[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-13 00:31:
我又好似 ming 哥果單嘢咁 trade 咗俾你先喇，不過你可以承諾點幫番我先 [/quote]
你想呢?
你似食ming隻車多D媧
Kaman???:lol::lol::lol:
tomorrow再傾~
Kaman???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-1-13 12:33 AM:
你想呢?
你似食ming隻車多D媧
Kaman???:lol::lol::lol: [/quote]
乜係 A.J trade Kaman ?
如果出 Kaman.........我諗要 2 trade 2 先得.............
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-12 22:12:
清揚兄，其實我想要 kaman 同 west，你要 pf，ming 哥就想 trade 下人，三角交易有無得諗呀 [/quote]
大佬呀，唔係駛乜攪三角交易呀，我一開始已經講得好清楚嫁啦
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-13 12:40 AM:
大佬呀，唔係駛乜攪三角交易呀，我一開始已經講得好清楚嫁啦 [/quote]
ic.......原來你係想換佢...........
actually 我有排先訓...........如果你仲有時間, 可以傾下點2 trade 2 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-1-13 00:42:
ic.......原來你係想換佢...........
actually 我有排先訓...........如果你仲有時間, 可以傾下點2 trade 2 ~ [/quote]
無問題呀
先從呢個 offer 開始傾起呀
你覺得 A. Jamison 換 C. Kaman 有問題咩，我計過我要蝕喎
你覺得邊度有問題呀
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-13 12:47 AM:
無問題呀
先從呢個 offer 開始傾起呀
你覺得 A. Jamison 換 C. Kaman 有問題咩，我計過我要蝕喎
你覺得邊度有問題呀 [/quote]
data 上係冇咩問題........但係對我黎講有問題........如位置和方針上既問題 ~
再者, 照近況.........kaman 可以話係超好, 而A.J.明顯回落...........當然上邊既先係重點 ~
所以, 如果要 trade kaman, 一定要第2人度 balance 返 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-13 12:47 AM:
無問題呀
先從呢個 offer 開始傾起呀
你覺得 A. Jamison 換 C. Kaman 有問題咩，我計過我要蝕喎
你覺得邊度有問題呀 [/quote]
actually, 我諗住你係 trade R.J and Hill...........所以先覺得奇怪 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-1-13 00:53:
data 上係冇咩問題........但係對... [/quote]
我對 R. Jefferson 同 G. Hill 係有興趣嘅，但係由始至終我都強調要有 C. Kaman 先有得傾
如果係位置上嘅問題， C 方面我一定幫你唔到，所以先至提出三角交易呢條橋。其實你嚟緊都有 O'Neal 啦，點解唔可以放 C. Kaman
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-13 01:01 AM:
我對 R. Jefferson 同 G. Hill 係... [/quote]
唔知點講好.............總之如要換 Kaman, 我諗最易傾係搭 Hill 做個 2 trade2 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-1-13 01:09:
唔知點講好.............總之如要換 Kaman, 我諗最易傾係搭 Hill 做個 2 trade2 ~ [/quote]
你咁睇都無可厚非，Kaman 呢排係超好，你有權議價，但係咁唔代表佢可以用嚟 trade A. Stoudemire ，大家都係 C :)
始終 AJ 同 C. Kaman 係兩個級數唔同嘅球員，我諗呢點你唔會唔認同呱
搭 G. Hill 做個 2 trade 2 無問題，但係如果你堅持 A. Jamison 係比 C. Kaman 差嘅話，咁傾落去只係浪費時間，因為我係唔會用個高級過 G. Hill 嘅人同你 2 trade 2
除咗 AJ 之外，你仲想要邊個
[[i] Last edited by 秋葉林 on 2006-1-13 at 01:21 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-13 01:20 AM:
你咁睇都無可厚非，Kaman 呢排... [/quote]
redd , knight ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-1-13 01:38:
redd , knight ~ [/quote]
C. Kaman 搭 R. Jefferson 都仲可以考慮，搭 G. Hill 無可能
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-13 01:48 AM:
C. Kaman 搭 R. Jefferson 都仲可以考慮，搭 G. Hill 無可能 [/quote]
係咪一定要Kaman做贍 ?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-1-13 01:51:
係咪一定要Kaman做贍 ? [/quote]
暫時係
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-13 01:52 AM:
暫時係 [/quote]
假如佢 + R.J, 換到乜 ?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-1-13 01:58:
假如佢 + R.J, 換到乜 ? [/quote]
AH / AJ + knight
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-13 01:59 AM:
AH / AJ + knight [/quote]
AJ + Redd 呢 ?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-1-13 02:02:
AJ + Redd 呢 ? [/quote]
NO LA
[quote]Originally posted by [i]秋葉林[/i] at 2006-1-13 02:03 AM:
NO LA [/quote]
但你答應左拉埋Hill落水.............right ?