[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-11-13 07:01 PM:
不提倡睹博但有考眼光會否有點兒自打嘴巴呢? [/quote]
kobe講左只係增加版友們之間有多d互動,希望大家有分加又可以有討論空間討論場波
你認為係自打嘴巴既話根本上冇咩野可以再講落去........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-11-13 07:01 PM:
不提倡睹博但有考眼光會否有點兒自打嘴巴呢? [/quote]
其實佢講係有佢既道理，
佢開黎俾人玩但唔提倡賭，因為佢自己知自己唔係，
但如果人地一講賠率就被冠上「提倡賭博」。
[[i] Last edited by hiroraymond on 2005-11-13 at 07:06 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-11-13 19:01:
不提倡睹博但有考眼光會否有點兒自打嘴巴呢? [/quote]
都說了考眼光的本質是非常好的。原則在於讓大家睇下大家既眼光有幾準，可以話係只是一場牙較戰。當時並不涉及分數的輸贏。輸左既人，會以貼圖成式與板友分享。只是過久了不將被人這樣看代。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]hiroraymond[/i] at 2005-11-13 07:04 PM:
其實佢講係有佢既道理，
佢開黎俾人玩但唔提倡賭，因為佢自己知自己唔係，
但如果人地一講賭就被冠上「提倡賭博」。 [/quote]
我地並公開講過呢個遊戲唔係賭博遊戲......只屬普通遊戲+討論性質
咁點解我唔可以用賠率黎討論一場比賽呢？
[quote]Originally posted by [i]hiroraymond[/i] at 2005-11-13 07:07 PM:
咁點解我唔可以用賠率黎討論一場比賽呢？ [/quote]
咁咪啫係談及賭博.........如果你硬係要將自己認為合情合理既野放係呢度睇係冇可能.......
SEEK都話啦,家有家規,版有版規
[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-11-13 18:45:
你錯啦,你睇電視粗口係唔可以出街,講粗口係有幾會俾人告架~
但"賭博"係可以出街,而且仲唔洗成人陪同收看.....因為只屬吹水性質! [/quote]
你有可知否我地板裡面有幾多人係18歲以下的板友。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-11-13 07:09 PM:
咁咪啫係談及賭博.........如果你硬係要將自己認為合情合理既野放係呢度睇係冇可能.......
SEEK都話啦,家有家規,版有版規 [/quote]
下~~~你估人地0的賠率真係求其咁出架，
即使係一場強弱懸殊或者毫無名氣既比賽，
人地都會計過度過先出，
而由呢0的賠率係可以反映出專業人仕對球賽既預測。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]hiroraymond[/i] at 2005-11-13 07:12 PM:
下~~~你估人地0的賠率真係求其咁... [/quote]
鬼唔知咩.....如果你要當賠率呢家野係精密數學計出黎既話我冇野好講.......
[quote]Originally posted by [i]hiroraymond[/i] at 2005-11-13 19:12:
下~~~你估人地0的賠率真係求其咁... [/quote]
但有有人唔只講賠率喎。有人會講自己中左場波膽、又有人話自己贏左場波收左幾多幾多倍。不過好少人會話自己輸左囉。俾D細路聽到咪會覺得中波等於贏多於輸。。。
就以琴晚阿根廷對英格蘭為例，
馬會賠率阿根廷2.25，英格蘭2.75，
大2.1，細1.65，
咁即係人地睇好阿根廷贏兼全場入唔多過兩球，
但究竟點解呢？
點解英格蘭會被睇低一線，
點解會認為三球以上既機會係細0的呢？
難道佢地覺得雙方都唔會點攻？仰或懷疑基斯普，奧雲，林伯特，朗尼，謝拉特等既入球能力呢？
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-11-13 07:15 PM:
但有有人唔只講賠率喎。有人會講自... [/quote]
但頭先又有人話因賭而死既唔知幾多%，
報紙亦話欠下一身賭債，
咁即係話俾人知賭係輸多。
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]hiroraymond[/i] at 2005-11-13 19:17:
但頭先又有人話因賭而死既唔知幾多%，
報紙亦話欠下一身賭債，
咁即係話俾人知賭係輸多。 [/quote]
但係呢度無人講丫麻。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-11-13 07:15 PM:
但有有人唔只講賠率喎。有人會講自... [/quote]
係呀.......
同埋有個問題，點解會有飛機區呢？
[quote]Originally posted by [i]hiroraymond[/i] at 2005-11-13 07:16 PM:
就以琴晚阿根廷對英格蘭為例，
馬會... [/quote]
唔好將自己既事情合法化,係社會合法唔代表呢度係
[quote]Originally posted by [i]hiroraymond[/i] at 2005-11-13 07:17 PM:
但頭先又有人話因賭而死既唔知幾多%，
報紙亦話欠下一身賭債，
咁即係話俾人知賭係輸多。 [/quote]
咁咪就係話呢度d人帶出錯誤信息囉
[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-11-13 19:17:
其實我已從正確既途徑申請過整個... [/quote]
專區其實係有。我地係可以接受。。就好似亨九利之前果個咁。。seek應該有入過。。
如果你真係咁希望有，可以搵返上黎。依家唔知浸左去邊。
咁如果我用頭先既方法去分析一場比賽，
係咪一樣會被人警告呢？