火箭同湖人一樣。。。簽左兩個唔掂既大前鋒=.="
Swift vs K.brown
兩個都係值成幾百萬，不過就交得果單位數得分、單位數籃板。0.幾個封波。。。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-11-28 12:06 AM:
一年就玩完？？=.=唔通怕左多幾個芬... [/quote]
我都唔多清楚,之前好似話剩係今年用.......
10分, 8reb, 1 block.....7、800萬年薪......
雖然暫時黎講個要求係高左dd,
但係特登搵佢番黎,12分,9reb,2block都唔多過分啫,
佢自己都應該知恥近乎勇吧,以自己的身體質素,又有kobe同odom的軒制作用,
靠勤力博都博到番黎啦......唔通佢想一世俾人叫做水貨狀元咩.............
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2005-11-28 00:16:
我都唔多清楚,之前好似話剩係今年用... [/quote]
這是所有湖人迷呢一刻希望期待到既野。
雖然佢係廢
不過我唔覺得lakers會咁快trade走佢或者放棄佢...
因為其實陣中都冇一個好既大前
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lintohu[/i] at 2005-11-28 05:43:
雖然佢係廢
不過我唔覺得lakers會咁快trade走佢或者放棄佢...
因為其實陣中都冇一個好既大前 [/quote]
而且根本上都無球隊會想要佢，想trade都無得trade。。。。
依家只可要希望佢有好D既表現、啦。
湖人今日又輸了,
kobe 46分力挽狂攔都無用.................
odom 11射中1....都係番鄉下耕田吧la........
Odom+K.brown+$ 換Garnett唔知得唔得呢？？
不過木狼多數唔肯。。。
如果係之前Odom+Bulter+Akinns可能得。:o
唔好只講Odom丫，連S.parker都回晒塘。。。。。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-11-28 05:18 PM:
Odom+K.brown+$ 換Garnett唔知得唔得呢？？
不過木狼多數唔肯。。。
如果係之前Odom+Bulter+Akinns可能得。:o [/quote]
如果木狼肯的話sure換啦,
但係木狼肯咩?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-11-28 05:19 PM:
唔好只講Odom丫，連S.parker都回晒塘。。。。。 [/quote]
parker話晒都新, 唔穩係預算之中
但係odom... 見佢同kobe都冇乜火花, 可能真係要trade走佢...
Hawks: Joe Johnson + Marvin Williams + Al Harrington (exp) + Tony Delk (exp). Gives the Wolves flexibility and a couple young players.
---
Bulls: Tyson Chandler + Tim Thomas (exp) + either Deng or Gordon. The Chicago players have a lot of trade restrictions, so I don't even know if this is possible, but it would again leave the Wolves with flexibility and good young players.
---
Mavs: Van Horn (huge exp) + Daniels + Harris + Christie. This one works salary-wise, but it would be better to find a combo of players that isn't all guards. Maybe substitute Josh Howard for Daniels.
---
Grizz: Jones (huge exp) + Wright (exp) + Warrick + Battier. Not a huge amount of talent coming back, but it does leave them with a lot of room.
---
Knicks: Hardaway (huge exp) + Davis (huge exp) + Frye + Ariza. This clears away virtually all of the Wolves salary obligations, and gives them two guys who will at least be starting-quality players.
---
Sixers: Mashburn (exp) + Dalembert + Korver + Iguadala. Somebody who knows a lot about CBA would have to fine tune this one, because it doesn't work as is, but the basis of the trade is to strip Philly of all their young players in exchange for "win now while Iverson still can."
---
Raptors: Rose, Peterson, Williams (large 1 year deals left) + Villanueva and Graham. Looks like a bad trade for the Raptors, but I think it's good for the Wolves, as is the point of this thread.
