[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-12-3 10:49 AM:
parker just giv u two catergoreys....pts , assists ... these players hav less value compare to ppl like Ginobili / cassell who can do more than just pts/ assists [/quote]
俾我揀我會揀 parker
用佢黎 trade 人都可以換倒個勁d o既返黎
eg. r. wallace --> anthony --> b. miller
s. jackson --> hughes
randolph --> webber
所以雖然清揚講o既野係岩,但名氣都係好重要 (esp trade人時)
換人就要換一個比之前好
如果你keep住用當然冇問題
但如果你第時會trade走o既, 相信parker會多d人想要
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-3 11:03 AM:
俾我揀我會揀 parker
用佢黎 trade... [/quote]
有道理bor ;)
自從S.Jackson 換 Hughes 之後。 我add人都謹慎好多。
可以話無令我失望. D. Williams, Frye, Dalembert, Szerbiak...等等
[[i] Last edited by Xtravagant on 2005-12-3 at 11:11 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-12-3 11:07 AM:
有道理bor ;)
自從S.Jackson ... [/quote]
放走左 Dalembert 兩次...
今次有d睇漏眼~
d防守力真係幾好
我想trade o既話可以點?
我正需要佢o既 reb 同 blk
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-12-3 10:47 AM:
ok la
2 for 2 la
Illgauskas + JJ for
Randolph + Wells ? [/quote]
yup ~
好, 交易左啦 ~
不過本人都仲係放緊 T.Parker ~
有興趣既請講 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:33 PM:
好, 交易左啦 ~
不過本人都仲係放緊 T.Parker ~
有興趣既請講 ~ [/quote]
it seems u are the better side of this trade
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:38 PM:
it seems u are the better side of this trade [/quote]
都係咁上下, 你睇下今場JJ幾強先得嫁 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:43 PM:
都係咁上下, 你睇下今場JJ幾強先得嫁 ~ [/quote]
一場唔代表一季
Randolph + Wells 夠穩定,有水準; 前者得分+reb; 後者全面
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:46 PM:
一場唔代表一季
Randolph + Wells 夠穩定,有水準; 前者得分+reb; 後者全面 [/quote]
睇你點諗 law ~
JJ 係主力黎呢 ~
T.Parker 有冇興趣換 ?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:50 PM:
睇你點諗 law ~
JJ 係主力黎呢 ~
T.Parker 有冇興趣換 ? [/quote]
冇
已夠 pg 用
wells 就有興趣
Randolph + Wells 夠係主力
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:53 PM:
冇
已夠 pg 用
wells 就有興趣
Randolph + Wells 夠係主力 [/quote]
wells ???
你咪又係出walker.............
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:54 PM:
wells ???
你咪又係出walker............. [/quote]
之前係因為你地覺得佢差, 我先出walker, 之前連 CV 都可以簽倒添
1 trade 1 就唔會
到時睇下你有d咩球員先傾啦
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:56 PM:
之前係因為你地覺得佢差, 我先出walker, 之前連 CV 都可以簽倒添
1 trade 1 就唔會
到時睇下你有d咩球員先傾啦 [/quote]
我諗now我唔會再換人住嫁啦............
只係放T.Parker........
只好慢慢等人搵我吧 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 12:59 PM:
我諗now我唔會再換人住嫁啦............
只係放T.Parker........
只好慢慢等人搵我吧 ~ [/quote]
我都係
你個trade嬴 pts, reb, stl; 輸 3pt, blk
不過你換走左 zi 之後, 其他3個center都唔穩陣
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-3 01:08 PM:
我都係
你個trade嬴 pts, reb, stl; 輸 3pt, blk
不過你換走左 zi 之後, 其他3個center都唔穩陣 [/quote]
哈哈, 呢個就一定嫁啦 ~
我反而唔介意 ~
我睇既只係能力 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-3 01:08 PM:
我都係
你個trade嬴 pts, reb, stl; 輸 3pt, blk
不過你換走左 zi 之後, 其他3個center都唔穩陣 [/quote]
zi 都唔見得有幾穩陣...........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 07:32 PM:
zi 都唔見得有幾穩陣........... [/quote]
而家黎講,係 mourning, lafrentz/ zi, mihm
第時就係 lafrentz/ mourning, mihm
mihm 真係唔掂架,你搵定center啦
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-12-3 19:32:
zi 都唔見得有幾穩陣........... [/quote]
可悲:cool:
艾兄，我對你嘅 C. Webber、V. Carter 同 S. Marbury 都有啲興趣，唔知你 trade 唔 trade 嫁呢， trade 嘅不妨開個 offer 嚟研究下
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2005-12-3 20:01:
艾兄，我對你嘅 C. Webber、V. Carter 同 S. Marbury 都有啲興趣，唔知你 trade 唔 trade 嫁呢， trade 嘅不妨開個 offer 嚟研究下 [/quote]
V.C可斟,其它免問,特別系S.M~