nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-4-10 06:17 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]甘國武[/i] at 2006-4-10 06:15 PM:
係ar,而且我唔想佢多人幾個就退休~ [/quote]
我諗kidd都係打多2,3季就退休~
now都好似33歲lu, 老多一,兩歲唔知仲可唔可以咁全能呢?;)
甘國武 發表於 2006-4-10 06:21 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-4-10 06:24 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]甘國武[/i] at 2006-4-10 06:21 PM:
地板型控衛壽命都好長架,如助攻榜一、二位的史托頓、馬積遜~ [/quote]
but kidd ge投射能力唔多好,
老左ge得分能力就弱左好多la~
張丕德估計過nash 的籃球壽命應該長過kidd,因為nash射波好準~
甘國武 發表於 2006-4-10 06:27 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-4-10 06:28 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]甘國武[/i] at 2006-4-10 06:27 PM:
kidd得分能力,係走位同靠團隊互相拉空既!
仲有,我都唔信nash的籃球壽命長過kidd!!! [/quote]
點解呢?
甘國武 發表於 2006-4-10 06:42 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
kgkgkg212121 發表於 2006-4-10 08:19 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]甘國武[/i] at 2006-4-10 06:21 PM:
地板型控衛壽命都好長架,如助攻榜一、二位的史托頓、馬積遜~ [/quote]
係ar~因為唔會打d太過體能化ge波, 相對地唔會用太多體力去打
Kian76 發表於 2006-4-10 08:31 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-4-10 08:19 PM:
係ar~因為唔會打d太過體能化ge波, 相對地唔會用太多體力去打 [/quote]
單單係唔使不斷跑、入楔、突破就己經至少節省近一半既體力啦!!
Kian76 發表於 2006-4-10 08:33 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]甘國武[/i] at 2006-4-10 06:27 PM:
kidd得分能力,係走位同靠團隊互相拉空既!
仲有,我都唔信nash的籃球壽命長過kidd!!! [/quote]
拿殊點會長過傑特呀??佢經常要作個人突破,而且佢靠既好多係快攻,身體又唔係話大隻,唔似傑特,再加埋而家既佢失誤己經多,控球己經唔算好穩,老左之後仲會更蝦碌。
nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-4-10 11:33 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-10 08:33 PM:
拿殊點會長過傑特呀??佢經常要... [/quote]
講得都啱wo,將攻擊力與壽命撈埋黎講tim....
咁如果話nash ge攻擊力唔會因年紀上升而大幅下降,
因佢主要得分來源係射波,咁有無問題?
Kian76 發表於 2006-4-10 11:40 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-4-10 11:33 PM:
講得都啱wo,將攻擊力與壽命撈埋黎講tim....
咁如果話nash ge攻擊力唔會因年紀上升而大幅下降,
因佢主要得分來源係射波,咁有無問題? [/quote]
問題係佢既準係要依賴對手放鬆左對佢既防守所得(需知道太陽幾咁多炮手),你都唔係末見過佢打小牛架啦,當時人地專防三條友:司機、芬尼同埋佢,佢既得分能力咪低囉(唔算好低),佢唔係進步左,而只係隊波同佢夾,大家互相影響。過多幾年佢再難以帶領太陽快攻的話,到時被放棄的話佢既籃球生命便會近乎完結。
佢而家盛年既防守都咁,難講佢體能下降後的防守有幾咁"""穩陣"""。
Chenjinnan 發表於 2006-4-10 11:52 PM
唔同嘅... Kidd 話晒大過 Nash 成過碼... 以 Kidd 打 PG,又唔多鏟籃,可以打得耐過單薄得黎又要鏟籃嘅 Nash 都唔奇,Nash 一個唔好彩傷野甘就可以收工囉... (Kidd 係唯一一個骨裂傷完仲可以打得番嘅奇蹟... (8 個 TDBL 啦,痴線)...果然係神奇小子)
Kian76 發表於 2006-4-11 12:16 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Chenjinnan[/i] at 2006-4-10 11:52 PM:
唔同嘅... Kidd 話晒大過 Nash 成過碼... [/quote]
而家我己經開始擔心Iverson可以撐多幾多季先會現老態。希望佢好似佐郭咁打到34都咁勁啦。
brightlee 發表於 2006-4-11 01:43 PM
for Nash, it depends.....
if he may switch to 2 guards at the end of his career...
i.e. like Danny Ainge... his career can be really long.......
FRANCISE 發表於 2006-4-11 03:20 PM
Nuggets (44-34), who won their first division title since capturing the Midwest crown in 1988. Denver will be the third seed in the Western Conference playoffs. :good:
nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-4-11 07:06 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-10 11:40 PM:
佢而家盛年既防守都咁,難講佢體能下降後的防守有幾咁"""穩陣""" [/quote]
咁又係....好似以前Stockton咁,睇佢好似好瘦,
但其實防守幾好,比想像中硬淨得多,甚至有時會出D陰濕招保護自己,
所以打到咁耐.....
nash d防守...........過多幾年真係大漏洞......加上滿場飛打法......
睇完各位咁講,諗法又唔同lu~
nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-4-11 07:10 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-4-11 12:16 AM:
而家我己經開始擔心Iverson可以撐多幾多季先會現老態。希望佢好似佐郭咁打到34都咁勁啦。 [/quote]
前2,3年巳經有球評家估佢過30歲之後就開始退........
但今年ai 好似仲癲過以前.......
雖然我對佢ge感覺一般,但都想佢撐耐d, 見到佢打波嗰種精神,
真係希望佢可以一嘗冠軍滋味~:gun:
甘國武 發表於 2006-4-11 07:13 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-4-11 07:41 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]甘國武[/i] at 2006-4-11 07:13 PM:
後衛只要唔係飛人型,都ok耐架....一般~ [/quote]
但射波要準law,
不過ai 呢方面都有進步~
但3分就一般la~
甘國武 發表於 2006-4-11 08:58 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
頁:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
[12]
13
14
15
16
17