娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

清揚 發表於 2005-11-22 09:38 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-22 21:37:


so quick ? :o I didnt expect it to be so quick ...

艾力克 => dont worry u will get Wells, cos I dont like him much ... give me 1 more week to observer CV and I will trade with u ok ? [/quote]
Thx我 la,我有份投架~

清揚 發表於 2005-11-22 09:39 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-11-22 21:33:

實力比出場時間重要
fisher 同 parker 相差不遠

[b]wells 個 trade cancel 左? :o[/b] [/quote]
我不會要後備不要正選low~

清揚 發表於 2005-11-22 09:41 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-22 21:38:


Z. Pachulia 比 Okafor 好咩 ? [/quote]
實力差不多,Okafor Win 名氣堵~

清揚 發表於 2005-11-22 09:43 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-11-22 21:33:

實力比出場時間重要
fisher 同 parker 相差不遠

[b]wells 個 trade cancel 左? :o[/b] [/quote]
S.parker 比 fisher好的是可打所有後衛位~

fantesticming05 發表於 2005-11-22 09:43 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-11-22 09:43 PM:

S.parker 比 fisher好的是可打所有後衛位~ [/quote]

但係最近 S.parker 表現回落 wor........

Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-22 09:43 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-22 09:38 PM:


Z. Pachulia 比 Okafor 好咩 ? [/quote]

雖然我覺得OKAFOR系無上年甘勁.
但系OKAFOR系你TRADE番來, 而ZAZA系WAIVE番來...
dont not trade OKAFOR for ZAZA

Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-22 09:45 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-22 09:43 PM:


但係最近 S.parker 表現回落 wor........ [/quote]

S.Parker wont be as useful as Ridnour (he has really high rating by most NBA analysis)

清揚 發表於 2005-11-22 09:45 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-22 21:43:


但係最近 S.parker 表現回落 wor........ [/quote]
人有三衰六旺~

清揚 發表於 2005-11-22 09:50 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-22 21:43:


但係最近 S.parker 表現回落 wor........ [/quote]
我出offer唔會要你地"蝕大勺"既~

Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-22 09:50 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-11-22 09:45 PM:

人有三衰六旺~ [/quote]
Here are some prove of S.Parker :

[b]Nov. 21 - 12:50 am et[/b]

Smush Parker hit just 3-of-12 shots and finished with two threes, two steals and eight points in the loss.
Phil Jackson may be close to pulling him out of the starting lineup, meaning you should be too.

[b]Nov. 19, 2005 - 1:37 am et  [/b]


Smush Parker had 10 points, four boards and four assists tonight in the Laker loss.
He had zero steals and one three, and owners who scooped him up are now thinking about dropping him. He will probably average 10 points and one three per game, as opposed to the 20 and 2.5 he started the year off with.

[b]Nov. 17, 2005 - 1:09 am et  [/b]
Smush Parker had 10 points, four rebounds, three assists, one steal and one three tonight.
He's not been nearly as effective as he was in the first week, but he's still holding some fantasy value.


如果你甘都仲要話他好過Ridnour, I won't bother argue with u

thx for ur vote :D :cool:

[[i] Last edited by Xtravagant on 2005-11-22 at 09:53 PM [/i]]

清揚 發表於 2005-11-22 09:53 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-22 21:50:

Here are some prove of S.Parker :... [/quote]
:)

Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-22 09:59 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-11-22 09:53 PM:

:) [/quote]

其實你個ZAZA吾系吾勁. 只系名氣吾及好多一級球星. 系果D留番比自己用,但又賣吾出高價既球員.

好似David West甘, 勁但系無人會拿個球星來換他

其實我玩到目前為止, 都不得不服你既眼光. 偏偏拿到呢D不起眼但又好穩陣既球員. 而家真系買少見少

fantesticming05 發表於 2005-11-22 10:01 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-22 09:59 PM:


其實你個ZAZA吾系吾勁. 只系名氣... [/quote]

講得岩 ~
證明佢對NBA真係好有認識 ~

清揚 發表於 2005-11-22 10:05 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-22 21:59:


其實你個ZAZA吾系吾勁. 只系名氣... [/quote]
我隊波簽得既全都有一定價值,人系我負責選既,同你地Trade果D offer就由我細佬負責既~

清揚 發表於 2005-11-22 10:07 PM

我冇睇少Pachulia ,睇少佢我點敢從垃圾堆中執黎自用,我只想Tarde下人堵~

[[i] Last edited by 清揚 on 2005-11-22 at 10:08 PM [/i]]

fantesticming05 發表於 2005-11-22 10:08 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-11-22 10:05 PM:

我隊波簽得既全都有一定價值,人系我負責選既,同你地Trade果D offer就由我細佬負責既~ [/quote]

清揚, 正如頭先Xtravagant所提出既消息, 我真係接受唔係呢個offer..........sorry ~

until now.........我仲係想換 webber, 不如 shut up 你出條件啦 ~

Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-22 10:10 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-22 10:01 PM:


講得岩 ~
證明佢對NBA真係好有認識 ~ [/quote]

個league如果無一兩個呢D對手就吾好玩啦系咪?

如果要我講我覺得Godson1系一開始班波都好齊無需點樣搞都可以拿到點成績. 但如果吾識一路keep住買番D勁人就好容易臨尾輸.

但清揚就相反,距到目前都系有keep住留意自己隊波需要點improve. 呢類對手比較難對付

Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-22 10:14 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-11-22 10:07 PM:
我冇睇少Pachulia ,睇少佢我點敢從垃圾堆中執黎自用,我只想Tarde下人堵~

[[i] Last edited by 清揚 on 2005-11-22 at 10:08 PM [/i]] [/quote]

I was going to get him but my Waiver rank was lower than you :D

我自己覺得PF/C 呢個屬性既球員最好用.
就算能力差少少, 如果對方系PF/C我都好樂意去trade.

so I always thought Zaza is a good player to use :D

But since now he is in your hand, I will have to give up on him :cool:

[[i] Last edited by Xtravagant on 2005-11-22 at 10:15 PM [/i]]

清揚 發表於 2005-11-22 10:14 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-22 22:10:


個league如果無一兩個呢D對手就吾... [/quote]
冇你地掉人去垃圾堆,我點會執到D筍野丫,我只系垃圾佬一名堵~

Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-22 10:17 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2005-11-22 10:14 PM:

冇你地掉人去垃圾堆,我點會執到D筍野丫,我只系垃圾佬一名堵~ [/quote]

WER :P

頁: 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.