[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2005-12-31 00:41:
呢d 全部都係控衛喎...雖然o'neal 加盟 haet, duncan 加盟 spurs 有同樣效果
以往 t-mac 打魔術同速龍都做過控衛, 如果佢重操故業會唔會有改變呢? [/quote]
我寧願佢做返依家既小前鋒/得分後衛。無可能埋沒佢晒搶分能力，因為火箭可以搶分既人已經唔多。。:o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]shaqkobe[/i] at 2005-12-26 03:11 AM:
拉舒可以叫做係有個人得分能力唔係... [/quote]
我唔係咁應同呀..Rasheed 之前的打法好勁爆的，禁區到3分線都有得分能力，
防守強，次次對Duncun，duncun d得分一係好低，
仲記得佢timeout o個時"星"左沙邦尼斯一巴，真係好爆下，
轉左去detriot之後，佢將得分責任都放比其他人，少d得分，大局為重，
同上年Detriot同indiana打大交佢冇出手..就知佢收哂火。
所以感覺上佢差左，但係Rasheed的得分能力一定唔弱...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nikinikiniki[/i] at 2006-1-2 03:09 AM:
我唔係咁應同呀..Rasheed 之前... [/quote]
執到啦佢, 本來冇 rasheed, detroit 都係一隊勁旅, 都夠贏總冠軍, 佢入到去就執到隻冠軍指環, 如果佢仲留o係 blazer, 今年都唔知點
hoston太過依賴T-mac.
Yau又一直打唔起，籃板..真係唔好提...
佢真係太柔弱了，同太過中國人，太謙讓喇，成日比人in your face,
所以d人就唔怕你。冇O'Neal或Big Ben o個種"禁區我話事"o個隻feel...
我覺得trade走Yau 換多幾個禁區苦力好過
[[i] Last edited by nikinikiniki on 2006-1-2 at 03:31 AM [/i]]
it seems to me that neither tmac nor yao ming is more important...they just can't be compared in terms of importance...they r equally important just like what skjeiw said: a left leg is as important as a right leg. some of u may say tmac is definitely more important...but i dun think so! he just doesn't have leadership...just think about Orlando Magic couple yrs ago...he was unable to lead the team ...not too sure but i remember Orlando ended up getting the worst record.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2006-1-2 03:12 AM:
執到啦佢, 本來冇 rasheed, detroit 都係一隊勁旅, 都夠贏總冠軍, 佢入到去就執到隻冠軍指環, 如果佢仲留o係 blazer, 今年都唔知點 [/quote]
無sheed 的話活塞唔夠拎冠軍ga,
記得佢未黎之前,活塞只係一支東岸勁隊, 但係到東岸決賽都係俾藍網掃走左.....
嗰陣活塞無乜人打內線.....內線防守都係得老ben....
係到第二季季中,活塞係鷹隊換佢番黎, 完成埋最後一塊平圖, 先有奪標能力~
sheed黎左活塞之後,無以前咁火爆, 佢內線的進攻與防守經驗幫左活塞好多~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-2 12:17:
無sheed 的話活塞唔夠拎冠軍ga,
記... [/quote]
完全同意。:D
shaqkobe, in ur previous post (forgot which one), u said that we can't really compare Kobe or tmac with kidd due to different position and i dun think this statement is too right...i mean, if we can't compare players with different position, how else was jordan known to be the best!? The best simply means better than others "in different positions". itz hard to compare, but itz certainly possilbe to compare...something that can always be distinguished from a all-star player and a not so all-star player would be his ability to knock down shots in crunch time, ability to lead a team, etc..and i think these criteria might be how all-star players in different positions are evaluated...RIGHT??
[quote]Originally posted by [i]filter-074baller66[/i] at 2006-1-2 03:39 PM:
shaqkobe, in ur previous post (forg... [/quote]
so kidd 係 all-star player, t-mac & kobe 呢??
我覺得以星味計, t-mac 同 kobe 都穩据前列, 起碼佢地對專用鞋長出長有丫
jason kidd 係頂級球員, 尤其打反擊o既球隊最需要佢, so 我諗係戰術問題令人覺得佢係最佳控衛啦, 但係打陣地戰o個陣佢個效用就用 t-mac 同 kobe 咁明顯, 起碼佢唔可以憑爆發力切入禁區博犯規 or 走籃丫, 相反我覺得 t-mac 同 kobe 打反擊係有能力傳到一d jason kidd 傳到o既波, 不過佢地心態上唔願意咁做o者, so 以能力計, kidd 同另外兩位真係差少少
where did i say jason kidd is better!? the only message i was trying to convey is that we can compare players in different positions...thatz all! and if i am asked to choose the best player out of those three...kobe would definitely be the one! jason kidd just doesn't seem to be as gd as he ONCE was after the injury..
[quote]Originally posted by [i]filter-074baller66[/i] at 2006-1-3 09:13 AM:
where did i say jason kidd is bette... [/quote]
係lo,傷完之後感覺上好似退步左.....
成個nba 除左kidd同nash之外, 都無乜邊個pg 可以串起到成波同令整隊球員有明顯進步....
這些pg 也是稀有動物呢~:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-3 16:45:
係lo,傷完之後感覺上好似退步左.....
成個nba 除左kidd同nash之外, 都無乜邊個pg 可以串起到成波同令整隊球員有明顯進步....
這些pg 也是稀有動物呢~:) [/quote]
加上Kidd年紀都已經開始大啦。就黎33歲對於一個PG黎講已經算係高齡，大幅度既活動、快速既上落、全場既走動都為佢做成左唔少壓力。所以我覺得佢會進一步減低自己既得分，在籃板同助攻上繼續發揮所能。不過佢既經驗、視野、球中既地位，仍使Kidd成為NBA數一數二既一級控衛。。。
maybe chris paul or deron williams will be the best future point guard..haha
哈哈，竟然我唔係度都有人講 Kidd...
將項目分開來評審 Kidd 是不對的！看他得分根本就屎！傳球是有點功架，如針孔式彈地傳球，但根本很小出現，一場一兩下到。當然，rebound 是他勤力既成果。
佢最值錢既地方就係能控制節奏，打出士氣 (不論團隊或個別隊友)，引發 (善用) 隊友的 potential (你看 K. Mart 或 Van Horn 而家)，及人際關係 (好多人之前都好擔心 V. Carter + R. Jefferson + Kidd 會嘈交，但結果不知幾夾)‧‧‧ 呢 D 都係唔可以睇 stat 及 T-Mac，KB，Marbury 等做唔到既野。
雖然 Kidd 年仕漸高，但他賣的不是運動能力，相信佢仍可以係 top PG 多幾年。