fantesticming05 發表於 2005-11-26 11:22 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:17 AM:
佢唔換 prince, 係因為唔想有兩個活塞球員
換左o既話, 變左有 3個 utah, 2個 det [/quote]
ic.........咁我再諗諗啦 ~
嘩, 呢場 R. LaFrentz 超勁, 有得分, 有3pt, 有reb, 有bs ~
Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-26 11:23 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:07 AM:
咁點解你唔直接換prince呢 ???
er..........假如2換1, 咁我點都要放一個走 ~
倒不如我出2個, 你就唔出J.Johnson, 出個強d既得唔得 ? [/quote]
換E兩個球員Wells + S.Jackson 應該對我隊波影響不大。
所以其他人我暫時吾打算換...我只喜歡J.Johnson一個,其他人暫時吾想換住。
fantesticming05 發表於 2005-11-26 11:25 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:23 AM:
換E兩個球員Wells + S.Jackson 應該對我隊波影響不大。
所以其他人我暫時吾打算換...我只喜歡J.Johnson一個,其他人暫時吾想換住。 [/quote]
J.Johnson 我肯出, 但都要幫到我先得 ~
假如我J.Johnson + T.Parker, 你可唔可以唔出S.Jackson, 出個強d既 ?
Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-26 11:25 AM
我好傻, 我臨住AK今日會上所以bench左最近打得吾系幾好既Szerbiak,點知他拿了30分6個板仲有2個BLKS...
fantesticming05 發表於 2005-11-26 11:26 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:25 AM:
我好傻, 我臨住AK今日會上所以bench左最近打得吾系幾好既Szerbiak,點知他拿了30分6個板仲有2個BLKS... [/quote]
wa..............
艾力克 發表於 2005-11-26 11:28 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:22 AM:
ic.........咁我再諗諗啦 ~
嘩, 呢場 R. LaFrentz 超勁, 有得分, 有3pt, 有reb, 有bs ~ [/quote]
勸你都唔係唔好放佢
用佢又未必 trade 倒一個好好o既返黎,但有佢打 center 對你隊波都幾好
fantesticming05 發表於 2005-11-26 11:29 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:28 AM:
勸你都唔係唔好放佢
用佢又未必 trade 倒一個好好o既返黎,但有佢打 center 對你隊波都幾好 [/quote]
哈哈, 都冇人換佢 ~
Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-26 11:29 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:25 AM:
J.Johnson 我肯出, 但都要幫到我先得 ~
假如我J.Johnson + T.Parker, 你可唔可以唔出S.Jackson, 出個強d既 ? [/quote]
I dont want two Spurs ... S.Jackson 最近 stats 又的確好難令你接受。 我明白。我其實系想你拿了Jackson之後可以自己同清揚換Prince. 因為之前你話你想要Prince
艾力克 發表於 2005-11-26 11:29 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:25 AM:
我好傻, 我臨住AK今日會上所以bench左最近打得吾系幾好既Szerbiak,點知他拿了30分6個板仲有2個BLKS... [/quote]
錯晒啦
一個球員岩岩復出,點都唔會打咁耐
AK 梗加係要打幾場先上力,點都係放佢o係 bench 好d啦
我個offer有冇可能呢?
艾力克 發表於 2005-11-26 11:30 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:29 AM:
哈哈, 都冇人換佢 ~ [/quote]
不過都係因為我個 blount 冇出, 佢先打得咁好咋 :D
你用 o'neal 換佢返黎,真係唔好咁易放,蝕死你呀
fantesticming05 發表於 2005-11-26 11:32 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:29 AM:
I dont want two Spurs ... S.Jackson 最近 stats 又的確好難令你接受。 我明白。我其實系想你拿了Jackson之後可以自己同清揚換Prince. 因為之前你話你想要Prince [/quote]
之前係.......但係now我冇呢個位置既需要 ~
再講, 清揚睇到佢既表現, 相信都唔一定肯換佢 ~
艾力克 發表於 2005-11-26 11:34 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:32 AM:
之前係.......但係now我冇呢個位置既需要 ~
再講, 清揚睇到佢既表現, 相信都唔一定肯換佢 ~ [/quote]
prince 都唔係打得好好姐 :o
fantesticming05 發表於 2005-11-26 11:34 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:34 AM:
prince 都唔係打得好好姐 :o [/quote]
總比佢好掛......
Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-26 11:35 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:32 AM:
之前係.......但係now我冇呢個位置既需要 ~
再講, 清揚睇到佢既表現, 相信都唔一定肯換佢 ~ [/quote]
我個Wells而家去Shutup果邊換Walker...你仲要吾要?
我同你trade開所以都問下你先
shut up can u give me a better players for S.Jackson + Wells ?
I want to release two players on my team ...
[[i] Last edited by Xtravagant on 2005-11-26 at 11:36 AM [/i]]
艾力克 發表於 2005-11-26 11:38 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:35 AM:
我個Wells而家去Shutup果邊換Walk... [/quote]
我放得佢走,都冇諗過要番佢:cool:
fantesticming05 發表於 2005-11-26 11:42 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:35 AM:
我個Wells而家去Shutup果邊換Walk... [/quote]
佢點會肯......
我仲諗緊, 今日會答你 ~
Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-26 11:42 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:38 AM:
我放得佢走,都冇諗過要番佢:cool: [/quote]
你個Walker好吸引,但我吾中意第6人 。
但呢個Trade吾系無得臨既...
艾力克 發表於 2005-11-26 11:46 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:42 AM:
你個Walker好吸引,但我吾中意第6人 。
但呢個Trade吾系無得臨既... [/quote]
我都係因為簽左 joe smith 打 PF 先放佢
你冇理由要速龍第6人 CV 都唔要 walker 掛
佢都有 15分 6籃板
要諗就cancel
你諗清楚先出offer啦 :cool:
Xtravagant 發表於 2005-11-26 11:49 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:42 AM:
佢點會肯......
我仲諗緊, 今日會答你 ~ [/quote]
我吾認為Jackson會系果D屬於FA無人要既player...只可惜我位置上用吾著距...
我之前都講過,你放Hurkglo用Jackson對你隊波系絕對有利。
因為Hurkoglu遲早會被打入冷宮。Jackson話曬都系正選實有30幾分鐘,點都好過Hurkoglu。雖然他最近打得差,但呢只不過系狀態問題。如果他下個禮拜打翻好絕對吾出奇。
fantesticming05 發表於 2005-11-26 11:52 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Xtravagant[/i] at 2005-11-26 11:49 AM:
我吾認為Jackson會系果D屬於FA無... [/quote]
你需要咩位置 ?