[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-1-9 13:39:
一味射,射,射~人地又有番甘上下FG... [/quote]
此處不同彼處,kg速度是快,但夠A.i快,靈活嗎??;)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-1-9 01:36 PM:
[color=Red]無謂為左3pts去不進則退[/color],sbk根本同我個rip冇乜分別,一味射,射,射~
呢D人冇人會like架,u know???;) [/quote]
你個3PTM 同 TO 既情況就好似我 REB 同AST甘。
我去食LUNCH ~閃人 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-1-9 13:44:
你個3PTM 同 TO 既情況就好似我 REB 同AST甘。
我去[color=Red]食LUNCH [/color]~閃人 ~ [/quote]
me too
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-1-9 13:39:
一味射,射,射~人地又有番甘上下FG... [/quote]
見你講開呢個話題，我又不妨問下大家嘅觀感。
大家覺得呢 9 項統計數字嘅選擇點樣，加多啲乜同減少啲乜會好啲，或者可以响出年個 league 度調整下﹙係唔係仲係我攪都好﹚
先回應 Xtravagant 嘅意見，增加 FGM 呢一項統計確實可以提升射手嘅重要性，我開 league 之前都曾經諗過，但係可能衍生以下問題，所以最終都無用到：
1. 加多一項統計之後就變成 10 個統計數字即係雙數嚟，為免經常出現打和賽果﹙特別係季後賽果陣﹚，有需要增加第 11 個統計數字，但係第 11 個統計數字真係好難揀
2. 曾經諗過嘅統計數字仲有 Minutes Played 、 Free Throws Made 、 Assist/Turnover Ratio 、 Personal Fouls 等等。用得 FGM 通常都會計埋 FTM ，但係兩樣計晒又驚會過份地對射手有利，你都知有啲 C 場場都已經得果幾分，仲要蝕埋 FGM 同 FTM 咪好傷。
3. 太多嘅統計數字會令個 league 好複雜，依家用緊果個係 default setting 嚟嘅，感覺上好似會平均啲
4. 反而我覺得個 league 嘅球隊數目仲可以 set 多啲。初時擔心會有太多 inactive player，所以特登 set 少啲隊數。 So far 個 league只係得一個植物人，其實已經唔錯。但係，既然我哋已經 work out 咗套處理 inactive player 嘅法則，如果真係可以成功落實嘅話，出年又真係未必需要太擔心啲 inactive player 喎
5. 比較起過去幾年，我覺得今年識到嘅 nba 球員好似少咗，主要係因為隊波好早已經夠球員用，根本唔需要去發掘果啲工兵球員﹙回應清揚兄嘅批評，唔係我唔識欣賞佢哋，而係今年個 setting 根本唔需要太多工兵球員﹚。好多 manager﹙例如 shut 同我﹚成日都覺得 fa 入面有太多好球員但係唔知放棄邊個嚟簽，好似 J. Posey、E. Griffin 同 A. Nocioni 呢啲又有 3pts 又有 blk 嘅球員，俾著以前簡直當佢哋係寶啦，點會好似依家咁唔係嫌出場時間唔夠多，就嫌人哋射波唔夠準，呢個好明顯係球隊數目太少嘅結果。
有意見嘅不妨發表一下
[[i] Last edited by 秋葉林 on 2006-1-9 at 02:36 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-9 02:34 PM:
見你講開呢個話題，我又不妨問... [/quote]
我意見
1) 我覺得個CATERGOREY 好似而家甘就夠喇﹐再加會複雜左同埋過份有利於射手。
2) 我覺得個LEAGUE去到 12 個MANAGER 就夠了。 10 -12 都算不錯。
3) 你可以增加一隊波可以擁有球員既數目。而家我地有13個﹐可以去到14 - 15 個 (如果12 MANAGERS 每隊波13-14 人就夠了﹐ 如果10 MANAGERS 每隊波 14-15 就好D)
不過我都幾滿意秋兄你目前既設定﹐話晒到LEAGUE有好多新人(包括我自己) 如果一開始太複雜既話好多人需要更長時間去適應。 以上意見可以在下季考慮。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-9 14:34:
見你講開呢個話題，我又不妨問... [/quote]
對我來說
你set d 乜都冇問題,因為我只會按自己意願做事:cool:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-1-9 02:50 PM:
對我來說
你set d 乜都冇問題,因為我只會按自己意願做事:cool: [/quote]
近日少見FREDDY ??? WER ???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2006-1-9 14:59:
近日少見FREDDY ??? WER ??? [/quote]
freddy???下年先la,自重上次佢失算被我噴到一面屁後便收左皮了,wer根本只在乎參與:cool:
唉,3pts炮手真難揾~
7:2,又出現一隊勁旅,當布沙及巴朗去埋佢隊波我貼佢隊波可一ROUND全勝,因為只有呢隊波既誤差最低:mad:
咪就係因為你之前話射手無用，所以咪俾我簽晒囉：R. Allen、J. Williams、M. Redd、R. Lewis、D. Marshall ……
J. Williams你要唔要呀，佢話晒都有 2.4 個 3 pts 一場。你咁多 ast 要嚟賣呀，啱晒啦
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-9 16:23:
咪就係因為你之前話射手無用，所以咪... [/quote]
到時我咁多pg真系扲黎賣喇~:lol:
閣下隊波我只對redd有興趣:cool:
[[i] Last edited by 清揚 on 2006-1-9 at 04:28 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-9 02:34 PM:
見你講開呢個話題，我又不妨問... [/quote]
1) 我覺得個CATERGOREY 好似而家甘就夠喇﹐再加會複雜左同埋過份有利於射手。
2) 我覺得個LEAGUE去到 12 個MANAGER 就夠了。 10 -12 都算不錯。
同意 xtravagant o既依2點~
manager 人數可以加到 12
但球員人數就唔好加喇, 一來未必有咁多適合o既人add, 二來迫住要成日轉陣, 而計數亦都麻煩
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-1-9 04:16 PM:
7:2,又出現一隊勁旅,當布沙及巴朗去埋佢隊波我貼佢隊波可一ROUND全勝,因為只有呢隊波既誤差最低:mad: [/quote]
how about turnover and shooting %? ;)
我隊波o係高峰時都係嬴倒7分, 秋兄都係 :o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-1-9 16:31:
how about turnover and shooting %? ;)
我隊波o係高峰時都係嬴倒7分, 秋兄都係 :o [/quote]
你上次輸4-5比X:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-1-9 04:33 PM:
你上次輸4-5比X:) [/quote]
但我嬴梗4項, 佢又嬴梗2項, 仲有3項不明朗o既stat都俾佢嬴埋姐 :(
何況我都冇 shooter, 嬴到開巷o既 pts 都要輸~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-9 04:23 PM:
咪就係因為你之前話射手無用，所以咪... [/quote]
我隊波需要 sg 同 pf 呀, 你o係手指la漏d俾我呀
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-1-9 16:31:
how about turnover and shooting %? ;)
我隊波o係高峰時都係嬴倒7分, 秋兄都係 :o [/quote]
出嚟認下叻先，暫時一週對賽成績最好係我，贏到 7 : 1 即係 7.5 場
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-1-9 16:37:
我隊波需要 sg 同 pf 呀, 你o係手指la漏d俾我呀 [/quote]
而家睇你team都有D散散地~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-1-9 16:40:
而家睇你team都有D散散地~ [/quote]
too bad