[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-30 16:25:
你有冇send過email俾我架?
coz 我收唔倒 :o [/quote]
冇:cool:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-30 16:12:
好似得你認識佢..........佢時時都有黎........但唔留言~ [/quote]
強制執行呢一點我有保留，咁樣即係迫人參加你個 party 啫，又或者有啲人真係唔得閒上嚟，錯過咗換人嘅機會已經好慘，仲要無啦啦俾人drop 咗自己個球員 ......
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-12-30 04:22 PM:
仍然是6:2:cool:
老實講,以我地既... [/quote]
可以唔要o既姐~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-30 16:16:
我支持方案二
多d變數刺激d
不過你地當然會支持方案一啦,自己想要邊個都得
到時淨番o個幾個,我都未必會要 :( [/quote]
同意，呢個方案仲可 trade 換人權添，不過大家無興趣，無計
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-30 16:29:
可以唔要o既姐~ [/quote]
sorry，如果強制換人成立嘅話無得唔要
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2005-12-30 16:27:
強制執行呢一點我有保留，咁樣即... [/quote]
咁當佢地放棄權利la(並不代表Dagame,godson.因為佢地已比左指示我點做)
Dagame:掉K. Martin 換1.S. Abdur-Rahim 2.J. Howard
Gododn:掉J. Childress 換1.C. Bosh 2.P. J.Brown 3.Ku. Thomas
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2005-12-30 16:32:
同意，呢個方案仲可 trade 換人權添，不過大家無興趣，無計 [/quote]
太冒險了,若到時的對象叫Dixon你會點先???;)
一陣再傾~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2005-12-30 04:33 PM:
sorry，如果強制換人成立嘅話無得唔要 [/quote]
哈哈... 咁都得? :D
聽天由命啦 :)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-30 04:36 PM:
哈哈... 咁都得? :D
聽天由命啦 :) [/quote]
講得岩....
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-30 16:36:
哈哈... 咁都得? :D
聽天由命啦 :) [/quote]
強制換人呢個方案太霸道喇，等於剝奪埋其他 manager 唔參加嘅自由，我諗我會運用版主嘅權力略為修訂呢個建議先至提出 …… 例如唔出聲嘅當棄權，出過聲嘅先強制換人，具體係點我要諗諗
即系點ar?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2005-12-30 17:07:
強制換人呢個方案太霸道喇，等於... [/quote]
而家只有terryjog未表態堵,佢唔出沒咪當佢放棄權利 low
另外聽天由命(2)太過弱智喇真系,到時真系Dixon咁點先?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-12-30 05:12 PM:
另外聽天由命(2)太過弱智喇真系,到時真系Dixon咁點先? [/quote]
dixon 咪 dixon 囉
講真,如果真係換o既,兩個方案對我黎講都冇太大影響,因為淨番o個d都幫唔倒我d乜
所以到時我反而會留意下你地會放邊個 ;)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-30 17:18:
dixon 咪 dixon 囉
講真,如果真係換o既,兩個方案對我黎講都冇太大影響,因為淨番o個d都幫唔倒我d乜
所以到時我反而會留意下你地會放邊個 ;) [/quote]
dixon / S. Abdur-Rahim 我棄權:cool:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-30 17:18:
dixon 咪 dixon 囉
講真,如果真係換o既,兩個方案對我黎講都冇太大影響,因為淨番o個d都幫唔倒我d乜
所以到時我反而會留意下你地會放邊個 ;) [/quote]
x 2
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-30 17:18:
dixon 咪 dixon 囉
講真,如果真係換o既,兩個方案對我黎講都冇太大影響,因為淨番o個d都幫唔倒我d乜
所以到時我反而會留意下你地會放邊個 ;) [/quote]
證明你地只顧自己而不顧低分者的利益:cool:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-12-30 17:28:
證明你地只顧自己而不顧低分者的利益:cool: [/quote]
我唔照顧低分者利益就唔駛攪咁多嘢啦，真係啋你都有味
請你唔好又响度攪分化，你今日已經唔係第一次，都唔明你乜嘢心態
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2005-12-30 17:35:
我唔照顧低分者利益就唔駛攪咁多嘢啦，真係啋你都有味
請你唔好又响度攪分化，你今日已經唔係第一次，都唔明你乜嘢心態 [/quote]
我變態架:cool: