係要打救榜尾球隊幫佢哋去 fight 低榜首球隊。

自己打得差就自然排响榜尾,就算係幫都應該有個限度﹙政府援助窮人都唔會就咁派錢俾佢哋啦﹚,弱隊可望得到有力球員加盟已經係最大嘅援助,再幫多啲隨時會破壞咗個 league 嘅平衡,尤其係個 league 除咗首兩名同最尾果個,其餘球隊都只係相差幾場,如果個方案訂得唔好隨時會拉開佢哋嘅差距,直接影響季後賽出線嘅機會 ……

我想表達啲乜嘢信息,你哋自己諗下喇

清揚 發表於 2005-12-30 11:05 AM

我提議由各玩家按照自己既排名去選擇(由低至高),到時仍未出到用邊個人換邊個番黎既人就將佢果team最低rank果個換z-Zone當時最高rank果個(好似選秀時那樣)或 當佢放棄換人權利~

清揚 發表於 2005-12-30 11:12 AM

Z-zone之處理問題:
最好系Delete左佢,但我知應該不行架喇(如果得相信秋兄唔洗諗咁多野),既然唔可以Delete左Z-Zone,那只好將一些後備球員換進他隊中,保留他勝出的一線生機之餘又不會給"植物人"霸住D人唔用~

Xtravagant 發表於 2005-12-30 11:14 AM

[quote]方案一唔係話由我編排,而係按照球員表現嚟編排﹙[color=Red]即係由個天嚟決定[/color]﹚,亦係目前所見最客觀嘅方法,無話偏幫榜首定榜尾嘅球隊。[/quote]

我之前個DRAFT已經有一半人系由個天去定了:(﹐所以呢次就算吾系拿到好前既選擇權﹐我都情願憑自己既眼光去簡人。

FOR EXAMPLE ﹐就算最尾剩翻 BROWN﹐TINSLEY﹐ GOODEN 我都情願自己從中挑選一個出來而吾系由方案二既方法。

我自己投贊成既一票系因為吾想個LEAGUE有好多有實力既PLAYER INACTIVE。我覺得個游戲竟然給版主你可以放走其他人既球員﹐就係要來減少PLAYERS INACTIVE 。

清揚 發表於 2005-12-30 11:19 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2005-12-30 10:39:


方案一唔係話由我編排,而係按照... [/quote]
聽天由命呢層我都有諗過,但每次諗到J. Dixon突然大發神威個rank暴升我就怕怕..............
信唔信佢好呢???得唔得架佢???要唔要好呢???之類的多個問号便浮現出來:o

清揚 發表於 2005-12-30 11:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-12-30 11:14:


我之前個DRAFT已經有一半人系由個... [/quote]
作為一Le之主是有義務去另競爭更激烈的:)

秋葉林 發表於 2005-12-30 12:07 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-12-30 11:21:

作為一Le之主是有義務去另競爭更激烈的:) [/quote]

呢一點我有少少唔同意 ;)

作為版主,我認為應該盡量平均各方嘅利益,令個 league 更加公正、公平同公開,加強個 league 嘅競爭性只係其次,唔可以本末倒置

咁多好球員被凍結,就係對其他 team manager 唔公平,所以要將佢哋釋放。但係唔應該為咗增加個 league 嘅刺激性而太過偏幫弱旅,咁樣會對果啲一開始就用心經營隊波嘅 team manager 唔公平。

清揚 發表於 2005-12-30 12:13 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2005-12-30 12:07:


呢一點我有少少唔同意 ;)

作為... [/quote]
你唔系諗住我地D勁旅簡完先到D弱旅簡下化???
作為三甲既我都放得低同佢地去競爭,你同艾力克卻畏首畏尾,怕輸,好失望~

秋葉林 發表於 2005-12-30 12:21 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-12-30 12:13:

你唔系諗住我地D勁旅簡完先到D弱旅簡下化???
作為三甲既我都放得低同佢地去競爭,你同艾力克卻畏首畏尾,怕輸,好失望~ [/quote]

你係唔係痴線嫁,我幾時話由 shut up 同我揀人先呀,我提果個方案都係由榜尾揀人先嫁啦

咁你都可以理解錯,我都一樣好失望 :mad:

清揚 發表於 2005-12-30 12:24 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2005-12-30 12:21:


你係唔係痴線嫁,我幾時話由 shut up 同我揀人先呀,我提果個方案都係由榜尾揀人先嫁啦

咁你都可以理解錯,我都一樣好失望 :mad: [/quote]
你而家想點先???哥哥~

秋葉林 發表於 2005-12-30 12:28 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-12-30 12:24:

你而家想點先???哥哥~ [/quote]

1 月 1 日你咪知囉,細佬 ~

頁: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.