娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

myron722 發表於 2005-11-1 10:46 AM

有乜所謂
佢有咁既能力 同咁既收入

當然更係串得起啦
佢係呢個世界唯一唔得罪得既
應該就只有油王一個吧

abc123aa 發表於 2005-11-1 10:52 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]myron722[/i] at 2005-11-1 10:46 AM:
有乜所謂
佢有咁既能力 同咁既收入

當然更係串得起啦
佢係呢個世界唯一唔得罪得既
應該就只有油王一個吧 [/quote]
邊個話呀,呢個世界上佢大把人唔得罪得,你叫佢寸下教宗囉:cool:睇下d天主教徒會點.....;)

sonyguy 發表於 2005-11-1 10:53 AM

剩係講呢件事...(唔計以往佢比各位既印象係點)
如果你地覺得摩連奴今次好串...甚至係串爆咁誇張...
咁你認為摩連奴應該點回應先叫唔串??先叫大方得體呢?

係唔係...<多謝關心...唔係你提醒...我都唔發覺...我會留意下我既球隊...多謝你保貴既意見!!>
定係唔出聲...扮聽唔到先叫岩呢??

abc123aa 發表於 2005-11-1 11:15 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2005-11-1 10:53 AM:
剩係講呢件事...(唔計以往佢比各位既... [/quote]
我覺得佢呢句最寸~>要擔心的應該是自己,其他唔覺得有d咩事特別寸,我覺得佢回應敵方教練既時候冇咩問題,但輸左都賴地硬就唔好囉:)

sonyguy 發表於 2005-11-1 12:33 PM

對好多人黎講...佢既乞人憎程度已經去到爆燈...
即使佢朝早見到你同你講聲good morning...
你都覺得佢係串緊你...

(我個人唔覺得佢有問題..都唔覺得佢串...亦都唔係車仔迷...=)...~~)

abc123aa 發表於 2005-11-1 12:39 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2005-11-1 12:33 PM:
對好多人黎講...佢既乞人憎程度已經去... [/quote]
佢同我講早晨我唔會覺得佢寸我,我會好開心:D
我都唔係車仔迷,唔憎摩連奴,因為佢真係有料,但最唔鍾意佢輸波賴地硬:o

iMacc 發表於 2005-11-1 02:36 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sonyguy[/i] at 2005-11-1 12:33 PM:
對好多人黎講...佢既乞人憎程度已經去... [/quote]
X2:D

我其實都好唔明典解咁多人憎佢~

skjeiw 發表於 2005-11-1 06:04 PM

講真...摩連奴有咩貢獻呀
車仔係勁~~呢樣野無可否認
但係一睇,車仔最勁0個幾個,林柏特,馬基利尼,泰利,甚至洛賓,杜夫,施治
無一個係佢買翻黎
佢買翻黎所謂勁0既咪杜奧巴,卡華路,泰亞高,艾辛喎~~
有幾勁呀,無雲尼亞里砌得隊波咁靚,佢地舊年冠軍,早d訓啦
佢學咩人寸呀,所謂0既領導有方咪將d人擺落佢要打0既位
之後歐聯輸俾利記,連贏9場之後俾包尾0個隊逼和,再0係聯賽杯輸埋
講英超成就,雲加同費sir0係到,摩連奴行埋佢地10米範圍內都未有資格
寸人...你話你亂咁講好啦

chicken 發表於 2005-11-1 06:37 PM

摩連奴有咩貢獻?
For Man U and Arsenal of course no la.
For Chelsea he manage to win the league again since 1955.
This result is enough to let Morinho go to Hall of Fame.

Ferguson and Wenger have been in English for nearly 20 and 10 years respectively,
Morinho of course cannot compare with their results la...

But he has done one thing that Ferguson and Wenger cannot:
Win the league in the first year when coming from other teams.