Odom+K.brown+S.parker/$ 同上述球隊既條件唔差得好遠，不過木狼肯唔肯就另一回事。。
[[i] Last edited by shaqkobe on 2005-11-28 at 05:51 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2005-11-28 05:11 PM:
湖人今日又輸了,
kobe 46分力挽狂攔都無用.................
odom 11射中1....都係番鄉下耕田吧la........ [/quote]
kobe 46分,咁咪啫係好獨食
好唔鍾意佢咁樣
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-11-28 17:50:
kobe 46分,咁咪啫係好獨食
好唔鍾意佢咁樣 [/quote]
你無睇到近排既比賽係唔明架啦。。
佢依家係無人幫到佢，先至迫住自己攻。。
你睇Odom 11射1中，S.Parker8射2中………第二、三得分球員打成咁，唔自己攻多D連贏既機會都完全無。。。。
ps.請nash兄不要動氣
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-11-28 05:50 PM:
kobe 46分,咁咪啫係好獨食
好唔鍾意佢咁樣 [/quote]
你再睇下其他人d得分
再睇nba.com話最多輸成18分, 段highlight見kobe係咁發力追....
如果唔係佢, ot都唔洗打, 仲有一節垃圾時間...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-11-28 05:55 PM:
你無睇到近排既比賽係唔明架啦。。
佢依家係無人幫到佢，先至迫住自己攻。。
你睇Odom 11射1中，S.Parker8射2中………第二、三得分球員打成咁，唔自己攻多D連贏既機會都完全無。。。。
ps.請nash兄不要動氣
... [/quote]
我正想回post的時候就見到你句-------ps.請nash兄不要動氣:P:P:P
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2005-11-28 18:03:
我正想回post的時候就見到你句-------ps.請nash兄不要動氣:P:P:P [/quote]
因為知道又觸動到你既逆鱗丫麻。哈:D
不過見湖人今日咁樣輸,真係幾興,
回 ge post語氣都重左d........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-11-28 06:05 PM:
因為知道又觸動到你既逆鱗丫麻。哈:D [/quote]
說實在,唔多鐘意人地無睇過比賽,only睇數據就批評呢個嗰個(kobe就更加啦:P)
kobe俾人話左幾年啦......打波話獨食,講官司又俾人話強姦犯......
好多nba球員都有做錯野啦,(甚至左敦,iverson, kidd),但俾人鬧ge總係kobe....改過咪得law,
經過上季的教訓,今季睇得出佢係成熟左,亂出手少左, 防守交到功課,
比賽剩番2分幾鐘,領先十幾分,救出界波都係好博.....
但只要比賽一輸波d人就話kobe獨獨獨......好無奈.....
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2005-11-28 18:14:
說實在,唔多鐘意人地無睇過比賽,onl... [/quote]
完全明白你既感受。。
唔唔唔... 今日 JK 好勁，差 D 大四喜，35 pts，12 ast，8 reb，7 to (哈哈)~~~
不過佢今日 FG 可以 11/21 (52.38%)，FT 12/15 (80%)，算係咁啦~
KB 雖然話 46 分，但係 FG 14/36 (38.89%)，如果唔計其中 3 分球 4/12 (33.33%)，即係得 10/24 (41.67%)，實在有點「浪」。無奈其他人仲唔爭氣，除左 B. Cook 有 5/11 (45.45%) 之外，全部食左屎咁，整體得 32/95 (33.68%)！
回想以前 MJ，雖然一樣係獨食 (所以我唔多喜歡)，但至少以生涯 30.1 PPG，49.7 FG%，實在唔簡單，尤其係 SG。你睇番而家所謂新星、巨星：
AI ── 27.6 PPG，41.8 FG%
LBJ ── 24.4 PPG，45 FG%
V. Carter ── 23.8 PPG，44.8 FG%
P. Pierce ── 23 PPG，43.6 FG%
KB ── 22.6 PPG，45.1 FG%
T-Mac ── 22 PPG，44.3 FG%
除左 Shaq 26.7 PPG，57.9% (仲要係 Center) 之外，根本冇人有以前 MJ 既水準。任你 D 傳媒、廣告商、marketing 點吹都好，根本自從 Drean Team I 之後 D 水準就一直退步，甚至可以話有今生，冇來世 (黃興桂金句)，淨係睇 Charles Barkley 6 呎 4 打 PF，22.1 PPG，11.7 RPG，54.1 FG%，簡直係奇蹟！ (記得佢後期轉去火箭，第一場對住舊隊太陽，就攞左 33 個籃板球！問你死味，6 呎 4 咋！)
而家 NBA，除左舊年 T-Mac 三十幾秒攞 13 分之外，都冇乜野驚喜‧‧‧