[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:41 AM:
where did you find the news ??? [/quote]
[b]Dec. 2, 2005 - 11:12 am et [/b]
Channing Frye was named the NBA's Eastern Conference Rookie of the Month for November.
He ranks second in scoring (14.2 ppg), field goal percentage (.511 percent) and blocks (.85 bpg) and third in rebounding (6.1 rpg) among all rookies.
[b]Dec. 1, 2005 - 10:23 am et [/b]
Larry Brown said last night that Channing Frye will remain in the starting lineup when Eddy Curry returns.
The Knicks will probably eventually settle on a starting lineup that includes Nate Robinson, Stephon Marbury, Trevor Ariza, Frye and Curry.
Source: New York Post
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:43 AM:
[b]Dec. 2, 2005 - 11:12 am et... [/quote]
Frye is a really good center... has pts, rebs and avg 1 blk ... he also has high FG% and FT% ...
I am giving u the offer now ... but i might change my mind tomolo gah...
so make up ur mind :D
er..........if I choose Dalembert , is that okay ???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:49 AM:
er..........if I choose Dalembert , is that okay ??? [/quote]
then u need to change parker to cassell ...
ok ?
I am flying to taiwan on the 5th of Dec...
I wanna make this trade confirm before i go...
[[i] Last edited by Xtravagant on 2005-12-3 at 12:52 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:51 AM:
then u need to change parker to... [/quote]
change parker to cassel for Dalembert ???
I think parker is already qualified for Dalembert ......... don't you agree ???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:54 AM:
change parker to cassel for Dalembert ???
I think parker is already qualified for Dalembert ......... don't you agree ??? [/quote]
calculating ... wait
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:58 AM:
calculating ... wait [/quote]
how you make the calculation ???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 01:00 AM:
how you make the calculation ??? [/quote]
just by adding up the asts / blks / pts
hmm... I will gain pts and assists ...
but loose heavily on blks and rebs... and also increase TO ...
I cant trade u dalembert ... (he give me lots of rebs and blks)
if it is Frye then it should be no problem...
u got mourning la, he is a good source of rebs and BLK ... my dalembert is just a counter part of him... u dun need to have both of them right?
[[i] Last edited by Xtravagant on 2005-12-3 at 01:11 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-12-3 01:09 AM:
just by adding up the asts / ... [/quote]
dalembert 我認為咁計唔岩數 wor..........
點睇呢個都合理啦............ 我use pt 黎換左 reb.......
佢幾個都有pt, 我主要係想要穩定d既reb............
我覺得呢個算係咁........請你成全吧 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-12-3 01:09 AM:
just by adding up the asts / ... [/quote]
mourning 係點真係要等oneal返黎先知.........我要有放佢走既心理準備呢 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 01:13 AM:
dalembert 我認為咁計唔岩數 wor.... [/quote]
I realize if I had Dalembert my teams reb and Blk will be very steady ...
I can afford to have low scoring ... but i cant afford to have low rebs and blks ...
i am sure u know a person who gives 3.0 blks is hard to find...he is also a guy who s capable of grabbing 15+ rebs a game when he is healthy...
if u give cassell, who can fill up my other stats then I think the trade is fine lor ...
but Parker.. only give pts and assists ...
[[i] Last edited by Xtravagant on 2005-12-3 at 01:18 AM [/i]]
如果出左cassel, 雙方個range又會大左嫁啦............
果個offer對大家都有幫助 ~
但假如轉左 cassel, 我就會死嫁啦...........
請你考慮下吧 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 01:22 AM:
如果出左cassel, 雙方個range又會大左嫁啦............
果個offer對大家都有幫助 ~
但假如轉左 cassel, 我就會死嫁啦...........
請你考慮下吧 ~ [/quote]
if u need to take Dalembert... then I really cant trade lar sorry ...
I really took a deep thought abt it ...
if u just want steady rebs then .. Randolph vs Illgauskas <== u already have more rebs
if I give u dalembert I will loose alot rebs wor ... i cant afford that sorry
[[i] Last edited by Xtravagant on 2005-12-3 at 01:33 AM [/i]]
er...........ok ~
咁你落offer啦..........不過我可唔可以睇埋聽日場波先accept ?
我想confirm佢係正選........
sleep la~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 01:45 AM:
sleep la~ [/quote]
ok i need to sleep also
佢冇正選wor...........
actually, 你睇下JJ表現已經好返 ~
2換2都唔係唔得姐.........
how come u2 guys think cassell is better than parker?!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 09:47 AM:
佢冇正選wor...........
actually, 你睇下JJ表現已經好返 ~
2換2都唔係唔得姐......... [/quote]
ok la
2 for 2 la
Illgauskas + JJ for
Randolph + Wells ?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-3 10:30 AM:
how come u2 guys think cassell is better than parker?! [/quote]
parker just giv u two catergoreys....pts , assists ... these players hav less value compare to ppl like Ginobili / cassell who can do more than just pts/ assists