[[i] Last edited by chicken on 2005-11-1 at 06:58 PM [/i]]

abcde1918 發表於 2005-11-1 06:38 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2005-10-31 07:21 PM:
佢又真係有料wo~
有性格,我鐘意~ [/quote]
me  too

fffffa 發表於 2005-11-1 07:43 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]skjeiw[/i] at 2005-11-1 06:04 PM:
講真...摩連奴有咩貢獻呀
車仔係勁~~... [/quote]
教得隊波成績好咪有資格吋人low~~~!
d人唔係佢買又點~?佢用得o岩仲駛唔駛買過呀?
[color=Red]講英超成就,雲加同費sir0係到,摩連奴行埋佢地10米範圍內都未有資格[/color]
佢2個呢期咁梅.............係我都彈開喇!

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2005-11-1 07:56 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-11-1 12:39 PM:

佢同我講早晨我唔會覺得佢寸我,我會好開心:D
我都唔係車仔迷,唔憎摩連奴,因為佢真係有料,但最唔鍾意佢輸波賴地硬:o [/quote]
認同,一和同輸波都搵exuse~
但我都覺得佢幾有料wo~
佢未黎車仔之前都係咁買人la(當然同而家無得比)
但係車仔d波不嬲都海鮮ga啦,
so咪一直拎唔到冠軍law,
佢黎左之後隊波真係穩定左好多wo~

skjeiw 發表於 2005-11-1 09:08 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2005-11-1 07:56 PM:

認同,一和同輸波都搵exuse~
但我都... [/quote]
佢地輸波就人地錯,人地好彩
又唔見佢9連勝就話人地踢得好wor

skjeiw 發表於 2005-11-1 09:10 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fffffa[/i] at 2005-11-1 07:43 PM:

教得隊波成績好咪有資格吋人low~~~!... [/quote]

你識唔識睇架...我話講成就,你都識highlight la,我又唔係講佢呢期掂唔掂
九唔搭八...

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2005-11-1 09:16 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]skjeiw[/i] at 2005-11-1 09:08 PM:

佢地輸波就人地錯,人地好彩
又唔見佢9連勝就話人地踢得好wor [/quote]
SO我咪話佢衰在一和同輸波都搵exuse law~

abc123aa 發表於 2005-11-2 12:27 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2005-11-1 07:56 PM:

認同,一和同輸波都搵exuse~
但我都... [/quote]
我覺得佢輸波有d風度比較好囉,連互射12碼都唔射唔贏對方仲搵藉口出黎賴地硬......仲要冇啦啦搵侯夫射,連個天都唔比佢攞三冠王.......真係唔輸攞黎輸:o

luisy 發表於 2005-11-2 02:23 PM

morhnino is so inch that i dislike him.

pakho 發表於 2005-11-2 07:35 PM

:cool:
阿仙奴主帥雲格正考慮對(摩連奴)的尖銳人身攻擊採取法律行動,並暗示稱切爾西車路士主帥很愚蠢。

在阿森納主帥批評衛冕冠軍可能喪失自信後,莫里尼奧上周末表示溫格對切爾西著了魔,是個「偷窺狂」。

「我認為這簡直荒謬,與事實不符,也很無禮,」溫格周二向記者們表示。

「我會考慮是否採取措施,我目前尚不清楚,但我保留這種可能。」

「我不知道我的說法哪裡有惡意。當我被問到一個關於切爾西的問題時,我如實給出了答案。」

「我只是認為,成功降臨到蠢人的頭上,會讓他們變得更愚蠢,而不是聰明起來。我對切爾西沒興趣,我目前在俱樂部(球會)令人很開心。」

skjeiw 發表於 2005-11-2 09:19 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]chicken[/i] at 2005-11-1 06:37 PM:
摩連奴有咩貢獻?
For Man U and Arse... [/quote]
but the squad had already been so strong when he came...

timduncan21 發表於 2005-11-2 10:13 PM

a classic pix

頁: 1 2 [3] 4

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.