[quote]Originally posted by [i]28083003[/i] at 2005-12-1 10:28 AM:
施仙奴好過沙加度!?!?wtf!!!!
巴西球... [/quote]
所以話我唔知施仙奴好唔好,因為我根本未睇過佢,不過皇馬買得佢唔係替卡路士就係替沙加度嫁啦
[quote]Originally posted by [i]28083003[/i] at 2005-12-1 10:23 AM:
i hvn't said that ''加西亞買返黎就... [/quote]
我唔係好明你最尾果句~
盧森保高用柏保路加西亞係想佢專做防守,你睇下攞波多數即刻比波其他球員就知道盧森保高應該冇叫佢參與攻勢,而我認為防中選擇有柏保路加西亞同拉莫斯,不過拉莫斯係唔係真係可以勝任呢個位都會睇下有冇機會再比佢試
另外,盧森保高應該唔會加維臣咁多,始終佢好似唔係咁鍾意佢
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-12-1 10:31 AM:
所以話我唔知施仙奴好唔好,因為我根本未睇過佢,不過皇馬買得佢唔係替卡路士就係替沙加度嫁啦 [/quote]
我睇過c仙奴d片,成日有波入架
係禁區頂射d波好勁,下下都死角
不過可能巴西聯冇咁高質素先成日入波
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-12-1 10:42 AM:
我睇過c仙奴d片,成日有波入架
係禁區頂射d波好勁,下下都死角
不過可能巴西聯冇咁高質素先成日入波 [/quote]
始終佢係打閘,無論攻守佢都要得先叫做好,沙加度攔截波係唔錯既,但係佢企得太前,令到右邊空位太多........:o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-12-1 10:44 AM:
始終佢係打閘,無論攻守佢都要得先叫做好,沙加度攔截波係唔錯既,但係佢企得太前,令到右邊空位太多........:o [/quote]
同埋c仙奴既仲係年青,有排打
何況係巴西既右後衛,經驗會慢慢累積
始終有優勢,但短期來冇乜可能取代沙加度既正選
要慢慢識認西甲既節奏先
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-12-1 10:51 AM:
同埋c仙奴既仲係年青,有排打
何況係巴西既右後衛,經驗會慢慢累積
始終有優勢,但短期來冇乜可能取代沙加度既正選
要慢慢識認西甲既節奏先 [/quote]
我都唔希望佢一黎就係正選,不過佢黎到起碼比到威脅沙加度,等佢可以踢好d:D
............i mentioned that garcia is 防中, so the front-part of the team hv only 5 players should participate in attacting,no matter use gravesen or garcia or even ramos,they also not participate in attacting. but i think use gravesen will hv a better 效果,since his攔截is more directly,he got so much cards since 西甲unlike英超,he just performs wt he did in everton. i think using him in the matches with teams like barca,chelsea,arsenal is better than use garcia,actually garcia also got many cards la. as the CF not giving enough pressure to others defender, tackle at mid-field is much much important, so i prefer 2 防中,gravesen and garcia, 1 tall 1 short can 補位.i think this is the best choice for real.
the last sentence.....i just highlight that i know that i know wt is防中!!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]28083003[/i] at 2005-12-1 11:01 AM:
............i mentioned that garcia... [/quote]
唔好意思,唔識睇英文:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-12-1 10:52 AM:
我都唔希望佢一黎就係正選,不過佢黎到起碼比到威脅沙加度,等佢可以踢好d:D [/quote]
咁又係,又壓力先有進步
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-12-1 11:04 AM:
咁又係,又壓力先有進步 [/quote]
佢係勤力既,但係太多時間係前場喇,應該多d返後場:D
robinho finishing is gd or not 我唔太清楚,coz although he is CF but his actual postion is翼鋒
til now still hv not chance for him to do sum 單刀,so cant said that he shooting is suck
wt i can c is that he 落到底,cant find a teammate that he can pass the ball,all企o係度,
u want him crossthe ball to the center and shot it for goal???
a little bit unfair on him
baptista,ronaldo,their use are similar,although 一個肯跑一個唔跑,
i think use them for CF is重疊
i will try baptista+robinho other than baptista+ronaldo
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-12-1 11:02 AM:
唔好意思,唔識睇英文:) [/quote]
咁算啦,我在英國已經3點幾啦
瞓啦,無時間打過...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]28083003[/i] at 2005-12-1 11:13 AM:
咁算啦,我在英國已經3點幾啦
瞓啦,無時間打過... [/quote]
goodnight
[quote]Originally posted by [i]28083003[/i] at 2005-12-1 11:13 AM:
咁算啦,我在英國已經3點幾啦
瞓啦,無時間打過... [/quote]
唔緊要,唔介意既話下次可以打中文:D
拜拜:D
同埋我想問點解前面D回應得幾行都有分加
我打老蓮咁長反而無呢............
:([url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=91511&fpage=1[/url]
[url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=92120&fpage=1[/url]
li兩個同埋之前drogba個post都係咁...........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]28083003[/i] at 2005-12-1 12:03 PM:
同埋我想問點解前面D回應得幾行都有分... [/quote]
有2個可能
1)唔係長就一定有分加架,要有建設性,回覆有point,見解獨到且說服力強
2)版主睇唔到
Man utd should buy ballack.but....:(
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2005-12-1 12:08 PM:
有2個可能
1)唔係長就一定有分加架,要有建設性,回覆有point,見解獨到且說服力強
2)版主睇唔到 [/quote]
啱呀,最緊要有point,冇point既話打幾長都係假,上面我同28083003兄都有加分~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2005-12-1 12:12 AM:
球員名 (中) 杜舒亞
球員名 (英... [/quote]
唔該哂, winning買佢先
[quote]Originally posted by [i]單字一個撚[/i] at 2005-12-1 12:15 AM:
曼聯搶番洛賓番黎啦..橫掂佢而家係車... [/quote]
車仔唔要都唔會放俾曼聯啦﹐咁做即係送把刀俾自己o既敵人去殺自己
費sir講到明唔會斟波歷克