踢走麥卡倫能否挽救英格蘭???

ming8964

英格蘭的問題早在艾歷臣時己存在, 國家隊領隊表面風光, 實際上受到極大製肘, 不似執掌球會話曬事!!! 無論誰任領隊, 就算大牌球星(如謝拉特,林伯特,朗尼)如何不濟和格格不入,  也不敢棄用!!!
球會賽事過密, 球員重視球會多於國家, 重用外援輕視青訓, 球會強國家弱的格局己形成!!!
英西德意法荷等名牌國家隊近年表現經常令人失望, 否則希臘又怎能爆冷捧走歐洲國家杯!!!

keung623

我覺得最有問題係林伯特咯~如果唔係佢可能好好多~

GeXcube680

視乎接任人選

fvgtrb

視乎接任人選，最好同英超所有球會關係都好好，可以除時要人，咁就very good。

rfky

Originally posted by keung623 at 2007-3-28 17:22:
我覺得最有問題係林伯特咯~如果唔係佢可能好好多~

林伯特都唔係好差啫
最多話佢同謝拉特重疊

76

當佢係world cup 一拎波就射...射親都抄....左面joe cole 空晒都唔比波佢....我就覺得佢好廢

Raul

I vote for 視乎接任人選 as well

donald15

Originally posted by rfky at 2007-3-28 07:29 PM:


林伯特都唔係好差啫
最多話佢同謝拉特重疊

林伯其實佢唔岩依家英格蘭個陣叫佢踢451打前鋒後面o個個就話岩佢姐
依家要佢係中場跟本做唔到野
佢做傳波/供應其實極之一般
睇下佢入波數字就知啦佢專責其實就係遠射
遠射方面英格蘭大把人都射得
謝拉特一樣好射得往往係關鍵時刻射個世界波扭轉形勢
而且佢傳送防守走動點都係林伯之上
如果計中場中呢個位點計都係謝拉特優勝
但係往往教練只會睇球員係咪夠大粒
林伯夠晒大粒車路士第二靈魂點敢唔選佢但係佢踢個位置得一個就係中場中
咁唯有將同樣大粒既萬能中場謝拉特放邊d成者後d
試諗諗如果唔用林伯用謝拉特取代再加一個正宗防中柏加,夏格維斯呢類
再加埋左右中場分工即刻清晰晒
依家林伯謝拉特一齊出就有塞車同埋兩頭唔到岸既感覺
真係唔明點解可以咁決絕唔要碧咸但係又唔敢唔用林伯
之前又話碧咸慢突破能力唔夠好唔用佢
好啦到依家冇用碧咸啦但係我又唔見得兩邊好得幾多喎
作為支持左英格蘭十年既小球迷都開始對麥卡倫領軍既英格蘭心淡
依家連扭開電視睇英格蘭既動力都唔見晒
麥卡倫唉....早走早著啦

Wong Suiping

恐怕踢得太遲

terencey

1. McClaren should think about how to solve the problem of Gerrard and Lampard. These are the good players but they need a clearer role and instructions. Otherwise, England should only use one of them and play with Owen Hargreaves in central midfield.

2. He should have a clear picture that what formation or style of football he wants England like.

3. I think he should filter-004 more with his assistant, Terry Venables, as he seems his tactical thinking or knowledge is not strong enough at the highest level matches. Venables can help him a lot.

4. Please don't use Lennon to play at left hand side. It's a waste of his talent.

5. Please step down asap, Mr. McClaren. You seems a good coach, but not a good manager.