Mcdyess對活記重要or Horry對馬記重要?

goodgirl1

Mcdyess對活記重要or Horry對馬記重要?
i think Mcdyess因為除左佢就冇具份量後備
but
horry,關鍵時候3分靠晒佢
so
2個分別係2邊既球員
緊係2個都咁重要啦= =~
真係要揀既話 horry
因為佢總決賽經驗豐富,關鍵時刻心理質素高
當然攻守都有一定能力,但呢2點係最緊要

Gretzky

Based on the 3 games played.

McDyess is less of a bench factor...I still think reading of the game and defense is his asset...not his scoring ability. Pistons need him to contribute better from the bench....since he could be the factor in the next two games.

Horry...needless to say he's the go to guy in 3 pt shots...but I wonder if this is needed in this series....Parker and Gino has been incredible....

Conclusion: If Horry goes to sleep...Spurs is okay...if MdDyess daydreams...the Pistons are dead.

F.king

Horry
Even though I am not spurs fans, I still think that Horry is one of the best players in NBA

if you see the statistics, he is not the toppest players.
However, if you watch his games, his importance is as same as the best players in every team.

he can do everything in defense and he is also a very good offensive player
In addition, he is not a self-fish player and he could choose the best decision in the important memont
therefore, when he is in the game, his teammates can be much easier to score because Horry knows how to run to a place to break the zone (run out to three points line, screen, run inside for waiting offensive rebound or score...)
because his FG% is really good, he can always break the zone for his teammates without his directly assist and his teammates can score much easier that not have to pass to him; therefore, his statistic is not as good as "superstar" (Of course, his pass assist is very good too; but usually he is not the one assist directly to the player who score)

he defense is really good and I don't know how to explain( I am not good in basketball)
but you can see he can assist teammates to double team in the right time but not miss the player who he has to follow (and his defense is not too violence)

therefore, I think Horry is more important
because I think even though Mcdyess is very good, but he is not as good as Horry in some jobs which is not in statistics

p.s. maybe I don't really understand Mcdyess, because I didn't watch his games a lot
I feel sorry if my points are not correct

goodgirl1

Gretzky i agree with what u just said
- basically.. spurs' bench is stronger than pistons' because like you said even if horry is off fire.. they still hv guys to creat matchup problems..
- on the other hand, Mcdyess seems the only bench contributor for pistons so far in the series..

秋葉林

雖然我個人鍾意 Horry 多啲，但係如果係問 Mcdyess 對活塞重要啲定係 Horry 對馬刺重要啲，咁就當然係 Mcdyess 對活塞重要啲啦。

主要係因為活塞隊除咗 Mcdyess 之外，根本無乜內線嘅替補球員，相反馬刺果邊 Horry 嘅角色有其他人可以替代﹙當然係除咗佢嘅經驗同救命三分波之外啦﹚，所以馬刺無咗 Horry 未必贏唔到總冠軍，但係活塞無咗 Mcdyess，兩個 Wallace 會辛苦好多，一個唔生性有犯規纏身，內線就會出現崩潰。

cho1989

兩個啲經驗都對球隊好重要

benben

我好同意 "秋葉林" ga 話法, Mcdyess比較重要d.

清揚

麥帶斯更堅,比佢打正選代拉舒特.華來士仲好la,大家點睇???

brightlee

no...... I am opposite than you....
R. Wallace needs to be in starting lineup..
cos he can play low posts, he can shoot in mid-range, he can block
but for McDyess, he's an interior scorer
that's why R. Wallace should be in the starting lineup,

清揚

拉舒特.華來士識守唔多識攻,射波又下下炒,點搞ar