點解西甲可以咁唔公平
呢下唔係針對碧咸,只係想知點解佢個紅牌可以取消,
但係美斯個個黃牌唔可以,
無論用任何角度重播都唔係插水,
就連人地個後衛都認埋係犯規,
點解無得取消! [quote]Originally posted by [i]hiroraymond[/i] at 2005-10-26 10:34 PM:
呢下唔係針對碧咸,
只係想知點解佢... [/quote]
巴塞有冇request取消呀??? **** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 **** [quote]Originally posted by [i]singleung[/i] at 2005-10-26 10:49 PM:
巴塞都冇上訴 [/quote]
唔怪得 佢又唔係停賽,西班牙足總費事搞 [quote]Originally posted by [i]edward1906[/i] at 2005-10-26 10:50 PM:
佢又唔係停賽,西班牙足總費事搞 [/quote]
如果紅牌就會架喇~ 我覺得碧咸個紅牌可以照俾....唔理佢拍手......對住個球証爆粗....球証有權趕你出場~ [quote]Originally posted by [i]pderek[/i] at 2005-10-26 10:55 PM:
我覺得碧咸個紅牌可以照俾....唔理佢拍手......對住個球証爆粗....球証有權趕你出場~ [/quote]
有咩:o [quote]Originally posted by [i]pderek[/i] at 2005-10-26 10:55 PM:
我覺得碧咸個紅牌可以照俾....唔理佢拍手......對住個球証爆粗....球証有權趕你出場~ [/quote]
你又知佢講粗口=.=你聽到呀!?
就算係球証都未必聽得明,佢實係講英文 [quote]Originally posted by [i]tkk2p[/i] at 2005-10-26 10:56 PM:
有咩:o [/quote]
有~都係fxxx off 0個d~
可能個球証聽唔明掛~
仲有,佢都係講off 姐~又唔係講you~ [quote]Originally posted by [i]10michaelowen[/i] at 2005-10-26 11:04 PM:
有~都係fxxx off 0個d~
可能個球証聽唔明掛~
仲有,佢都係講off 姐~又唔係講you~ [/quote]
但fxxk off係滾開...=.=" [quote]Originally posted by [i]hiroraymond[/i] at 2005-10-26 10:34 PM:
呢下唔係針對碧咸,
只係想知點解佢... [/quote]
你見皇馬今年成日都有人被遂離場~
之前又輸左兩次問題球~
就豬西甲冇偏幫皇馬la~ [quote]Originally posted by [i]10michaelowen[/i] at 2005-10-26 11:07 PM:
你見皇馬今年成日都有人被遂離場~
之前又輸左兩次問題球~
就豬西甲冇偏幫皇馬la~ [/quote]
咁又係~~ [quote]Originally posted by [i]tkk2p[/i] at 2005-10-26 11:05 PM:
但fxxk off係滾開...=.=" [/quote]
咁睇開國際大型賽事既~
都知道d英格蘭什至第二d國籍既球員次次都[f off]ga la~
都唔見d球証趕佢地出場.
同埋beckham唔係比人趕出場先爆粗既咩?
[[i] Last edited by 10michaelowen on 2005-10-26 at 11:13 PM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]10michaelowen[/i] at 2005-10-26 11:11 PM:
咁睇過國際大型賽事既球迷~
都知道d英格蘭什至第二d國籍既球員次次都[f off]ga la~
都唔見d球証趕佢地出場.
同埋beckham唔係比人趕出場先爆粗既咩? [/quote]
其實佢有冇講粗口都唔清楚~ 如果巴塞唔滿意可以去上訴,但係巴塞就去上訴就唔好話西甲唔公平啦 講真, 我真係唔信碧咸會講粗口囉, 佢都唔係粗魯o個d 球員黎o既, 如果蘇連, 柏保路加西亞講我就信
仲有佢犯一次規就俾人罰兩面黃牌, 從邊個角度睇都係針對囉
咁如果球證因為佢拍兩下手就俾兩面黃牌, 就更加於理不合, 因為拍手係連貫動作 ah ma 其實我覺得佢個解釋都幾合理丫...yahoo話..
競賽委員會認定,貝克漢姆的鼓掌行為是其第一次抗議的一部分,因此只能對他施以第一張黃牌的處罰,而不應追加紅牌。
「鼓掌發生在這名球員背對裁判,走回他在場上位置的時候,」委員會說。「此舉盡管值得譴責,但並不屬于直接對抗,應被視為他最初抗議的一部分。」
「事件本身和裁判報告均未顯示當時他是有意侮辱或蔑視裁判。」 我都覺得幾合理~ 一早都話唔應該比第二面黃牌啦,佢爆粗係攞第一面黃牌之前,球證要趕佢出場就直接紅牌,但比左黃牌就完喇,佢自己走開拍手真係唔係足夠理由再比牌,唔同朗尼,'但並不屬于直接對抗'這點好重要,朗尼就係屬于直接對抗
頁:
[1]
2